Эта страница есть и на русском сайте: открыть по-русски.

John RuskinДжон Рёскин

78 passagesотрывков: 78

Each date opens its day beside the list, with these passages marked.Каждая дата открывает свой день рядом со списком, где отрывки этого автора отмечены.

  1. 7. Предназначенный нам труд мы должны выполнять честно и безукоризненно, всё равно, надеемся ли мы со временем стать ангелами, или верим в то, что когда-то были слизняками.

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. The work appointed for us we must do honestly and faultlessly, whether we hope in time to become angels or believe that we were once slugs.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LXXVI 'Our Battle is Immortal' · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    … that human work must be done honourably and thoroughly, because we are now Men ; — whether we ever expect to be angels, or ever were slugs, being practically no matter.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LXXVI 'Our Battle is Immortal' (Venice, Sunday 4 March 1877); vol. IV of the George Allen edition, 1906, Letter LXXVI, early in the letter, where Ruskin tells how in 1858 he 'discovered a fallacy which had underlain all my art teaching'.

    Close. Ruskin's 'human work' becomes 'the work appointed to us'; 'honourably and thoroughly' becomes 'honestly and faultlessly'; the reason Ruskin gives ('because we are now Men') is left out, and 'being practically no matter' becomes 'it is all the same whether'. Ruskin's words are printed here without the omitted clause. Probably through Nikiforov's Russian selection, vol. III (Posrednik, 1904), which the Jubilee list of sources names.

  2. 3. Нужно остерегаться двух одинаково пагубных суеверий: суеверия богословов, учащих тому, что сущность божества может быть выражена словами, и суеверия науки, полагающей, что божественная сила может быть объяснена научными исследованиями.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. We must beware of two equally pernicious superstitions: the superstition of the theologians, who teach that the essence of the Deity can be expressed in words, and the superstition of science, which supposes that the divine power can be explained by scientific research.

    John Ruskin.

    From Lectures on Art, delivered before the University of Oxford in Hilary Term 1870, Lecture … · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The two opposite Prides” become “two equally pernicious superstitions,” though Ruskin calls the Pride of Faith “the most deadly.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    And in these days you have to guard against the fatallest darkness of the two opposite Prides;--the Pride of Faith, which imagines that the nature of the Deity can be defined by its convictions; and the Pride of Science, which imagines that the energy of Deity can be explained by its analysis.
    Of these, the first, the Pride of Faith, is now, as it has been always, the most deadly, …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Lectures on Art, delivered before the University of Oxford in Hilary Term 1870, Lecture II 'The Relation of Art to Religion', Lecture II, end of §38 (with the opening of §39).

    The same two errors under other names. Ruskin's 'the two opposite Prides' becomes 'two equally pernicious superstitions'; 'the Pride of Faith, which imagines that the nature of the Deity can be defined by its convictions' becomes 'the superstition of the theologians, who teach that the essence of the deity can be expressed in words'; 'the Pride of Science, which imagines that the energy of Deity can be explained by its analysis' becomes 'the superstition of science, which supposes that divine power can be explained by scientific investigation'. 'Equally' departs from Ruskin, who goes on at once to call the Pride of Faith the more deadly of the two. Probably through Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1904).

  3. 3. Знание подобно ходячей монете. Человек имеет отчасти право гордиться обладанием ею, если он сам поработал над ее золотом и пробовал ее чеканить, или по крайней мере честно приобрел ее уже испробованною. Но когда он ничего этого не делал, а получил от какого-то прохожего, который бросил ее ему в лицо, то какое же основание имеет он гордиться ею?

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. Knowledge is like current coin. A man has some right to be proud of possessing it if he himself has worked its gold and tried to mint it, or at least has come by it honestly, already tested. But when he has done none of this, but got it from some passer-by who threw it in his face, what grounds has he to be proud of it?

    John Ruskin.

    From The Stones of Venice, vol. III · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Knowledge is like current coin. A man may have some right to be proud of possessing it, if he has worked for the gold of it, and assayed it, and stamped it, so that it may be received of all men as true; or earned it fairly, being already assayed: but if he has done none of these things, but only had it thrown in his face by a passer-by, what cause has he to be proud?
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · «Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день»
    Знание подобно ходячей монете. Человек имеет отчасти право гордиться обладанием ею, если он сам поработал над ее золотом и пробовал ее чеканить, или по крайней мере честно приобрел ее уже испробованною.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Stones of Venice, vol. III (1853), chapter II 'Roman Renaissance', Ch. II, §XXXIV, in the passage on the pride of science ('There is, indeed, nothing of which man has any right to be proud').

    Close, word for word in the Circle as in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 3 November). Left out: 'so that it may be received of all men as true'. 'assayed it, and stamped it' becomes 'tried to stamp it' (пробовал ее чеканить, likely a misreading of 'assayed'). Ruskin's words are printed here without the omitted clause.

  4. 5. Цель истинного воспитания — не только в том, чтобы заставлять людей делать добрые дела, но и находить в них радость; не только быть чистыми, но и любить чистоту; не только быть справедливыми, но и алкать и жаждать справедливости.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. The aim of true education lies in making people not only do good deeds, but also find joy in them; not only be pure, but love purity; not only be just, but hunger and thirst after justice.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Crown of Wild Olive · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    And the entire object of true education is to make people not merely _do_ the right things, but _enjoy_ the right things--not merely industrious, but to love industry--not merely learned, but to love knowledge--not merely pure, but to love purity--not merely just, but to hunger and thirst after justice.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Crown of Wild Olive (1866), Lecture II 'Traffic' (Town Hall, Bradford, 21 April 1864), Lecture II, in the argument that taste is a moral quality, after 'The man is not in health of body who is always thirsting for the bottle in the cupboard'.

    Close. Of Ruskin's five pairs Tolstoy keeps three; 'not merely industrious, but to love industry' and 'not merely learned, but to love knowledge' are left out. 'do the right things, but enjoy the right things' becomes 'do good deeds, but find joy in them'. Ruskin's words are printed here without the two omitted pairs (his italics on do and enjoy dropped).

    Translation note. “Hunger and thirst” is the phrase of Matthew 5:6 (KJV: “hunger and thirst after righteousness”); Tolstoy’s word here is «справедливость», “justice”.

  5. 3. Где начинается искание истины, там всегда начинается жизнь; как только прекращается искание истины, прекращается и жизнь.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. Wheresoever the search after truth begins, there life begins; wheresoever that search ceases, there life ceases.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Two Paths · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    Where the search for truth begins, there life always begins; as soon as the search for truth ceases, life ceases too.
    John Ruskin’s own words
    But do not suppose that the law which I am stating to you--the great law of art-life--can only be seen in these, …
    Wheresoever the search after truth begins, there life begins; wheresoever that search ceases, there life ceases.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · «Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день»
    Где начинается искание истины, там всегда начинается жизнь; как только прекращается искание истины, прекращается и жизнь.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Two Paths (1859), Lecture I 'The Deteriorative Power of Conventional Art over Nations' (Kensington Museum, January 1858), Lecture I, after the comparison of the Florentine, Venetian, and Lombard schools: 'the great law of art-life'.

    A close translation, as in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 22 October); Tolstoy adds 'always' and repeats 'the search for truth'. Ruskin states it as 'the great law of art-life', of schools of painting; Tolstoy gives it as a law of life.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  6. 5. Мы любим предметы за их несовершенство, которое божественно предопределено для того, чтобы законом человеческой жизни было усилие, а законом человеческого суда милосердие.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. We love things for their imperfection, which is divinely ordained so that the law of human life may be effort, and the law of human judgment mercy.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Stones of Venice, vol. II · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    All things are literally better, lovelier, and more beloved for the imperfections which have been divinely appointed, that the law of human life may be Effort, and the law of human judgment, Mercy.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · «Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день»
    Мы потому любим предметы за их несовершенство, которое божественно предопределено, чтобы законом человеческой жизни было усилие, а законом человеческого суда милосердие.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Stones of Venice, vol. II (1853), chapter VI 'The Nature of Gothic', Ch. VI, §XXV ('The second reason is, that imperfection is in some sort essential to all that we know of life').

    Close. 'All things are literally better, lovelier, and more beloved for the imperfections' becomes 'We love things for their imperfection'. In Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 15 May) the sentence began 'We therefore love' and was followed by a second ('Only God has completeness, and the more perfect the human mind becomes, the better it feels the boundless difference between the work of God and of man'), which is not in Ruskin's §XXV and is dropped in the Circle. Ruskin's sentence is printed here without 'better, lovelier, and'.

  7. 6. Как первое правило мудрости состоит в познании самого себя, — хотя это всего труднее, — так и первое правило милосердия состоит в том, чтобы довольствоваться малым, хотя и это так же трудно; и только такой довольный и умиротворенный человек и явится сильным для оказания милосердия другим.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. As the first rule of wisdom consists in knowing oneself — though this is hardest of all — so the first rule of mercy consists in being content with little, though this is just as hard; and only a man so contented and at peace will prove strong enough to show mercy to others.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Eagle's Nest: Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science to Art · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Though the least creature that can be known” becomes “though this is hardest of all,” and “to be sufficient for thyself” becomes being “content with little.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    And as the first order of Wisdom is to know thyself--though the least creature that can be known--so the first order of Charity is to be sufficient for thyself, though the least creature that can be sufficed; and thus contented and appeased, to be girded and strong for the ministry to others.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Eagle's Nest: Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science to Art (Oxford, 1872), Lecture V 'The Power of Contentment in Science and Art' (22 February 1872), Lecture V, §77.

    The frame is kept and both concessive clauses are changed. Ruskin's 'though the least creature that can be known' (oneself is the least thing one can know) becomes 'though this is hardest of all', and 'though the least creature that can be sufficed' becomes 'though this is just as hard'. 'Charity' is rendered милосердие (mercy), 'to be sufficient for thyself' becomes 'to be content with little', and 'to be girded and strong for the ministry to others' becomes 'strong to show mercy to others'. Probably through Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1904).

  8. 6. Воля бога в том, чтобы мы жили счастием и жизнью друг друга.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. The will of God is that we should live by one another’s happiness and one another’s life.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    I mean, and always have meant, simply this, Dora;--that the will of God respecting us is that we shall live by each other's happiness, and life; not by each other's misery, or death.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture VI 'Crystal Quarrels', Lecture VI, L.'s answer to Dora after the reading of the Samaritan mothers and Iphigenia.

    A close translation of the first half of Ruskin's sentence; 'respecting us' is dropped, and the second half ('not by each other's misery, or death') is not used. Tolstoy's Russian is faithful to the words he took. Probably through Nikiforov's Russian selection of Ruskin (Posrednik, 1902), which the Jubilee commentary names for Tolstoy's Ruskin.

  9. 2. Чтобы научиться терпению, нужно практиковаться столько же, как при изучении музыки, а мы между тем, как только учитель приходит, как только выпадает случай поучиться терпению, убегаем от урока.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. To learn patience, one must practice as much as in learning music; and yet as soon as the teacher comes, as soon as a chance falls to us to learn a little patience, we run away from the lesson.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Nearly as much practicing as music” loses “nearly,” and “losing our lessons when the master comes” is spelled out: when a chance to learn patience comes, “we run away from the lesson.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    And to practice patience. I can tell you, children, THAT requires nearly as much practicing as music; and we are continually losing our lessons when the master comes.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Чтобы научиться терпению, нужно практиковаться почти столько же, как и при изучении музыки, а мы между тем почти всегда манкируем, когда учитель приходит.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture IV 'The Crystal Orders', Lecture IV, opening dialogue on the rainy day, L. to Isabel.

    Changed in the last clause. Ruskin's 'nearly as much practicing as music' loses 'nearly'; 'we are continually losing our lessons when the master comes' becomes 'as soon as the teacher comes, as soon as a chance falls to learn patience, we run away from the lesson' (как только учитель приходит, как только выпадает случай поучиться терпению, убегаем от урока): Tolstoy spells out the image. The 1903 version kept closer ('почти', 'почти всегда манкируем, когда учитель приходит'). No printable.

  10. 6. Много вреда можно нанести неосторожной похвалой и осуждением, но главный вред наносится осуждением.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. Much harm can be done by careless praise and judgment, but the chief harm is done by judgment.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Political Economy of Art · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    You may do much harm by indiscreet praise and by indiscreet blame; but remember, the chief harm is always done by blame.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Много вреда можно нанести неосторожной похвалой и осуждением, но главный вред наносится осуждением.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Political Economy of Art (1857; later A Joy for Ever), Lecture I, Lecture I, section 1 'Discovery', on the criticism with which the public receives young painters' work.

    Close, word for word as in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 14 June). Tolstoy drops 'remember' and 'always'. Ruskin speaks of the public judging young painters; Tolstoy gives it generally. The saved file is the Ward Lock printing (1912).

  11. 7. Первая отличительная черта доброго и мудрого человека заключается в сознании, что он знает очень мало, что есть много людей гораздо умнее его, причем он всегда желает узнать, научиться, а не учить.

    Желающие же поучать или управлять не могут хорошо ни учить, ни управлять.

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. The first distinguishing mark of a good and wise man lies in the consciousness that he knows very little, that there are many people far more intelligent than he, and he always wishes to find out, to learn, and not to teach.

    But those who wish to instruct or to govern can neither teach nor govern well.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Crown of Wild Olive · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Well, that is the first character of a good and wise man at his work.
    To know that he knows very little;--to perceive that there are many above him wiser than he; and to be always asking questions, wanting to learn, not to teach.
    No one ever teaches well who wants to teach, or governs well who wants to govern; it is an old saying (Plato's, but I know not if his, first), and as wise as old.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Первая отличительная черта доброго и мудрого человека заключается в сознании, что он знает очень мало, что есть много людей гораздо умнее его, причем он всегда желает узнать, научиться, а не учить.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Crown of Wild Olive (1866), Lecture I 'Work', Lecture I, near the end, on 'the first character of right childhood', that it is modest.

    Close, as in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903). Ruskin derives it from the modesty of a child; Tolstoy drops that frame, 'at his work', and the closing aside ('it is an old saying (Plato's…)'), and 'always asking questions, wanting to learn' becomes 'always wishes to know, to learn'. The two paragraphs follow Ruskin's two sentences. The reviewer may prefer Tolstoy's version because 'at his work' is dropped.

  12. 8. У человека нет никаких данных для оценки, а тем более права для суждения о результатах жизни, полной безусловной самоотверженности, пока у него не явится смелости самому испытать такую жизнь, по крайней мере, на время; но я думаю, что ни один разумный человек не пожелает и ни один честный человек не посмеет отрицать то благотворное влияние, какое имели на его душу и тело хотя те случайные минуты, когда он забывал себя и отрекался от своей личности.

    Джон Рёскин.

    8. A man has no data for assessing, and still less any right to judge, the results of a life full of unconditional self-denial until he has the courage to try such a life himself, at least for a time; but I think that no reasonable man will wish, and no honest man will dare, to deny the beneficial influence that even those chance moments when he forgot himself and renounced his personality have had on his soul and body.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Bible of Amiens · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Periods of accidental privation from luxury, or exposure to danger” become “chance moments when he forgot himself and renounced his personality”; “resolute self-denial” becomes “unconditional.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    No man has any data for estimating, far less right of judging, the results of a life of resolute self-denial, until he has had the courage to try it himself, at least for a time: but I believe no reasonable person will wish, and no honest person dare, to deny the benefits he has occasionally felt both in mind and body, during periods of accidental privation from luxury, or exposure to danger.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    … ни один честный человек не посмеет отрицать то благотворное влияние, какое имели на его душу и тело хотя бы те случайные лишения в предметах роскоши или опасности, которым он подвергался.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Bible of Amiens (Our Fathers Have Told Us, Part I, 1880–85), ch. III 'The Lion-Tamer', Ch. III, §29, on the rewards of monastic solitude.

    Close until the last clause, which Tolstoy changed for the Circle. Ruskin's 'periods of accidental privation from luxury, or exposure to danger' (kept in the 1903 version: «случайные лишения в предметах роскоши или опасности») becomes 'those occasional moments when he forgot himself and renounced his personality' (те случайные минуты, когда он забывал себя и отрекался от своей личности). 'resolute self-denial' becomes 'unconditional self-denial' (безусловной самоотверженности). Ruskin is writing of monastic solitude. No printable.

  13. 2. Физически невозможно, чтобы истинно-религиозное понимание и чистая нравственность существовали в тех классах народа, которые не добывают своего хлеба трудами рук своих.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. It is physically impossible for a truly religious understanding and pure morality to exist in those classes of a people that do not earn their bread by the labor of their own hands.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LXVII · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    And it is physically impossible that true religious knowledge, or pure morality, should exist among any classes of a nation who do not work with their hands for their bread.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Физически невозможно, чтобы истинно религиозное ведение или чистая нравственность существовали в тех классах народа, которые не добывают своего хлеба трудами рук своих.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LXVII (1876), Letter LXVII, the aphorisms summarizing the book for St George's Company, no. 9.

    A close translation. The 1903 version has 'religious knowledge or' (ведение или); the Circle has 'understanding and' (понимание и).

    Translation note. The Jubilee text breaks the italics at the comma; the English sets the line as one.

  14. 1. Большинство деловых людей считают, что самым подходящим порядком вещей в этом мире является, попросту, тот, при котором огромная и беспорядочная толпа вырывает друг у друга всё, что может, и топчет детей и стариков в грязь и фабрикует различные негодные предметы при помощи рабочих, которых можно соблазнить и собрать, а впоследствии разогнать, предоставляя им свободно умирать с голоду.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. Most men of business consider that the most fitting order of things in this world is, quite simply, one in which a vast and disorderly crowd snatch from one another all they can, and trample children and old people into the mud, and manufacture all kinds of worthless articles with the help of workers who can be lured and gathered together and later dispersed, leaving them free to die of hunger.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Political Economy of Art · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Doing what work it finds must be done” becomes manufacturing “all kinds of worthless articles”; “bribe or inveigle together” becomes “lured and gathered together,” and “scatter to starvation” becomes leaving them “free to die of hunger.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    I know well how strange, fanciful, or impracticable these suggestions will appear to most of the business men of this day; men who conceive the proper state of the world to be simply that of a vast and disorganized mob, scrambling each for what he can get, trampling down its children and old men in the mire, and doing what work it finds _must_ be done with any irregular squad of labourers it can bribe or inveigle together, and afterwards scatter to starvation.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Political Economy of Art (1857; later A Joy for Ever), Addenda, Note 2nd 'Right to Public Support', Note 2nd, last paragraph.

    Close except in one clause. Ruskin's 'doing what work it finds must be done' becomes 'manufactures various worthless articles' (фабрикует различные негодные предметы); 'bribe or inveigle together' becomes 'entice and gather'; 'scatter to starvation' becomes 'disperse, leaving them free to die of hunger'. Ruskin's opening ('how strange … these suggestions will appear') is dropped. No printable.

  15. 5. Достоинство искусства и достоинство науки — в бескорыстном служении на пользу людей.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. The worth of art and the worth of science lie in disinterested service for the benefit of people.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Eagle's Nest · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The wisdom of art and the wisdom of science” become “the worth of art and the worth of science.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    I stated, in the first two, that the wisdom of art and the wisdom of science consisted in their being each devoted unselfishly to the service of men; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Eagle's Nest (1872), Lecture IX 'The Story of the Halcyon', Lecture IX, §172, recapitulating the first two lectures.

    Ruskin's 'the wisdom of art and the wisdom of science' becomes 'the dignity of art and the dignity of science' (достоинство); 'devoted unselfishly to the service of men' is kept. Whether 'wisdom' became 'dignity' in Tolstoy's hands or in Nikiforov's Russian, which he probably read, is not known. No printable.

    Translation note. The Jubilee text breaks the italics at the dash; the English sets the line as one.

  16. 7. Искусство только тогда на надлежащем своем месте, когда цель его — нравственное совершенствование. Задача искусства — поучать любовно. Если же искусство не помогает людям открывать истину, а только доставляет приятное времяпрепровождение, то оно является постыдным, а не возвышенным делом.

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. Art is in its proper place only when its aim is moral perfecting. The task of art is to teach lovingly. But if art does not help people discover truth, and only provides a pleasant pastime, then it is a shameful pursuit, not an exalted one.

    John Ruskin.

    Source not found yet .
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Искусство тогда только на надлежащем своем месте, когда оно подчинено пользе. Его задача — поучать, но поучать любовно; и оно является постыдным, а не возвышенным, когда бывает только приятно людям, а не помогает им открывать истину.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    Not found yet.

    The English was not found. The 1903 version (31 January) reads 'when it is subordinate to use' (когда оно подчинено пользе), which the Circle changes to 'when its aim is moral perfection'. Close in thought to Lectures on Art IV §98 ('it exists rightly only when it is the means of knowledge, or the grace of agency for life'), whose wording does not match.

    Searched: Every saved Ruskin text (Modern Painters I–V, Stones of Venice I–III, Lectures on Art, Eagle's Nest, Queen of the Air, Two Paths, Sesame and Lilies, Crown of Wild Olive, Ethics of the Dust, Fors IV–V, Unto This Last and Political Economy of Art, Frondes Agrestes) and 32 more Gutenberg Ruskin works (Seven Lamps, Aratra Pentelici, Time and Tide, Fors I–III and VI, On the Old Road, Arrows of the Chace, Val d'Arno, Lectures on Landscape, Ariadne Florentina, Our Fathers Have Told Us and others) for 'lovingly', 'teach'+'please', 'right place', 'subordinate to use'; archive.org full-text search for those phrases. Munera Pulveris, Laws of Fésole, St Mark's Rest, and Fors VII–VIII were not searched.

  17. 7. Относитесь хорошо к людям в расчете получить выгоду от их благодарности, и вы не получите ни малейшей отплаты за вашу доброту; но относитесь к ним хорошо без всяких корыстных соображений — и вы достигнете и благодарности и пользы. И так во всем: «Кто хочет душу свою сберечь — потеряет ее, а кто потеряет душу свою ради меня, тот обретет ее».

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. Treat people well in the reckoning that you will profit by their gratitude, and you will not receive the slightest return for your kindness; but treat them well without any mercenary considerations — and you will gain both gratitude and benefit. And so it is in everything: “Whoever wants to save his soul will lose it, and whoever loses his soul for my sake will find it.”

    John Ruskin.

    From Unto This Last · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Treat the servant kindly” becomes “Treat people well,” and the gratitude Ruskin withholds is promised: “all economical purposes will be answered” becomes “you will gain both gratitude and benefit.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: From one to all ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Treat the servant kindly, with the idea of turning his gratitude to account, and you will get, as you deserve, no gratitude, nor any value for your kindness; but treat him kindly without any economical purpose, and all economical purposes will be answered; in this, as in all other matters, whosoever will save his life shall lose it, whoso loses it shall find it.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Относитесь хорошо к людям в расчете получить выгоду от их благодарности, и вы не получите ни малейшей отплаты за вашу мнимую доброту; но относитесь к ним хорошо без всяких корыстных соображений, и вы достигнете и благодарности и пользы.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Unto This Last (1860–62), Essay I 'The Roots of Honour', Essay I, on the master and his domestic servant, the paragraph on the affections as a motive power.

    Changed in its scope and in its promise. Ruskin's servant becomes people in general ('Treat the servant kindly' becomes 'Treat people well', Относитесь хорошо к людям). 'you will get, as you deserve, no gratitude, nor any value for your kindness' becomes 'you will get not the least return for your kindness'; 'all economical purposes will be answered' becomes 'you will gain both gratitude and profit' (вы достигнете и благодарности и пользы), so the gratitude Ruskin withholds is promised. 'in this, as in all other matters' becomes 'And so in everything', and Ruskin's Gospel words are given in full, close to the Synodal wording of Matthew 16:25, with 'for my sake' (ради меня). The 1903 version (Thoughts of Wise Men, 19 July) has 'your sham kindness' (вашу мнимую доброту), which the Circle shortens to 'your kindness'. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904). The saved text is the Ward Lock printing (1912). No printable.

    Translation note. Matthew 16:25, where the KJV has “whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.” The Russian «душа» means both “soul” and “life”.

  18. 2. Если работа для вас главное, а плата вещь второстепенная, то вашим господином будет труд и его творец — бог. Но если работа для вас вещь второстепенная, а главное плата, то вы рабы платы и творца ее — дьявола и притом самого низкого и последнего из дьяволов.

    Рёскин.

    2. If the work is the chief thing for you, and the pay a secondary matter, then your master will be labor and its creator — God. But if the work is a secondary matter for you, and the pay the chief thing, then you are slaves of the pay and of its creator — the devil, and moreover the lowest and last of devils.

    Ruskin.

    From The Crown of Wild Olive · close to the original .
    Ruskin’s own words
    If your work is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master, and the lord of work, who is God. But if your fee is first with you, and your work second, fee is your master, and the lord of fee, who is the Devil; and not only the Devil, but the lowest of devils--the 'least erected fiend that fell.'
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Если работа для вас главное, а плата вещь второстепенная, то вашим господином является труд и его творец — бог. Но если работа для вас вещь второстепенная, а главное плата, то вы рабы платы и творца ее — дьявола, и притом самого низкого и последнего из дьяволов.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Crown of Wild Olive (1866), Lecture I 'Work', Lecture I, on the two classes of workers, after 'You cannot serve two masters'.

    A close translation of two sentences, clause by clause. 'the lord of work' and 'the lord of fee' become 'its creator' (его творец, творца ее); 'fee is your master' becomes 'you are slaves of pay' (вы рабы платы); Milton's 'least erected fiend that fell' becomes 'the last of devils' (последнего из дьяволов). Nothing inside the passage is left out. The 1903 version (8 June) is the same but for 'is' (является) where the Circle has 'will be' (будет). The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904).

  19. 5. «Не будь грабителем бедного, потому что он беден», — говорит Соломон. А между тем это «ограбление бедного, потому что он беден», — самое обыкновенное дело: богатый всегда пользуется нуждой бедного для того, чтобы заставить его на себя работать или купить то, что он продает, по самой низкой цене.

    Ограбление богатого на больших дорогах за то, что он богат, гораздо реже встречается, потому что грабить богатого опасно, бедного же можно грабить, ничем не рискуя.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. “Do not be a robber of the poor because he is poor,” says Solomon. And yet this “robbing of the poor because he is poor” is the most ordinary thing: the rich man always uses the poor man’s need to make him work for him, or to buy what he sells at the lowest price.

    The robbing of a rich man on the highroads because he is rich happens far more rarely, because it is dangerous to rob a rich man, while a poor man can be robbed without risking anything.

    John Ruskin.

    From Unto This Last · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s irony becomes plain statement: “especially the mercantile form of theft” becomes “the most ordinary thing,” and robbing the rich, rare as “less profitable and more dangerous,” is rare because “a poor man can be robbed without risking anything.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    And again, more strongly: "Rob not the poor because he is poor; neither oppress the afflicted in the place of business.
    This "robbing the poor because he is poor" is especially the mercantile form of theft, consisting in taking advantage of a man's necessities in order to obtain his labour or property at a reduced price.
    The ordinary highwayman's opposite form of robbery--of the rich, because he is rich--does not appear to occur so often to the old merchant's mind; probably because, being less profitable and more dangerous than the robbery of the poor, it is rarely practised by persons of discretion.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    «Не будь грабителем бедного, потому что он беден», говорит Соломон. Это «ограбление бедного, потому что он беден», составляет специальную промышленную форму грабежа, состоящую в том, чтобы пользоваться нуждой человека для приобретения его труда или собственности по возможно низкой цене. Противоположная форма обычного ограбления богатого на больших дорогах за то, что он богат, повидимому, как менее выгодная и более опасная, редко практикуется осторожными людьми.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Unto This Last (1860–62), Essay III 'Qui Judicatis Terram', Essay III, on Solomon's sayings about the merchant.

    Ruskin's irony becomes plain statement. 'especially the mercantile form of theft' becomes 'the most ordinary thing' (самое обыкновенное дело); 'taking advantage of a man's necessities in order to obtain his labour or property at a reduced price' becomes 'the rich man always uses the poor man's need to make him work for him or to buy what he sells at the lowest price'. In the second sentence Ruskin's 'does not appear to occur so often to the old merchant's mind; probably because, being less profitable and more dangerous …, it is rarely practised by persons of discretion' becomes 'is met much more rarely, because robbing the rich is dangerous, while the poor can be robbed without any risk' (бедного же можно грабить, ничем не рискуя); 'less profitable' is dropped. The changes are the Circle's: the version Tolstoy chose for Thoughts of Wise Men (6 September) keeps Ruskin's terms ('специальную промышленную форму грабежа', 'как менее выгодная и более опасная, редко практикуется осторожными людьми'). That version is one of the Ruskin thoughts the censor struck from the 1903 book, as the Jubilee commentary (vol. 40) reports from P. A. Bulanzhe's letter. Ruskin gives Proverbs 22:22 as a maxim of 'a Jew merchant' (Solomon), which Tolstoy makes 'says Solomon'. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904). No printable.

    Translation note. Proverbs 22:22 (KJV: “Rob not the poor, because he is poor”).

  20. 4. Ошибка всех добрых людей в наше время состоит в том, что, вежливо протягивая руку злым, поддерживая их в их зле и часто даже содействуя им, они надеются отвратить последствия зла.

    Утром они, чтобы удовлетворить сердечной потребности, помогают нужде двух или трех разоренных семей, а по вечерам обедают с разорителями этих семей, завидуют им и подготовляются следовать примеру богатого спекулятора, разорившего две или три тысячи людей. Таким образом, они разрушают в несколько часов больше, чем в силах исправить в течение десятков лет. Они подобны, в лучшем случае, людям, которые, пытаясь накормить голодающее население в тылу всеистребляющей армии, стараются всё более увеличить численность этой армии и быстроту ее передвижения.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. The error of all good people in our time is that, while politely holding out a hand to the wicked, supporting them in their evil, and often even assisting them, they hope to avert the consequences of evil.

    In the morning, to satisfy a need of the heart, they relieve the want of two or three ruined families, and in the evening they dine with those who ruined these families, envy them, and prepare to follow the example of the rich speculator who has ruined two or three thousand people. In this way they destroy in a few hours more than they are able to repair in the course of decades. They are, at best, like people who, while trying to feed a starving population in the rear of an all-destroying army, strive to increase still further the size of that army and the speed of its movement.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LXIII · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s devouring army, “always on the increase in mass of numbers, and rapidity of march,” becomes one the good people themselves “strive to increase still further”; “two or three destitute persons” become “two or three ruined families,” and “years” become “decades.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    For the failure of all good people nowadays is that, associating politely with wicked persons, countenancing them in their wickedness, and often joining in it, they think to avert its consequences by collaterally labouring to repair the ruin it has caused; …
    … and while, in the morning, they satisfy their hearts by ministering to the wants of two or three destitute persons, in the evening they dine with, envy, and prepare themselves to follow the example of, the rich speculator who has caused the destitution of two or three thousand.
    They are thus destroying more in hours than they can amend in years; or, at the best, vainly feeding the famine-struck populations, in the rear of a devouring army, always on the increase in mass of numbers, and rapidity of march.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Ошибка всех добрых людей в наше время состоит в том, что, вежливо протягивая руку злым, поддерживая их в их зле и часто даже содействуя им, они надеются отвратить последствие зла, побочно стараясь исправить причиненный им вред.
    Таким образом, они разрушают в несколько часов больше, чем в силах исправить в течение десятков лет, или в лучшем случае, тщетно кормя голодающее население в тылу всеистребляющей армии, стараются всё более увеличить численность этой армии и быстроту ее передвижения.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LXIII (1876), Letter LXIII, on the meaning of the St George's Company, before the call to separate from those who practise iniquity.

    Close in the first two sentences, changed in the last. The Circle drops 'by collaterally labouring to repair the ruin it has caused', which the 1903 version (13 October) kept (побочно стараясь исправить причиненный им вред). 'two or three destitute persons' become 'two or three ruined families', and the good dine 'with the ruiners of these families' (с разорителями этих семей); 'in years' becomes 'in decades' (в течение десятков лет). In the last clause Ruskin's army is 'always on the increase in mass of numbers, and rapidity of march'; in Tolstoy the good people themselves 'try to increase still more the size of this army and the speed of its movement' (стараются всё более увеличить численность этой армии и быстроту ее передвижения), as already in 1903; the Circle makes it a simile ('They are like, at best, people who…', Они подобны, в лучшем случае, людям) and drops 'vainly' (тщетно). The letter includes a piece dated 8 February 1876. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904). No printable.

  21. 5. Вы толкаете человека в яму и затем говорите ему, что он должен быть доволен тем положением, в которое поставило его провидение. Таково наше современное христианство. Вы говорите: «мы не толкали его». Да, конечно, мы до тех пор не будем сознавать всего, что делаем и чего не делаем, пока каждое утро не будем задавать себе вопроса, как нам в течение дня делать не то, что выгодно, а что свойственно человеку.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. You push a man into a pit and then tell him that he must be content with the position in which Providence has placed him. Such is our modern Christianity. You say: “We did not push him.” Yes, of course; we will not be conscious of all that we do and do not do until every morning we ask ourselves how, in the course of the day, we are to do not what is profitable, but what is proper to man.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Crown of Wild Olive · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “How to do the just thing” becomes doing “what is proper to man,” and Ruskin’s question, “How do you know what you have done, or are doing?”, becomes a concession: “Yes, of course; we will not be conscious of all that we do.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    You knock a man into a ditch, and then you tell him to remain content in the 'position in which Providence has placed him.' That's modern Christianity.
    You say--'We did not knock him into the ditch.' How do you know what you have done, or are doing?
    That's just what we have all got to know, and what we shall never know, until the question with us every morning, is, not how to do the gainful thing, but how to do the just thing; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Вы толкаете человека в яму и затем говорите ему, что он должен быть доволен тем положением, в которое поставило его провидение. Таково наше современное христианство.
    Да, конечно, мы до тех пор не будем сознавать всего, что делаем и чего не делаем, пока каждое утро не будем задавать себе вопроса, как нам в течение дня делать не то, что выгодно, а что справедливо, пока мы не станем настолько, по крайней мере, христианами, чтобы признать справедливость изречения магометан, гласящего, что «час справедливости стоит больше семидесяти лет молитвы».
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Crown of Wild Olive (1866), Lecture I 'Work', Lecture I, after Justice's question about the crossing-sweeper.

    Close in the first three sentences; the end is changed. Ruskin's 'not how to do the gainful thing, but how to do the just thing' becomes 'not what is profitable, but what befits a human being' (а что свойственно человеку); the 1903 version (10 November) kept 'what is just' (что справедливо). The Circle ends there, leaving out the maxim Ruskin closes with, 'One hour in the execution of justice is worth seventy years of prayer', which 1903 kept. Ruskin's question 'How do you know what you have done, or are doing? That's just what we have all got to know' becomes a concession, 'Yes, of course, we shall not be aware of all we do and fail to do'. 'ditch' is 'pit' (яма) in both Russian versions. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904). No printable.

  22. 3. Какие бы посредники ни стояли между тобою и приобретенным предметом, предмет этот сделан твоим братом-человеком, труд которого ты обязан уважать. Выразить же это уважение ты можешь только своим бережливым отношением к произведениям труда братьев и трудом для них.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. Whatever middlemen may stand between you and the object you have acquired, that object was made by your brother man, whose labor you are bound to respect. And you can express this respect only by your sparing use of the products of your brothers’ labor, and by your labor for them.

    John Ruskin.

    Source not found yet .

    Not found yet.

    The English was not found, and Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) has no version of it. Ruskin argues often that what one buys or wastes is other men's labour (Lectures on Architecture and Painting, Lecture II: 'when you spend a guinea upon an engraving, what have you done? You have paid a man for a certain number of hours'), but no passage found has the go-betweens, the 'brother', or respect shown by thrift and by work in return.

    Searched: Every saved Ruskin text (Unto This Last and The Political Economy of Art, Crown of Wild Olive, Ethics of the Dust, Sesame and Lilies, Two Paths, Eagle's Nest, Queen of the Air, Lectures on Art, Lectures on Architecture and Painting, Modern Painters I–V, Stones of Venice I–III, Frondes Agrestes, Our Fathers Have Told Us, Fors Clavigera IV–VI and the 1906 vol. IV, letters LXXIII–XCVI); also, read but not kept, Fors Clavigera I–III (Gutenberg 59456, 61591, 61634), Time and Tide (31196), A Joy for Ever (19980), The Seven Lamps of Architecture (35898), On the Old Road I–II (21263, 25678), and Munera Pulveris (1872, archive.org munerapulverissix00rusk), for sentences joining brother, fellow-creature or fellow-man with labour and buying, respect, honour, waste or thrift, and for 'go-between' and 'middleman'; Coit's The Message of Man; Jubilee vols. 40 and 42; archive.org full-text search for 'made by your brother', 'your brother man', 'respect for labour'. Nikiforov's Russian selections (1902–04) are not online.

  23. 5. Смотрите на все ваши дарования и знания как на средства помощи другим.

    Сильному и мудрому даны его дары не для того, чтобы угнетать, а чтобы помогать и поддерживать слабого.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. Look upon all your talents and knowledge as means of helping others.

    The strong and wise man has been given his gifts not in order to oppress, but to help and support the weak.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Political Economy of Art · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    That is the true and plain fact concerning the relations of every strong and wise man to the world about him. He has his strength given him, not that he may crush the weak, but that he may support and guide them.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Related · The Ethics of the Dust
    Briefly, the constant duty of every man to his fellows is to ascertain his own powers and special gifts; and to strengthen them for the help of others.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Рассматривайте все ваши дарования и знания, как средства, нужные вам для помощи другим.
    Сильному и мудрому даны его дары не для того, чтобы угнетать, а чтобы руководить и поддерживать слабого.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Political Economy of Art (1857; later A Joy for Ever), Lecture II, Lecture II, on the wise man's duty to the foolish, after the parable of the talents.

    Two sentences, the second certainly Ruskin's, the first probably from another work. The second is The Political Economy of Art, Lecture II: 'his strength' becomes 'his gifts' (его дары), 'crush the weak' becomes 'oppress', and 'support and guide them' becomes 'help and support the weak' (помогать и поддерживать слабого); the 1903 version (20 August) had 'guide and support' (руководить и поддерживать), so 'help' is the Circle's. The first sentence was not found in these words. The nearest is The Ethics of the Dust, Lecture VI (Related): the duty 'to ascertain his own powers and special gifts; and to strengthen them for the help of others'. It may instead summarize the talents argument of the same lecture, a page before ('thought, wit, and intellect … are indeed given to us, and, therefore, to be laid out for the Giver'). The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904). No printable.

  24. 4. «Познай самого себя» есть основное правило. Но неужели вы думаете, что можно познать себя, всматриваясь в себя? Нет. Вы можете познать себя, только присматриваясь к тому, что вне вас. Сравнивайте ваши силы с силами других, ваши интересы с их интересами; старайтесь думать о своих интересах как о чем-то второстепенном, преклоняйтесь перед достоинствами других, исходя из уверенности, что в вас, вероятно, нет ничего особенного.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. “Know thyself” is the fundamental rule. But do you really think it is possible to know yourself by peering into yourself? No. You can know yourself only by looking attentively at what is outside you. Compare your powers with the powers of others, your interests with their interests; try to think of your own interests as something secondary; bow before the merits of others, proceeding from the conviction that there is probably nothing special in you.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Try to understand what you appear to them, as well as what they appear to you; and judge of yourselves … relatively and subordinately” becomes “try to think of your own interests as something secondary; bow before the merits of others.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    L. My dear, it is the proverb of proverbs; Apollo's proverb, and the sun's--but do you think you can know yourself by looking INTO yourself? Never.
    You can know what you are, only by looking OUT of yourself. Measure your own powers with those of others; compare your own interests with those of others; try to understand what you appear to them, as well as what they appear to you; and judge of yourselves, in all things, relatively and subordinately; not positively: starting always with a wholesome conviction of the probability that there is nothing particular about you.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Related · The Ethics of the Dust
    … think how many people are noble, if you cannot be; and rejoice in THEIR nobleness.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    «Познай самого себя» есть основное правило. Но неужели вы думаете, что можно познать себя, всматриваясь в себя? Нет. Вы можете познать себя, только присматриваясь к тому, что вне вас. Сравнивайте ваши силы с силами других, ваши интересы с их интересами; старайтесь понять, чем вы кажетесь им и они вам, и судите о себе, как о чем-то второстепенном, исходя из уверенности, что в вас, вероятно, нет ничего особенного.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture V 'Crystal Virtues', Lecture V, L.'s answer to Mary's question about 'Know thyself'.

    Close at the beginning and the end; the middle is changed in the Circle. Ruskin's 'try to understand what you appear to them, as well as what they appear to you; and judge of yourselves, in all things, relatively and subordinately; not positively' was kept in 1903 (старайтесь понять, чем вы кажетесь им и они вам, и судите о себе, как о чем-то второстепенном); the Circle has 'try to think of your interests as something secondary, bow before the merits of others' (старайтесь думать о своих интересах как о чем-то второстепенном, преклоняйтесь перед достоинствами других). The bow before others' merits is close to Ruskin's words a few lines before (Related). 'the proverb of proverbs; Apollo's proverb, and the sun's' becomes 'the fundamental rule' (основное правило) in both Russian versions. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection, «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902); the Circle's list adds its third part (1904). No printable.

  25. 4. Выбросьте из вашего сердца и ума мысль познать всё на небе и на земле. Очень немного вообще существует такого, что мы можем когда-либо познать как относительно путей провиденья, так и законов существования. Но и этого немногого достаточно, вполне достаточно; стремиться к большему не благо для нас. И будьте уверены, что за пределами действительных нужд нашего скромного существования и того царства, которым каждому из нас предназначено управлять в невозмутимом самообладании, т. е. самим собою, своими мыслями, словами, поступками, всякое увеличение труда усиливает безумие, всякое увеличение знания усиливает горе.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. Cast out of your heart and mind the thought of knowing everything in heaven and on earth. There is, in general, very little that we can ever come to know, whether of the ways of Providence or of the laws of existence. But even this little is enough, quite enough; to strive for more is not good for us. And be assured that beyond the real needs of our humble existence, and of that kingdom which each of us is destined to rule in unruffled self-command — that is, ourselves, our thoughts, words, and deeds — every increase of labor increases madness, every increase of knowledge increases sorrow.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Eagle's Nest · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s plea to his hearers, “Gentlemen, I pray you very solemnly to put that idea … out of your hearts and heads,” becomes a command, “Cast out of your heart and mind,” and Tolstoy adds what the kingdom each of us rules is: “ourselves, our thoughts, words, and deeds.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Gentlemen, I pray you very solemnly to put that idea of knowing all things in Heaven and Earth out of your hearts and heads.
    It is very little that we can ever know, either of the ways of Providence, or the laws of existence.
    But that little is enough, and exactly enough: to strive for more than that little is evil for us; and be assured that beyond the need of our narrow being,--beyond the range of the kingdom over which it is ordained for each of us to rule in serene αὐτάρκεια and self-possession, he that increaseth toil, increaseth folly; and he that increaseth knowledge, increaseth sorrow.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Eagle's Nest (1872), Lecture V 'The Power of Contentment in Science and Art', Lecture V (22 February 1872), § 80.

    Close in its first three sentences; Tolstoy adds a gloss to the last. Ruskin's appeal to his Oxford hearers ('Gentlemen, I pray you very solemnly to put that idea … out of your hearts and heads') becomes a plain command: 'Cast out of your heart and mind the thought of knowing everything in heaven and on earth' (Выбросьте из вашего сердца и ума мысль познать всё на небе и на земле). 'The kingdom over which it is ordained for each of us to rule in serene αὐτάρκεια and self-possession' becomes 'the kingdom each of us is appointed to rule in untroubled self-possession', and Tolstoy adds what that kingdom is: 'that is, oneself, one's thoughts, words, and deeds' (т. е. самим собою, своими мыслями, словами, поступками). 'Beyond the need of our narrow being' becomes 'beyond the real needs of our modest existence'. Ruskin's two sayings after Ecclesiastes 1:18, 'he that increaseth toil, increaseth folly; and he that increaseth knowledge, increaseth sorrow', become 'every increase of labour increases madness, every increase of knowledge increases sorrow'. Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) has no version of it. The Circle's list names L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection of Ruskin, «Избранные мысли», vol. III (Posrednik, 1904), not consulted. No printable.

    Translation note. The last words echo Ecclesiastes 1:18, where the KJV has “he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.”

  26. 6. Никогда не ищите удовольствия, но будьте всегда готовы находить во всем удовольствие. Если ваши руки заняты, а сердце свободно, то самая ничтожная вещь доставит вам удовольствие, и вы найдете долю интересного и приятного во всем, что услышите. Но если вы обратите удовольствие в цель вашей жизни, то настанет день, когда самые комические сцены не вызовут у вас истинного смеха.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. Never seek pleasure, but always be ready to find pleasure in everything. If your hands are busy and your heart is free, the most trifling thing will give you pleasure, and you will find something interesting and pleasant in everything you hear. But if you make pleasure the aim of your life, the day will come when the most comic scenes will not draw true laughter from you.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LXV · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Never seek for amusement, but be always ready to be amused.
    The least thing has play in it—the slightest word, wit, when your hands are busy and your heart is free.
    But if you make the aim of your life amusement, the day will come when all the agonies of a pantomime will not bring you an honest laugh.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Никогда не ищите удовольствия, но будьте всегда готовы находить во всем удовольствие.
    Если ваши руки заняты, а сердце свободно, то самая ничтожная вещь доставит вам своего рода удовольствие, и вы найдете долю остроумия во всем, что услышите.
    Но если вы обратите удовольствие в цель вашей жизни, то настанет день, когда самые комические сцены не вызовут у вас истинного смеха.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LXV (May 1876), Letter LXV, section III, the seventh of 'St. George's orders' in Ruskin's answer to a group of schoolgirls.

    A close translation, sentence by sentence. 'Be always ready to be amused' becomes 'be always ready to find pleasure in everything'. 'The least thing has play in it—the slightest word, wit' becomes 'the most trifling thing will give you pleasure, and you will find a share of the interesting and pleasant in everything you hear' (долю интересного и приятного); the 1903 version (Thoughts of Wise Men, 16 December) had 'a kind of pleasure' and 'a share of wit' (своего рода удовольствие, долю остроумия), so Ruskin's 'wit' was replaced in the Circle. 'All the agonies of a pantomime' becomes 'the most comic scenes', and 'an honest laugh' 'true laughter'. Ruskin's next sentences ('Play actively and gaily …') are not used. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902). Ruskin's three sentences are printed here; the reviewer may keep Tolstoy's version because of the change of 'wit'.

  27. 3. Наши нравственные чувства так переплетены с умственными силами, что мы не можем затронуть одних, не затронув и других. Большой ум, при отсутствии нравственного чувства, источник великих бедствий.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. Our moral feelings are so interwoven with our intellectual powers that we cannot touch the one without touching the other as well. A great intellect, in the absence of moral feeling, is a source of great calamities.

    John Ruskin.

    From Modern Painters I · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    All our moral feelings are so in-woven with our intellectual powers, that we cannot affect the one without in some degree addressing the other; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Sesame and Lilies, Lecture III 'The Mystery of Life and its Arts'
    Ships and armies you may replace if they are lost, but a great intellect, once abused, is a curse to the earth for ever.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Наши нравственные чувства так переплетены с умственными силами, что мы не можем затронуть одних, не затронув и других. Великий ум, однажды искаженный, является навсегда проклятием земли.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Modern Painters I (1843), Part I, Section I, ch. VI 'Of Ideas of Beauty', § 4, 'How far beauty may become intellectual'.

    Joined from two works, and the second sentence changed. The first is Modern Painters I: 'All our moral feelings are so in-woven with our intellectual powers, that we cannot affect the one without in some degree addressing the other', kept closely, with 'in some degree' left out. The second comes from Sesame and Lilies, Lecture III, where Ruskin warns the gifted artist: 'a great intellect, once abused, is a curse to the earth for ever.' Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 26 February) already joins the two, the second still close to Ruskin: 'A great mind, once perverted, is for ever a curse of the earth' (Великий ум, однажды искаженный, является навсегда проклятием земли). The Circle rewrites it: 'A great mind, in the absence of moral feeling, is a source of great calamities' (Большой ум, при отсутствии нравственного чувства, источник великих бедствий). 'Once abused' becomes 'in the absence of moral feeling', which ties the second sentence to the first, and 'a curse to the earth for ever' becomes 'a source of great calamities'. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902). No printable.

  28. 5. Результаты ваших дел оценят другие; старайтесь только о том, чтобы сердце ваше сейчас, в настоящую минуту, было чисто и правдиво.

    По Джону Рёскину.

    5. Others will assess the results of your deeds; take care only that your heart be pure and truthful now, at this present moment.

    After John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s question, “Was the heart pure and true—tell us that?”, becomes a precept, “take care only that your heart be pure and truthful now, at this present moment,” and “What you were, others may answer for” becomes “Others will assess the results of your deeds.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    After John Ruskin’s own words
    But the main judgment question will be, I suppose, for all of us, "Did you keep a good heart through it?
    What you were, others may answer for,-- what you tried to be, you must answer for yourself.
    Was the heart pure and true--tell us that?
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Результаты ваших дел оценят другие; старайтесь только о том, чтобы сердце ваше было чисто и справедливо.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture V 'Crystal Virtues', Lecture V, the Lecturer to the girls, on 'the main judgment question'.

    Changed from a question into a precept, and signed 'after Ruskin'. 'What you were, others may answer for' becomes 'Others will judge the results of your deeds'; 'what you tried to be, you must answer for yourself' is left out; and Ruskin's question, 'Was the heart pure and true—tell us that?', becomes a command: 'take care only that your heart, now, at this present moment, be pure and true' (чтобы сердце ваше сейчас, в настоящую минуту, было чисто и правдиво). The 1903 version (Thoughts of Wise Men, 10 March, signed 'John Ruskin') has 'pure and just' (чисто и справедливо) and no 'now, at this present moment'; the Circle has Ruskin's 'true' (правдиво), adds the present moment, and signs it «По Джону Рёскину». The match rests on the two halves (what others answer for, and a heart pure and true); no closer passage was found in the saved Ruskin texts. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902). No printable.

  29. 7. Одно из определенных условий труда человека состоит в том, что чем отдаленнее цель наших стремлений, чем меньше мы желаем сами видеть плоды наших трудов, тем больше и обширнее будет мера нашего успеха.

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. One of the fixed conditions of man’s labor is that the more distant the aim of our striving, the less we wish to see the fruits of our labors ourselves, the greater and wider will be the measure of our success.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Seven Lamps of Architecture · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    And this the more, because it is one of the appointed conditions of the labor of men that, in proportion to the time between the seed-sowing and the harvest, is the fulness of the fruit; and that generally, therefore, the farther off we place our aim, and the less we desire to be ourselves the witnesses of what we have labored for, the more wide and rich will be the measure of our success.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Одно из определенных условий труда человека состоит в том, что полнота находится в соответствии между временем посева и жатвой, и потому чем отдаленнее вообще цель наших стремлений, чем меньше мы желаем сами видеть плоды наших трудов, тем больше и обширнее будет мера нашего успеха.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Seven Lamps of Architecture (1849), ch. VI 'The Lamp of Memory', § IX, on building for those who come after us.

    Shortened. Tolstoy keeps Ruskin's sentence closely and leaves out its middle, 'in proportion to the time between the seed-sowing and the harvest, is the fulness of the fruit', with the 'generally, therefore' that follows from it. The 1903 version (Thoughts of Wise Men, 12 August) keeps them (полнота находится в соответствии между временем посева и жатвой, и потому чем отдаленнее вообще цель). 'The more wide and rich will be the measure of our success' becomes 'the greater and wider'. The saved text is the Boston printing of Dana Estes (Gutenberg). The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902). No printable.

  30. 9. Каждый человеческий поступок тем почетнее, лучше и великолепнее, чем отдаленнее его последствия.

    Джон Рёскин.

    9. Every human act is the more honorable, the better, and the more magnificent, the more remote its consequences.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Seven Lamps of Architecture · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    An action that gains honor “by its regard to things that are to come” becomes one that is the more honorable “the more remote its consequences”: Ruskin measures an act by the doer’s regard for the future, Tolstoy by how far its effects reach.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Every human action gains in honor, in grace, in all true magnificence, by its regard to things that are to come.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Каждый человеческий поступок тем почетнее, лучше и великолепнее, чем больше он делается в виду будущего.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Seven Lamps of Architecture (1849), ch. VI 'The Lamp of Memory', Opening of § X.

    Changed in what an act is measured by. Ruskin's action 'gains in honor, in grace, in all true magnificence, by its regard to things that are to come'; in the Circle it is 'the more honourable, better and more magnificent, the more distant its consequences' (чем отдаленнее его последствия). Ruskin measures an act by the doer's regard for the future, the Circle by how far its effects reach. The 1903 version (Thoughts of Wise Men, 9 February) is close to Ruskin, 'the more it is done with a view to the future' (чем больше он делается в виду будущего), and goes on with his next sentence. 'In grace' becomes 'better'. It stands a few lines after the sentence Tolstoy gives as 4-15.7. No printable.

  31. 8. Если человек заслуживает похвалы, старайтесь не отказывать ему в ней, иначе вы не только можете этим отклонить его от настоящего пути, лишая его поддержки и одобрения, в которых он нуждается, но и сами лишаетесь радости воздать человеку должное за его труд.

    Джон Рёскин.

    8. If a man deserves praise, try not to deny it to him; otherwise not only may you thereby turn him aside from the true path, depriving him of the support and approval he needs, but you are yourselves deprived of the joy of giving a man his due for his labor.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Political Economy of Art · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s young painter, “if he does deserve it,” becomes anyone: “If a man deserves praise”; “the happiest privilege you will ever have of rewarding his labour” becomes “the joy of giving a man his due for his labor.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: From one to all ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    … and it is only by the fact of his seeming not to seek your approbation that you may conjecture he deserves it.
    But if he does deserve it, be sure that you give it him, else you not only run a chance of driving him from the right road by want of encouragement, but you deprive yourselves of the happiest privilege you will ever have of rewarding his labour.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Если человек заслуживает похвалы, старайтесь не отказывать ему в ней, иначе вы не только рискуете отклонить его от надлежащего пути, лишая его поддержки и одобрения, в котором он нуждается, но и сами лишитесь лучшего преимущества — воздать человеку должное за его труд.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Political Economy of Art (1857; reissued as A Joy for Ever, 1880), Lecture I, Lecture I, under 'Discovery', on how the public should treat the work of young painters.

    Ruskin speaks of a young painter, and of the praise his careful work deserves; Tolstoy makes it any man: 'if he does deserve it' becomes 'If a man deserves praise'. 'be sure that you give it him' becomes 'try not to refuse it to him'; 'by want of encouragement' becomes 'by depriving him of the support and approval he needs'; 'the happiest privilege you will ever have of rewarding his labour' becomes 'the joy of giving a man his due for his work' (радости воздать человеку должное за его труд). Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 14 July) has the same sentence nearer Ruskin, with 'you risk' (рискуете, 'run a chance') and 'the best privilege' (лучшего преимущества); the Circle has 'you may' (можете) and 'the joy'. The Jubilee commentary on that book names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), not found online, so the first changes may be Nikiforov's. No printable.

  32. 4. Нам нужно, главным образом, освободиться от нелепой мысли, будто небо исправит со временем наши крупные ошибки. Если вы неряшливо приготовляете какое-нибудь кушанье, то вы не рассчитываете, что провидение сделает его вкусным; и точно так же, если вы в течение целого ряда безумных лет ложно направляли свою жизнь, то не должны ожидать, что божественное вмешательство направит и устроит вас к лучшему.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. What we need above all is to free ourselves of the absurd idea that heaven will in time correct our great mistakes. If you prepare some dish carelessly, you do not count on Providence to make it tasty; and in just the same way, if through a whole series of mad years you have directed your life wrongly, you must not expect divine intervention to direct you and set you right.

    John Ruskin.

    From Sesame and Lilies, Lecture III 'The Mystery of Life and its Arts' · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Above all, get quit of the absurd idea that Heaven will interfere to correct great errors, while allowing its laws to take their course in punishing small ones.
    If you prepare a dish of food carelessly, you do not expect Providence to make it palatable; neither if, through years of folly, you misguide your own life, need you expect Divine interference to bring round everything at last for the best.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Нужно освободиться от нелепой мысли о том, что Небо может исправить наши ошибки.
    … и точно так же, если вы в течение целого ряда безумных лет ложно направляли свою жизнь, то не должны ожидать, что божественное вмешательство направит и устроит всё к лучшему.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Sesame and Lilies, Lecture III 'The Mystery of Life and its Arts' (1868), Lecture III, after 'as if there were, indeed, no other world than this'.

    Ruskin's two sentences, shortened, the second kept closely. 'Above all, get quit of the absurd idea' becomes 'We need, chiefly, to free ourselves from the absurd thought'; 'that Heaven will interfere to correct great errors' becomes 'that heaven will in time correct our great mistakes'; the clause that follows, 'while allowing its laws to take their course in punishing small ones', is left out. 'If you prepare a dish of food carelessly, you do not expect Providence to make it palatable' is close; 'through years of folly' becomes 'through a whole series of mad years'; 'to bring round everything at last for the best' becomes 'will direct and arrange you for the better' (направит и устроит вас к лучшему). On Every Day (21 February) repeats the passage with 'everything' (всё) for 'you', as Ruskin has it. No printable.

  33. 3. Мудрый человек всегда находит себе помощь во всем, потому что дар его состоит в том, чтобы извлекать добро из всего.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. The wise man always finds help for himself in everything, because his gift consists in drawing good out of everything.

    John Ruskin.

    From Modern Painters III · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Being helped “by everybody” becomes finding help “in everything,” and getting good “out of all things and all persons” becomes drawing it “out of everything”: the persons Ruskin names twice drop out.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    What help Turner received from this or that companion of his youth is of no importance to any one now.
    Of course every great man is always being helped by everybody, …
    … for his gift is to get good out of all things and all persons; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Frondes Agrestes: Readings in 'Modern Painters'
    Every great man is always being helped by everybody, for his gift is to get good out of all things and all persons.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Мудрый человек всегда находит себе помощь во всех, потому что дар его состоит в том, чтобы извлекать добро из всех и из всего.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Modern Painters III (1856), Part IV, ch. XVIII 'Of the Teachers of Turner', § 32, on what help Turner had from the companions of his youth.

    Ruskin's 'great man' becomes 'a wise man' (Мудрый человек), already in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 12 May). 'is always being helped by everybody' becomes 'always finds help in everything' (во всем); the 1903 version had 'in everyone' (во всех), Ruskin's sense. 'to get good out of all things and all persons' becomes 'to draw good out of everything' (из всего); 1903 had 'out of everyone and everything'. So the Circle drops the persons Ruskin names twice. The sentence also stands alone in Frondes Agrestes (§ 70), the selection from Modern Painters that Ruskin revised. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), not found online, so 'wise man' may be Nikiforov's. No printable.

  34. 6. Одно мы знаем или можем знать, если захотим, а именно, что сердце и совесть человека божественны, что в отрицании зла и признании добра человек сам является воплощенным божеством, что его радость в любви, его страдания в гневе, его негодование при виде несправедливости, его слава в самопожертвовании являются вечными, неоспоримыми доказательствами его единства с верховным властелином.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. One thing we know, or can know if we wish, namely, that the heart and conscience of man are divine, that in rejecting evil and acknowledging good man is himself divinity incarnate, that his joy in love, his suffering in anger, his indignation at the sight of injustice, his glory in self-sacrifice are eternal, incontestable proofs of his unity with the Supreme Ruler.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LIII · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “In his perception of evil” becomes “in rejecting evil,” and “his unity with a great Spiritual Head” becomes “his unity with the Supreme Ruler.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    One thing we know, or may know, if we will,—that the heart and conscience of man are divine; that in his perception of evil, in his recognition of good, he is himself a God manifest in the flesh; that his joy in love, his agony in anger, his indignation at injustice, his glory in self-sacrifice, are all eternal, indisputable proofs of his unity with a great Spiritual Head; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Одно мы знаем или можем знать, если захотим, а именно, что сердце и совесть человека божественны, что в отрицании зла и признании добра человек сам является воплощенным божеством; …
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LIII (Brantwood, Good Friday, 1875), Letter LIII, after 'in which we have chosen to live as swine'.

    The first half of Ruskin's sentence, its words changed in three places. 'in his perception of evil' becomes 'in the rejection of evil' (в отрицании зла); 'a God manifest in the flesh' becomes 'an incarnate deity' (воплощенным божеством); 'his unity with a great Spiritual Head' becomes 'his unity with the supreme Ruler' (с верховным властелином). 'his agony in anger' is 'his suffering in anger', and 'are all eternal' loses 'all'. Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 5 January) has the same wording and goes on with the rest of Ruskin's sentence ('that in these, and not merely in his more availing form … he is king over the lower animate world', and the hallowing of the Father's Name); the Circle ends at 'Ruler'. The Jubilee commentary on Thoughts of Wise Men names the source of its Ruskin: L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), not found online, so the changed words may be Nikiforov's. No printable.

  35. 8. Твердо знайте и глубоко чувствуйте, что вы должны каждый день вашей жизни посвящать благу других, делая для них всё, что можете. Делая, а не болтая.

    Джон Рёскин.

    8. Know firmly and feel deeply that you must devote every day of your life to the good of others, doing for them all that you can. Doing, not chattering.

    John Ruskin.

    Source not found yet .
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Твердо знайте и глубоко чувствуйте, что вы должны каждый день вашей жизни посвящать благу других, делая для них всё, что можете. Делая, а не болтая.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    Not found yet.

    Ruskin's English was not found. The Circle prints the thought word for word as Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) has it under 9 March; the Jubilee commentary on that book names the source of its Ruskin, L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), which is not online, so the Russian may be Nikiforov's rendering of a passage not yet identified.

    Searched: The saved Ruskin texts (Modern Painters I–V, Frondes Agrestes, The Seven Lamps, Stones of Venice I–III, The Two Paths, Unto This Last with The Political Economy of Art, Sesame and Lilies, The Crown of Wild Olive, Ethics of the Dust, The Queen of the Air, Lectures on Art, Lectures on Architecture and Painting, The Eagle's Nest, Our Fathers Have Told Us, Time and Tide, Fors Clavigera vols. 4–6) and Fors Clavigera vols. 1–3 (Gutenberg, read but not kept), for 'every day of your life', 'good of others', 'not talking', 'doing, not', 'all you can', 'feel deeply'; and archive.org's full-text search for 'doing, not talking', 'doing, not saying', 'every day of your life' and 'all that you can for them' with 'Ruskin'. Fors Clavigera vols. 7–8 are not on Gutenberg.

  36. 1. Все истинные мысли — живые мысли и проявляют свою жизнь в том, что способны питать и изменяться. Но изменяются они подобно дереву, а не облаку.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. All true thoughts are living thoughts, and they show their life in being able to nourish and to change. But they change like a tree, not like a cloud.

    John Ruskin.

    From Modern Painters V · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “All true opinions are living” becomes “All true thoughts are living thoughts,” and being “capable of nourishment; therefore of change” becomes being “able to nourish and to change”: Ruskin’s opinions take nourishment, Tolstoy’s thoughts give it. †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Let him be assured of this, that unless important changes are occurring in his opinions continually, all his life long, not one of those opinions can be on any questionable subject true.
    All true opinions are living, and show their life by being capable of nourishment; therefore of change.
    But their change is that of a tree--not of a cloud.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Все истинные мысли — живые мысли и проявляют свою жизнь в том, что способны питать и изменяться. Но изменяются они подобно дереву, а не облаку.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Modern Painters V (1860), Preface, Preface, on the changes of opinion over the seventeen years of the work.

    Close in its frame, changed in two places. Ruskin's 'opinions' become 'thoughts' (мысли): 'All true opinions are living' is 'All true thoughts are living thoughts'. 'show their life by being capable of nourishment; therefore of change' becomes 'show their life in being able to nourish and to change' (способны питать и изменяться): Ruskin's opinions take nourishment, Tolstoy's give it, and 'therefore' is gone. 'their change is that of a tree—not of a cloud' is kept ('they change like a tree, not like a cloud'). Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 6 February) has the same words, so the changes were made by 1903; that book's Ruskin came from L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), not found online, and they may be Nikiforov's. No printable.

  37. 1. Воздержание не означает подавления силы, не означает приостановки в добре, в проявлении любви или веры, но, наоборот, проявление силы духовной, препятствующей делать то, что человек считает дурным.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. Self-restraint does not mean the suppression of power, does not mean a halt in good, in the manifestation of love or faith, but, on the contrary, the manifestation of a spiritual power that keeps a man from doing what he considers wrong.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Stones of Venice III · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The power which governs the most intense energy, and prevents its acting in any way but as it ought” becomes “a spiritual power that keeps a man from doing what he considers wrong,” and “a subdued and imperfect energy” becomes “the suppression of power.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Now, observe: Temperance, in the nobler sense, does not mean a subdued and imperfect energy; it does not mean a stopping short in any good thing, as in Love or in Faith; but it means the power which governs the most intense energy, and prevents its acting in any way but as it ought.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Воздержание не означает подавления или неразвития энергии, не означает приостановки в добре, как, например, в проявлении любви или веры, но, наоборот, силу и энергию, препятствующую делать то, что человек считает дурным.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Stones of Venice III (1853), ch. I 'Early Renaissance', § VII, on Temperance as the safeguard of beauty.

    The middle is kept, the ends changed. 'Temperance, in the nobler sense' loses 'in the nobler sense'. 'a subdued and imperfect energy' becomes 'the suppression of strength' (подавления силы); Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 21 September) had 'suppression or non-development of energy', nearer Ruskin. 'a stopping short in any good thing, as in Love or in Faith' is close ('a halt in good, in the showing of love or faith'). 'the power which governs the most intense energy, and prevents its acting in any way but as it ought' becomes 'the showing of a spiritual strength that keeps a man from doing what he considers wrong' (проявление силы духовной, препятствующей делать то, что человек считает дурным): Ruskin's government of energy becomes restraint from wrong, already so in 1903 ('strength and energy that keeps …'), and the Circle adds 'spiritual'. Ruskin is speaking of colour and ornament, of which the moral virtue is the type. That book's Ruskin came from L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), not found online. No printable.

  38. 5. Тела мужчин и женщин, а тем более их души, не должны быть покупаемы или продаваемы, а также и земля, вода, воздух, потому что эти вещи — необходимые условия поддержания тел и душ людских.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. The bodies of men and women, and still more their souls, must not be bought or sold, nor must land, water, or air, because these things are the necessary conditions for sustaining human bodies and souls.

    John Ruskin.

    From Time and Tide, by Weare and Tyne · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Bodies of men, or women, then (and much more, as I said before, their souls), must not be bought or sold.
    Neither must land, nor water, nor air, these being the necessary sustenance of men's bodies and souls.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Тела мужчин и женщин, а тем более их души не должны быть покупаемы или продаваемы. А если это так, то точно так же не должна быть продаваема земля, потому что это — вещь, необходимая для поддержания тел и душ людских.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Time and Tide, by Weare and Tyne (1867), Letter XXIII 'Of the Just Tenure of Lands' (20 April 1867), Letter XXIII, § 150.

    A close translation of Ruskin's two sentences, made one. Ruskin's asides 'then' and 'as I said before' are left out, so no printable. 'Neither must land, nor water, nor air' becomes 'nor yet land, water, air' (а также и земля, вода, воздух); 'these being the necessary sustenance of men's bodies and souls' becomes 'because these things are the necessary conditions for sustaining men's bodies and souls'. Later Tolstoy narrowed it to land: On Every Day (11 June) and The Path of Life (ch. X, § II, no. 2) drop water and air and make the land a conclusion ('And if this is so, then land too must not be sold, because it is a thing necessary for sustaining men's bodies and souls').

  39. 2. Жестокость в наше время еще больше развивается вследствие тонкого поощрения себялюбия учением о том, что всё то, что считается злом, приводит все-таки к благу. Учение это практически ведет к тому, что мы, хотя и употребляем те же серьезные усилия, чтобы избежать всего для нас неприятного, однако самодовольно и спокойно следим за действием того зла, которое испытывают другие.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. In our time cruelty is developed still further by the subtle encouragement given to self-love by the teaching that everything considered evil leads, after all, to good. In practice this teaching brings us to the point where, though we make the same serious efforts to avoid everything unpleasant to ourselves, we watch complacently and calmly the working of the evil that others suffer.

    John Ruskin.

    From Sesame and Lilies, Preface of 1871 · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Our remaining satisfied in the contemplation of its ultimate objects, when it is inflicted on others” becomes “we watch complacently and calmly the working of the evil that others suffer,” and “the religious doctrine” loses “religious.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Cruel, partly through want of imagination, (a far rarer and weaker faculty in women than men,) and yet more, at the present day, through the subtle encouragement of your selfishness by the religious doctrine that all which we now suppose to be evil will be brought to a good end; …
    … doctrine practically issuing, not in less earnest efforts that the immediate unpleasantness may be averted from ourselves, but in our remaining satisfied in the contemplation of its ultimate objects, when it is inflicted on others.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Related · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Если вы сознательно не добры ко всем, то будете часто бессознательно жестоки ко многим, и это происходит отчасти вследствие недостатка живости воображения.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Sesame and Lilies, Preface of 1871, The counsel to young women, 'Then, secondly, I said, you are not to be cruel'; the preface dated Denmark Hill, 1 January 1871, printed as 'Preface to the Later Editions'.

    Ruskin's second counsel to girls: unless they are deliberately kind they will be cruel, 'partly through want of imagination', and more 'through the subtle encouragement of your selfishness by the religious doctrine' that all evil comes to good. Tolstoy takes the second cause and makes it a statement about cruelty in his time. He drops 'religious' before 'doctrine' and 'your' before 'selfishness'; 'will be brought to a good end' becomes 'leads after all to good' (приводит все-таки к благу); 'not in less earnest efforts that the immediate unpleasantness may be averted from ourselves' becomes 'although we use the same earnest efforts to avoid all that is unpleasant to us'; and 'our remaining satisfied in the contemplation of its ultimate objects, when it is inflicted on others' becomes 'we complacently and calmly watch the action of the evil that others suffer' (самодовольно и спокойно следим за действием того зла, которое испытывают другие). The words 'complacently and calmly' and the 'action of the evil' are not Ruskin's, whose point is the comfort of thinking about evil's final ends. Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 18 June) has Tolstoy's version of the sentence just before it (Related). The Jubilee list names L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selections from Ruskin (Posrednik, 1902 and 1904), not online; the changes may be Nikiforov's. No printable, for the changes.

  40. 5. По мере совершения мудрых дел всё более и более жизни прибывает к человеку.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. As wise deeds are done, more and more life comes to a man.

    John Ruskin.

    From Munera Pulveris · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    For every piece of wise work done, so much life is granted; for every piece of foolish work, nothing; for every piece of wicked work, so much death is allotted.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    По мере совершения мудрых дел всё более и более жизни прибывает к человеку.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Munera Pulveris (1872), ch. I, Definitions, § 10; in The Crown of Wild Olive, also Munera Pulveris … (Illustrated Library Edition).

    The first clause of Ruskin's sentence, its sense kept: 'For every piece of wise work done, so much life is granted' becomes 'In the measure that wise deeds are done, more and more life comes to a man'. Tolstoy leaves out the foolish work, which earns nothing, and the wicked work, which earns death. The Circle repeats word for word his Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 9 June), whose Ruskin the commentary of Jubilee vol. 40 traces to L. P. Nikiforov's Russian selection (Posrednik, 1902), not online. Munera Pulveris first appeared as four essays in Fraser's Magazine in the winter of 1862–63, as Ruskin's preface says.

  41. 5. Помните, что ничего нельзя делать прекрасного из соперничества, ничего благородного из гордости.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. Remember that nothing beautiful can be done out of rivalry, nothing noble out of pride.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    And remember, child, that nothing is ever done beautifully, which is done in rivalship; nor nobly, which is done in pride.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Помните всегда, что ничего нельзя делать прекрасного из соперничества, ничего благородного из гордости.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture VIII 'Crystal Caprice', Lecture VIII, the Lecturer's story of St. Barbara and the goddess Neith: Neith's answer to Barbara, who has boasted of her building.

    Close. In Ruskin the words are spoken by Neith, the Egyptian goddess of the Lecturer's story, to St. Barbara; Tolstoy gives them as Ruskin's own counsel. He leaves out the address 'child'; 'nothing is ever done beautifully, which is done in rivalship' becomes 'nothing beautiful can be done from rivalry' (ничего нельзя делать прекрасного из соперничества), 'nor nobly, which is done in pride' 'nothing noble from pride'. Tolstoy printed the sentence in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) under 12 April, beginning «Помните всегда» (Tolstoy's own version); the Circle drops «всегда». The commentary of Jubilee vol. 40 names L. P. Nikiforov's Russian «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902) as the source of his Ruskin there, and the Jubilee list of the Circle's sources names its third part (1904); earlier months did not find either online. No printable, because 'child' is left out inside the sentence.

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at the comma; it is set here as one span.

  42. 5. Если вы сознательно не добры ко всем, то будете часто бессознательно жестоки ко многим.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. If you are not consciously kind to all, you will often be unconsciously cruel to many.

    John Ruskin.

    From Sesame and Lilies, Preface of 1871 · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Perhaps you think there is no chance of your being so; and indeed I hope it is not likely that you should be deliberately unkind to any creature; but unless you are deliberately kind to every creature, you will often be cruel to many.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Если вы сознательно не добры ко всем, то будете часто бессознательно жестоки ко многим, и это происходит отчасти вследствие недостатка живости воображения.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Sesame and Lilies, Preface of 1871, The counsel to young women, 'Then, secondly, I said, you are not to be cruel'; the preface dated Denmark Hill, 1 January 1871, printed as 'Preface to the Later Editions'.

    Close, with one word added. 'Unless you are deliberately kind to every creature, you will often be cruel to many' becomes 'If you are not consciously kind to all, you will often be unconsciously cruel to many' (Если вы сознательно не добры ко всем, то будете часто бессознательно жестоки ко многим): 'unconsciously' (бессознательно) is added to balance 'consciously', and 'every creature', which in Ruskin takes in animals, becomes 'all' (ко всем). In Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 18 June) Tolstoy's version goes on with Ruskin's next words, 'Cruel, partly through want of imagination' (и это происходит отчасти вследствие недостатка живости воображения; Tolstoy's own version), which confirms the place; the Circle stops at the first sentence. June's 6-4.2 is the sentence after that, from the same page. No printable, because 'unconsciously' is added.

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at the comma; it is set here as one span.

  43. 8. Ум укрепляется или расслабляется чтением решительно так же, как тело свежим или гнилым воздухом.

    Джон Рёскин.

    8. The mind is strengthened or weakened by reading in exactly the same way as the body is by fresh or foul air.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LXXXV 'Unique Dogmatism' · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s test of judgment becomes a law of reading: “the sense, to a healthy mind, of being strengthened or enervated by reading,” as “definite and unmistakeable” as the sense of fresh or foul air, becomes “The mind is strengthened or weakened by reading in exactly the same way as the body is by fresh or foul air.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    And for the moral tendency of books — no such practised sagacity is needed to determine that.
    The sense, to a healthy mind, of being strengthened or enervated by reading, is just as definite and unmistakeable as the sense, to a healthy body, of being in fresh or foul air …
    Source text: archive.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Ум укрепляется изучением нужного и важного для человека и расслабляется изучением ненужного и ничтожного решительно так же, как тело укрепляется или расслабляется свежим или гнилым воздухом или пищей.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LXXXV 'Unique Dogmatism' (January 1878); vol. IV of the George Allen edition, 1906, Letter LXXXV, pp. 289–290, in Ruskin's reply to a critique in the Spectator of 22 September 1877, after 'And for the moral tendency of books'.

    Changed in its point. Ruskin claims that anyone can judge a book's moral tendency at once: 'The sense, to a healthy mind, of being strengthened or enervated by reading, is just as definite and unmistakeable as the sense, to a healthy body, of being in fresh or foul air.' Tolstoy drops 'the sense … is just as definite and unmistakeable' and both 'healthy', and states the effect itself: 'The mind is strengthened or weakened by reading exactly as the body by fresh or foul air' (Ум укрепляется или расслабляется чтением решительно так же, как тело свежим или гнилым воздухом). A test of judgment becomes a law of reading. Tolstoy reworked the thought again in На каждый день (20 January, no. 8; Tolstoy's own version) and in Путь жизни (1910, ch. XIX, § V, no. 3), where 'reading' becomes 'the study of what is needed and important' and 'air' 'air or food'. No printable.

  44. 1. Главный и самый обычный способ отрицать существование бога состоит в том, чтобы признавать всегда безусловно справедливым общественное мнение и не придавать никакого значения своему сознанию бога.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. The chief and most common way of denying the existence of God is to regard public opinion as always unconditionally right and to attach no importance to one’s own consciousness of God.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The fools’ “particular and chief way of saying ‘There is no God’” becomes “the chief and most common way of denying the existence of God,” and “God’s opinion is of no consequence” becomes attaching “no importance to one’s own consciousness of God”: God’s opinion becomes the knowledge of God within a person.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Recast in Tolstoy’s faith ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    It is only the fool who does wrong, and says he 'did it for the best.'
    And if there's one sort of person in the world that the Bible speaks harder of than another, it is fools.
    Their particular and chief way of saying 'There is no God' is this, of declaring that whatever their 'public opinion' may be, is right: and that God's opinion is of no consequence.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Правда — всегда правда, и зло — всегда зло. Только безумец, делая зло, говорит, что он делает это для чьего-то блага.
    Главный и особенный способ отрицать существование бога состоит в том, чтобы признавать всегда безусловно справедливым общественное мнение и не придавать никакого значения мнению бога.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture V 'Crystal Virtues', Lecture V, the Lecturer's answer to May, 'No, May, not a bit of it; right is right, and wrong is wrong'; text of the Illustrated Library Edition (Boston and New York: Colonial Press), which keeps the punctuation that Gutenberg's separate text (no. 4701) has lost here.

    Changed at the end. Ruskin speaks of fools: 'Their particular and chief way of saying "There is no God" is this, of declaring that whatever their "public opinion" may be, is right: and that God's opinion is of no consequence.' Tolstoy makes it general, 'The chief and most usual way of denying the existence of God' (Главный и самый обычный способ отрицать существование бога), and turns 'God's opinion is of no consequence' into 'to attach no importance to one's own consciousness of God' (не придавать никакого значения своему сознанию бога): God's opinion becomes the knowledge of God within a person. The change was made in stages. Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 14 November; Tolstoy's own version) keeps Ruskin's 'particular and chief' (Главный и особенный) and 'God's opinion' (мнению бога), and prints before it the Lecturer's preceding words, 'right is right, and wrong is wrong. It is only the fool who does wrong, and says he "did it for the best"'; Путь жизни (1910, ch. XXVII, § I, no. 1) goes further, 'that voice of God which we hear unceasingly in our soul' (тому голосу бога, который мы непрестанно слышим в душе своей). No printable.

  45. 2. Мощь дана человеку не для того, чтобы он давил слабого, а чтобы он поддерживал его и помогал ему.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. Might is given to man not that he may crush the weak, but that he may support him and help him.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Political Economy of Art · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Every strong and wise man” becomes simply “man,” the weak become one, and strength given that he may “support and guide them” becomes might given that he may “support him and help him,” so Ruskin’s guidance of the weak drops out.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: From one to all ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    They were made that wise people might take care of them.
    That is the true and plain fact concerning the relations of every strong and wise man to the world about him.
    He has his strength given him, not that he may crush the weak, but that he may support and guide them.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Political Economy of Art (1857; reissued as A Joy for Ever, 1880), Lecture II, Lecture II, part IV, 'Distribution', after 'What do you suppose fools were made for?'; the Ward Lock printing of 1912, with Unto This Last.

    Changed in one word and made general. Ruskin speaks of 'every strong and wise man', whose strength is given him 'not that he may crush the weak, but that he may support and guide them'; the weak are the fools that 'wise people' were made to 'take care of', and the next sentences make the strong man the guide and father of the poor. Tolstoy writes 'Power is given to man not that he should crush the weak, but that he should support him and help him' (Мощь дана человеку не для того, чтобы он давил слабого, а чтобы он поддерживал его и помогал ему): 'strong and wise man' becomes 'man', the weak become one, and 'guide' becomes 'help' (помогал), so Ruskin's fatherly authority over the weak drops out. No printable.

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at the commas; it is set here as one span.

  46. 4. Мудрое потребление гораздо труднее мудрого производства. Что двадцать человек с трудом произведут, то один легко может потребить, и вопрос жизни, как для каждого отдельного лица, так и для целого народа, состоит не в том, сколько он произведет, а в том, на что эти продукты тратятся.

    Люди обыкновенно утверждают, что личная практическая деятельность бессильна сколько-нибудь повлиять на изменение или задержку обширной системы современной промышленности или способов производства и торговли.

    Я же, вдумываясь в ту массу умных разговоров, которая входит в одно длинное ухо мира и выходит из другого, не производя ни малейшего впечатления на его ум, испытываю иногда непреодолимое желание попытаться весь остаток жизни употребить на то, чтобы молча делать то дело, которое я считаю разумным, и никогда ни о чем больше не говорить.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. Wise consumption is far more difficult than wise production. What twenty men will produce with difficulty, one can easily consume; and the question of life, for each individual person as for a whole nation, lies not in how much will be produced, but in what these products are spent on.

    People commonly maintain that individual practical activity is powerless to have the least influence in changing or checking the vast system of modern industry, or the methods of production and trade.

    But I, pondering the mass of intelligent talk that goes in at one long ear of the world and out at the other without making the slightest impression on its mind, at times feel an irresistible desire to try to spend the whole rest of my life doing in silence the work that I consider reasonable, and never again saying anything about anything.

    John Ruskin.

    From Unto This Last · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    … consumption absolute is the end, crown, and perfection of production; and wise consumption is a far more difficult art than wise production.
    Twenty people can gain money for one who can use it; and the vital question, for individual and for nation, is, never "how much do they make?" but "to what purpose do they spend?"
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Related · Fors Clavigera, Letter XXI
    In the first place, my correspondents write under the conviction,--a very natural one,--that no individual practice can have the smallest power to change or check the vast system of modern commerce, or the methods of its transaction.
    I, on the contrary, am convinced that it is by his personal conduct that any man of ordinary power will do the greatest amount of good that is in him to do; …
    … and when I consider the quantity of wise talking which has passed in at one long ear of the world, and out at the other, without making the smallest impression upon its mind, I am sometimes tempted for the rest of my life to try and do what seems to me rational, silently; and to speak no more.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Мудрое потребление гораздо труднее мудрого производства.
    Люди обыкновенно утверждают, что личная практическая деятельность бессильна сколько-нибудь повлиять на изменение или задержку обширной системы современной промышленности или способов производства и торговли.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Unto This Last (1860–62), Essay IV 'Ad Valorem', Essay IV, after 'consumption absolute is the end, crown, and perfection of production'; the source of Tolstoy's first paragraph.

    Joined from two works twelve years apart. Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) printed them as two entries under 8 August, each signed (Tolstoy's own version), in the same words as the Circle, which joins them under one signature. The first paragraph is from Unto This Last and changes Ruskin's middle sentence: 'Twenty people can gain money for one who can use it' (many can earn, few can spend well) becomes 'What twenty people produce with difficulty, one can easily consume' (Что двадцать человек с трудом произведут, то один легко может потребить), and 'never "how much do they make?" but "to what purpose do they spend?"' becomes 'not how much he produces, but on what these products are spent'. The second and third are from Fors Clavigera, Letter XXI (Related). 'My correspondents write under the conviction' becomes 'People usually assert' (Люди обыкновенно утверждают); 'modern commerce, or the methods of its transaction' becomes 'modern industry or the methods of production and trade'. Tolstoy leaves out the sentence that answers the correspondents, 'I, on the contrary, am convinced that it is by his personal conduct that any man of ordinary power will do the greatest amount of good that is in him to do', and begins the third paragraph with its second half. 'Wise talking' becomes 'clever talk' (умных разговоров), and 'I am sometimes tempted' 'I sometimes feel an irresistible desire' (испытываю иногда непреодолимое желание); 'to try and do what seems to me rational, silently; and to speak no more' is kept. No printable.

  47. 5. Не должны ли мы стремиться к такому идеалу народной жизни, при котором возвышение по ступеням общественной лестницы будет не столько пленять, сколько страшить лучших людей?

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. Ought we not to strive toward an ideal of national life in which rising on the steps of the social ladder will not so much allure as frighten the best people?

    John Ruskin.

    From Lectures on Art, delivered before the University of Oxford in Hilary Term 1870, Lecture … · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Ought we not rather to aim at an ideal of national life, when, of the employments of Englishmen, though each shall be distinct, none shall be unhappy or ignoble; …
    … shall be deputed to less fortunate and more covetous races; when advance from rank to rank, though possible to all men, may be rather shunned than desired by the best; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Не должны ли мы стремиться к такому идеалу народной жизни, при котором возвышение по ступеням общественной лестницы будет не столько пленять, сколько страшить лучших людей?
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Lectures on Art, delivered before the University of Oxford in Hilary Term 1870, Lecture I 'Inaugural', § 4, which Ruskin's later note calls 'the most pregnant summary of my political and social principles I have ever been able to give'.

    Shortened to one of four clauses. Ruskin's question has four 'when' clauses: no employment 'unhappy or ignoble'; 'mechanical operations, acknowledged to be debasing in their tendency, shall be deputed to less fortunate and more covetous races'; 'advance from rank to rank, though possible to all men, may be rather shunned than desired by the best'; and every citizen's aim the 'fulfilment of a duty which shall be also a birthright'. Tolstoy keeps the third: 'Should we not strive for such an ideal of national life in which rising by the steps of the social ladder will not so much attract as frighten the best people?' 'Though possible to all men' is left out, and 'rather shunned than desired' becomes 'not so much attract as frighten' (не столько пленять, сколько страшить). The same words are in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 13 May; Tolstoy's own version). No printable.

  48. 6. Мы очень много изучали и усовершенствовали в последнее время великое изобретение цивилизации — разделение труда; только мы даем ему ложное название. Правильно выражаясь, надо сказать: не работа разделена, но люди разделены на частицы людей, разломлены на маленькие кусочки, на крошки; так что та малая часть рассудка, которая оставлена в человеке, недостаточна, чтобы сделать целую булавку или целый гвоздь, и истощается на то, чтобы сделать кончик булавки или шляпку гвоздя. Правда, что хорошо и желательно делать много булавок в день: но если бы только мы могли видеть, каким песком мы полируем их — песком человеческой души, то мы бы подумали о том, что это тоже и невыгодно.

    Можно заковывать, мучить людей, запрягать их, как скот, убивать, как летних мух, и все-таки такие люди в известном смысле, в самом лучшем смысле, могут оставаться свободными. Но давить в них бессмертные души, душить и превращать в гниющие обрубки младенческие ростки их человеческого разума, употреблять их мясо и кожу на ремни для того, чтобы двигать машинами, — вот в чем истинное рабство. Только это унижение и превращение человека в машину заставляет рабочих безумно, разрушительно и тщетно бороться за свободу, сущности которой они сами не понимают. Озлобление их против богатства и против господ вызвано не давлением голода, не уколами оскорбленной гордости (эти две причины производили свое действие всегда; но основы общества не были никогда так расшатаны, как теперь). Дело не в том, что люди дурно питаются, но в том, что они не испытывают удовольствия от той работы, посредством которой они добывают хлеб, и потому они смотрят на богатство как на единственное средство удовольствия.

    Не в том дело, что люди страдают от презрения к ним высших классов, но в том, что они не могут переносить свое собственное к себе презрение за то, что чувствуют, что труд, к которому они приговорены, унизителен, развращает их, делает их чем-то меньше людей. Никогда высшие классы не проявляли столько любви и симпатии к низшим, как теперь, а между тем никогда они не были так ненавидимы ими.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. Of late we have studied much, and much perfected, the great invention of civilization, the division of labor; only we give it a false name. To speak correctly, we should say: it is not the work that is divided, but men, who are divided into particles of men, broken into little pieces, into crumbs; so that the small part of intellect left in a man is not enough to make a whole pin or a whole nail, and is exhausted in making the point of a pin or the head of a nail. It is true that it is good and desirable to make many pins a day; but if only we could see with what sand we polish them — with the sand of the human soul — we would consider that this, too, is unprofitable.

    One may chain men, torture them, harness them like cattle, kill them like summer flies, and still such men may in a certain sense, in the very best sense, remain free. But to crush the immortal souls in them, to choke the infant shoots of their human reason and turn them into rotting stumps, to use their flesh and skin for belts to drive machines — that is what true slavery is. Only this degradation, this turning of man into a machine, makes the workers struggle madly, destructively, and vainly for a freedom whose essence they do not themselves understand. Their bitterness against wealth and against the masters is called forth not by the pressure of hunger, not by the stings of wounded pride (these two causes have always had their effect; but the foundations of society have never been so shaken as now). It is not that people are badly fed, but that they take no pleasure in the work by which they earn their bread, and so they look on wealth as the only means of pleasure.

    It is not that people suffer from the contempt of the upper classes for them, but that they cannot bear their own contempt for themselves, because they feel that the labor to which they are condemned is degrading, corrupts them, makes them something less than men. Never have the upper classes shown so much love and sympathy for the lower as now, and yet never have they been so hated by them.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Stones of Venice, vol. II · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Men may be beaten, chained, tormented, yoked like cattle, slaughtered like summer flies, and yet remain in one sense, and the best sense, free.
    It is verily this degradation of the operative into a machine, which, more than any other evil of the times, is leading the mass of the nations everywhere into vain, incoherent, destructive struggling for a freedom of which they cannot explain the nature to themselves.
    Never had the upper classes so much sympathy with the lower, or charity for them, as they have at this day, and yet never were they so much hated by them: …
    We have much studied and much perfected, of late, the great civilized invention of the division of labor; only we give it a false name.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Мы очень много изучали и усовершенствовали в последнее время великое изобретение цивилизации — разделение труда, только мы даем ему ложное название.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Stones of Venice, vol. II (1853), chapter VI 'The Nature of Gothic', Ch. VI, §§ XVI, XIII, and XV, in that order: §XVI 'We have much studied and much perfected', the second half of §XIII 'Men may be beaten, chained', and the first half of §XV 'It is verily this degradation of the operative into a machine'.

    Joined from three sections of the chapter, rearranged: Tolstoy begins with §XVI (the division of labour, the pins), goes back to the second half of §XIII (true slavery), and ends with the first half of §XV (the workers' revolt), stopping at 'never were they so much hated by them'. Most of it is close, with these changes. 'Sand of human soul, much to be magnified before it can be discerned for what it is' is shortened to 'sand of the human soul', and 'we should think there might be some loss in it also' becomes 'we would think that this too is unprofitable' (это тоже и невыгодно). 'To smother their souls within them' becomes 'to crush their immortal souls' (давить в них бессмертные души); 'to make the flesh and skin which, after the worm's work on it, is to see God, into leathern thongs to yoke machinery with' becomes 'to use their flesh and skin for straps to drive machines', without Ruskin's echo of Job; and 'this it is to be slave-masters indeed' becomes 'this is true slavery' (вот в чем истинное рабство). 'More than any other evil of the times, is leading' becomes 'Only this … forces' (Только это … заставляет), and 'their universal outcry against wealth, and against nobility' becomes 'their bitterness against wealth and against masters' (Озлобление их против богатства и против господ). Tolstoy leaves out the passage between, on obedience as 'liberty from care' and the 'precipice' between the classes. He printed the same text again in На каждый день (9 February, no. 8; Tolstoy's own version) and in Путь жизни (1910). No printable.

  49. 6. Простота жизни, языка, привычек придает силу народу, а роскошь жизни, вычурность языка и изнеженность привычек ведет к слабости и погибели.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. Simplicity of life, of language, and of habits gives strength to a people, while luxury of life, affectation of language, and softness of habits lead to weakness and ruin.

    John Ruskin.

    From Inaugural Address delivered at the Cambridge School of Art, 29 October 1858 · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    What is the main lesson which, as far as we seek any in our classical reading, we gather for our youth from ancient history?
    Surely this — that simplicity of life, of language, and of manners gives strength to a nation ; and that luxuriousness of life, subtlety of language, and smoothness of manners bring weakness and destruction on a nation.
    You cannot charge me with any exaggeration in this matter; it is impossible to state the truth too strongly, or as too universal.
    Source text: archive.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Простота жизни, языка, привычек придает силу нации, а роскошь жизни, вычурность языка и изнеженность привычек ведет к слабости и погибели.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Inaugural Address delivered at the Cambridge School of Art, 29 October 1858 (Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, 1858), p. 22, after the causes of national decline, 'luxury, effeminacy, love of pleasure, fineness in Art, ingenuity in enjoyment'.

    Close, with three words shifted. Ruskin gives it as 'the main lesson … we gather for our youth from ancient history': 'simplicity of life, of language, and of manners gives strength to a nation; and … luxuriousness of life, subtlety of language, and smoothness of manners bring weakness and destruction on a nation'. Tolstoy keeps the two triads and the outcome. 'Manners' becomes 'habits' (привычек) both times; 'subtlety of language' becomes 'pretentiousness of language' (вычурность языка), and 'smoothness of manners' 'effeminacy of habits' (изнеженность привычек), a word Ruskin uses in the sentence before ('luxury, effeminacy, love of pleasure'). The lesson serves Ruskin's warning, on the page before, that 'Art has always destroyed the power and life of those who pursued it for pleasure only'. Tolstoy printed the thought first in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903, 15 January; Tolstoy's own version), with «нации» where the Circle has «народу», and again in На каждый день (11 May, no. 9). The commentary of Jubilee vol. 40 names L. P. Nikiforov's Russian «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902) as the source of Tolstoy's Ruskin in that book; earlier months did not find it online. The address was found by archive.org full text ('simplicity of life, of language'); George Allen reprinted it in 1879 (archive.org, not saved). No printable, because the words for manners are changed.

  50. 2. Никогда не вернешь потерянного времени, никогда не исправишь сделанного зла.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. You will never bring back lost time; you will never undo the evil that has been done.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Queen of the Air · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Wisdom never forgives.
    … the lost hour can never be redeemed, and the accomplished wrong never atoned for.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Никогда не вернешь потерянного времени, никогда не исправишь сделанного зла.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Queen of the Air (1869), III 'Athena Ergane', § 117, on Athena's wrath against those who resist her: 'Wisdom never forgives'.

    Close. Tolstoy takes the last two clauses of Ruskin's sentence about Wisdom (Athena), who 'never forgives' and 'avenges forever' the resistance offered her, and makes them a maxim of their own: 'the lost hour can never be redeemed' becomes 'you will never bring back lost time' (никогда не вернешь потерянного времени), 'the accomplished wrong never atoned for' becomes 'you will never put right the evil done' (никогда не исправишь сделанного зла). The same words stand in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) under 12 February; The Path of Life (Jubilee vol. 45) works them into a sentence of its own, unsigned: «Если бы только мы чаще вспоминали о том, что никогда не вернешь потерянного времени, никогда не переделаешь сделанного зла, мы больше бы делали добра». The commentary of Jubilee vol. 40 names L. P. Nikiforov's Russian «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902) as the source of its Ruskin; it was not found online. Faithful to the English: printable offered; a reviewer may judge 'atoned for' made «исправишь» (put right) enough to keep Tolstoy's version.

  51. 2. Вы должны радоваться, думая о том, что бог сотворил неизмеримо больше прекрасного, чем в силах охватить человеческий взор, но огорчаться при мысли, что человек сделал гораздо больше зла, чем в силах душа его постичь, а рука исправить.

    Джон Рескин.

    2. You ought to rejoice in thinking that God has created immeasurably more beauty than the human eye has the power to take in, but grieve at the thought that man has done far more evil than his soul has the power to comprehend, or his hand to repair.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “But not glad in thinking” becomes “but grieve at the thought,” and Ruskin’s climax, more evil “than his own soul can ever conceive, much more than his hands can ever heal,” becomes more “than his soul has the power to comprehend, or his hand to repair.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    You ought to be glad in thinking how much more beauty God has made, than human eyes can ever see; but not glad in thinking how much more evil man has made, than his own soul can ever conceive, much more than his hands can ever heal.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Вы должны радоваться, думая о том, что бог сотворил неизмеримо больше прекрасного, чем в силах охватить человеческий взор, но огорчаться при мысли, что человек сделал гораздо больше зла, чем в силах душа его постичь, а рука — исправить.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture IV 'The Crystal Orders', The Lecturer's answer to Violet, who has sighed that there are so many beautiful things we never see.

    Changed in two places. 'But not glad in thinking' becomes 'but grieve at the thought' (но огорчаться при мысли); and Ruskin's climax, more evil 'than his own soul can ever conceive, much more than his hands can ever heal', is flattened to 'more evil than his soul can grasp and his hand put right' (чем в силах душа его постичь, а рука исправить). 'More beauty' becomes 'immeasurably more' (неизмеримо больше), 'than human eyes can ever see' 'than the human eye can take in' (чем в силах охватить человеческий взор). In Ruskin the words are the Lecturer's (L.) to the girl Violet. The text is that of Thoughts of Wise Men (1903), 4 May, where the source named in the vol. 40 commentary is Nikiforov's «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (1902), not found online; the change may be the translator's. In На каждый день (Jubilee vol. 43, June 30) Tolstoy changed it once more: 'God has made immeasurably more beauty' becomes 'there is immeasurably more beauty in life' (в жизни неизмеримо больше прекрасного).

  52. 3. Мы должны всегда стараться отыскивать не то, что нас отделяет от других людей, а то, что у нас с ними общего.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. We must always try to seek out, not what separates us from other people, but what we have in common with them.

    John Ruskin.

    From Sesame and Lilies, Lecture III 'The Mystery of Life and its Arts' · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Whenever in any religious faith, dark or bright, we allow our minds to dwell upon the points in which we differ from other people, we are wrong, and in the devil’s power.
    At every moment of our lives we should be trying to find out, not in what we differ from other people, but in what we agree with them; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    В каждый момент нашей жизни мы должны стараться отыскивать не то, что нас отделяет от других людей, а то, что у нас с ними общего.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Sesame and Lilies, Lecture III 'The Mystery of Life and its Arts' (Dublin, 1868), Near the end of the lecture, after 'Helpful action, observe!' and the Pharisee's thanksgiving.

    Close. 'Not in what we differ from other people, but in what we agree with them' becomes 'not what separates us from other people but what we have in common with them' (не то, что нас отделяет от других людей, а то, что у нас с ними общего). Thoughts of Wise Men (1903), 21 July, keeps Ruskin's opening 'At every moment of our lives' (В каждый момент нашей жизни); the Circle replaces it with 'always' (всегда). In Ruskin the sentence is about religious faith: dwelling on the points in which we differ from others is 'the essence of the Pharisee's thanksgiving'. No printable, because the Circle's 'always' replaces words inside the sentence and the sentence runs on in Ruskin past the semicolon.

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at the commas; it is set here as one span.

  53. 5. Истина не познается путем разговоров, а только трудом и наблюдением. И когда вы овладеете одной истиной, — две другие, наверное, предстанут перед вами.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. Truth is not learned by way of talk, but only by labor and observation. And when you have mastered one truth, two others will surely appear before you.

    John Ruskin.

    From Mornings in Florence · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Truth is never learned, in any department of industry, by arguing, but by working, and observing.
    And when you have got good hold of one truth, for certain, two others will grow out of it, in a beautifully dicotyledonous fashion, (which, as before noticed, is the meaning of the branch in Logic's right hand).
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Истина ни в чем не познается путем разговоров, а только трудом и наблюдением.
    И когда вы овладеете одной истиной, — две другие, наверное, предстанут перед вами прекрасные, как первые листочки двусемянодольных растений.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Mornings in Florence (1875–77), The Fifth Morning 'The Strait Gate', On the Spanish Chapel, figure XIV, Polemic Theology.

    Shortened, with two words changed. 'In any department of industry' is dropped (Thoughts of Wise Men, 1903, kept it as «ни в чем», in nothing); 'by arguing' becomes 'by talk' (путем разговоров); 'two others will grow out of it' becomes 'two others will surely present themselves to you' (наверное, предстанут перед вами). The 1903 version keeps Ruskin's image, 'beautiful as the first little leaves of dicotyledonous plants'; the Circle drops it, and with it the growing out of one truth from another. In Ruskin the passage explains why Polemic Theology is the last of the divine sciences in the Spanish Chapel: truth is not settled by debate.

  54. 4. Мое воображение отказывается рисовать то блаженное время, когда кроткие наследуют землю. Но день этот неизбежно настанет, и надежды бедных не тщетны. Не силой, не властью, а духом своим призовет он кротких на суд свой и научит их путям своим.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. My imagination refuses to picture that blessed time when the meek shall inherit the earth. But that day will inevitably come, and the hopes of the poor are not vain. Not by might, not by power, but by his spirit will he call the meek to his judgment and teach them his ways.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter XCIII 'Invocation' · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The meek shall He guide in judgment” becomes “will he call the meek to his judgment,” so guidance in judgment becomes a summons to it; “the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever” becomes “the hopes of the poor are not vain,” and “My time fails me … in trying to imagine” becomes “My imagination refuses to picture.” †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    My time fails me — my thoughts how much more — in trying to imagine what this sweet world will be, when the meek inherit it indeed, and the lowliness of every faithful handmaiden has been regarded of her Lord.
    … the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever.
    Not by might, nor by power, but by His Spirit — the meek shall He guide in judgment, and the meek shall He teach His way.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter XCIII 'Invocation' (Christmas 1883); vol. IV of the George Allen edition, 1906, The letter's last paragraph, p. 438.

    Changed. 'My time fails me, my thoughts how much more, in trying to imagine what this sweet world will be, when the meek inherit it indeed' becomes 'My imagination refuses to picture that blessed time when the meek inherit the earth' (Мое воображение отказывается рисовать то блаженное время, когда кроткие наследуют землю); the handmaiden clause (Luke 1:48) is left out. 'For the day will come' becomes 'But that day will inevitably come' (Но день этот неизбежно настанет), and 'the expectation of the poor shall not perish for ever' (Psalm 9:18) 'the hopes of the poor are not vain' (надежды бедных не тщетны). In the last sentence, which joins Zechariah 4:6 to Psalm 25:9, 'the meek shall He guide in judgment' becomes 'he will call the meek to his judgment' (призовет он кротких на суд свой): guiding in judgment is made a summons to judgment. The thought is not in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903); the Jubilee list of the Circle's sources names Nikiforov's «Избранные мысли» of Ruskin, part III (1904), not found online, so the changes may be the translator's. The OCR of the saved page reads '^vill' for 'will' in the sentence 'For the day will come', which is therefore not excerpted.

    Translation note. “The meek shall inherit the earth” is Matthew 5:5. The last sentence draws on Zechariah 4:6 and Psalm 25:9, where the KJV has “Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit” and “The meek will he guide in judgment: and the meek will he teach his way.”

  55. 2. Все попытки добывать себе искусством средства к жизни являются одними из худших и вреднейших путей, избираемых людьми. В каждом поколении немного, очень немного таких людей, к словам которых стоит прислушиваться и произведения которых стоят внимания. И эти немногие будут проповедывать, петь и рисовать вопреки существующему спросу: они охотнее станут голодать, как стрекоза басни, чем перестанут петь; и даже если вы не хотите слушать их, то в силу милосердия должны бросить им несколько крох, чтобы поддержать их жизнь. Но люди, принимающиеся писать или рисовать, чтоб этим путем добыть себе средства к существованию, считают себя более благородными и менее презренными, чем обыкновенные нищие, тогда как они являются в сущности только шумливыми и вредными попрошайками. Я охотно готов платить за содержание наших бедных бродяг в рабочих домах, но не за то, что они жужжат мне в уши своими шарманками и карикатурами, соблазняют молодых девушек своими негодными повестями или приводят весь народ к гибели тысячами квадратных миль грязно напечатанной лжи, которой упиваются люди. Если люди не в силах добывать себе хлеб честным трудом, то пусть не кричат на улицах, а придержат свой язык и скромно протягивают свои праздные руки, и их милостиво накормят.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. All attempts to earn one’s living by art are among the worst and most harmful paths that people choose. In every generation there are few, very few, people whose words are worth listening to and whose works are worth attention. And these few will preach, sing, and paint regardless of the existing demand: they would sooner starve, like the grasshopper of the fable, than stop singing; and even if you do not want to listen to them, you ought out of mercy to throw them a few crumbs to keep them alive. But people who take to writing or painting in order to get their living that way consider themselves nobler and less contemptible than ordinary beggars, whereas in fact they are only noisy and harmful panhandlers. I am quite willing to pay for the upkeep of our poor vagrants in workhouses, but not for their buzzing in my ears with their barrel organs and caricatures, seducing young girls with their worthless tales, or leading the whole nation to ruin with thousands of square miles of dirtily printed lies, with which people intoxicate themselves. If people are unable to earn their bread by honest labor, let them not shout in the streets, but hold their tongues and humbly hold out their idle hands, and they will be kindly fed.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LXVII · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Those who write or paint for a living, “just by so much more contemptible than common beggars, in that they are noisy and offensive beggars,” become people who “consider themselves nobler and less contemptible than ordinary beggars, whereas in fact they are only noisy and harmful panhandlers”; “because they think it genteel” is left out, and the falsehood printed “every morning at breakfast” becomes lies “with which people intoxicate themselves.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    These born few will preach, or sing, or paint, in spite of you; they will starve like grasshoppers, rather than stop singing; and even if you don’t choose to listen, it is charitable to throw them some crumbs to keep them alive.
    But the people who take to writing or painting as a means of livelihood, because they think it genteel, are just by so much more contemptible than common beggars, in that they are noisy and offensive beggars.
    I am quite willing to pay for keeping our poor vagabonds in the workhouse; but not to pay them for grinding organs outside my door, defacing the streets with bills and caricatures, tempting young girls to read rubbishy novels, or deceiving the whole nation to its ruin, in a thousand leagues square of dirtily printed falsehood, every morning at breakfast.
    If people cannot make their bread by honest labour, let them at least make no noise about the streets; but hold their tongues, and hold out their idle hands humbly; and they shall be fed kindly.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LXVII (July 1876), The summary of the constitution of St. George's Company, under the second condition of Companionship, 'to earn our own living with our own hands'.

    Shortened and changed in several places. Tolstoy starts at Ruskin's 'the attempt so to live is among the worst possible ways they can take of injurious begging', made 'among the worst and most harmful ways people choose', the begging left for later. 'In spite of you' becomes 'in spite of the existing demand' (вопреки существующему спросу); 'they will starve like grasshoppers' becomes 'like the dragonfly of the fable' (как стрекоза басни: Krylov's «Стрекоза и муравей»). Ruskin's 'just by so much more contemptible than common beggars, in that they are noisy and offensive beggars' becomes 'consider themselves nobler and less contemptible than ordinary beggars, whereas they are in essence only noisy and harmful beggars' (считают себя более благородными и менее презренными … тогда как они являются в сущности только шумливыми и вредными попрошайками); 'because they think it genteel' is left out. 'Grinding organs outside my door' becomes 'buzzing in my ears with their barrel organs' (жужжат мне в уши своими шарманками), 'defacing the streets with bills' is left out, 'a thousand leagues square of dirtily printed falsehood, every morning at breakfast' becomes 'thousands of square miles of dirtily printed lies, with which people get drunk' (которой упиваются люди). Ruskin's sentence 'Whatever in literature, art, or religion, is done for money, is poisonous itself' is left out before the close, which Tolstoy keeps.

    Translation note. The Russian has «стрекоза», the dragonfly, which sings in Krylov’s telling of the fable known in English as The Grasshopper and the Ant.

  56. 3. Свой талант нельзя продавать. Продавая его, вы одновременно становитесь повинны в симонии и в проституции. Вы можете продавать свой труд, но не свою душу.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. You must not sell your talent. In selling it, you become guilty at once of simony and of prostitution. You may sell your labor, but not your soul.

    John Ruskin.

    From Time and Tide, by Weare and Tyne · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Genius must not be sold; the sale of it involves, in a transcendental, but perfectly true, sense, the guilt both of simony and prostitution.
    Your labor only may be sold; your soul must not.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Time and Tide, by Weare and Tyne (1867), Letter XV 'The Nature of Theft by Unjust Profits' (29 March 1867), § 81, on men of genius who set their price.

    Shortened. 'Genius' becomes 'your talent' (свой талант); 'in a transcendental, but perfectly true, sense' is left out; 'the sale of it involves the guilt both of simony and prostitution' becomes 'selling it, you become guilty at once of simony and of prostitution'; 'Your labor only may be sold; your soul must not' becomes 'You may sell your labor, but not your soul'. No printable, because words are left out inside the passage.

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at punctuation, at the full stops and the comma; it is set here as one span.

  57. 4. Как ужасен бы был мир, если бы не рождались постоянно дети, несущие с собой невинность и возможность всякого совершенства!

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. How terrible the world would be if children were not constantly being born, bringing with them innocence and the possibility of every perfection!

    John Ruskin.

    Source not found yet .
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Как ужасен бы был мир, если бы не рождались постоянно дети, несущие с собой невинность и возможность всякого совершенства.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    Not found yet.

    Not found in Ruskin. The same sentence stands in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) under 7 March, after Matthew 18:3–4, signed «Л. Т.»: the commentary of Jubilee vol. 40 says that in that edition the thoughts belonging to Tolstoy are signed «Л. Т.», the Posrednik printing having left some unsigned. The Circle signs it «Джон Рёскин», and the vol. 42 list of corrected attributions has no entry for it. The thought may be Tolstoy's own, wrongly signed in the Circle, or a Ruskin sentence from L. P. Nikiforov's «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902), which was not found online; neither is certain, so the signature stands.

    Searched: Every saved Ruskin text (Modern Painters I–V, The Stones of Venice I–III, Fors Clavigera, Sesame and Lilies, The Crown of Wild Olive, The Ethics of the Dust, The Eagle's Nest, Unto This Last, Time and Tide, The Queen of the Air, Lectures on Art, Mornings in Florence, The Two Paths, and others) and 24 more Ruskin books from Gutenberg (among them Arrows of the Chace, On the Old Road, A Joy for Ever, Proserpina, Love's Meinie, Lectures on Landscape, Selections from the Works of John Ruskin, The Harvest of Ruskin), and The Ruskin Birthday Book (1889, archive.org), for children together with innocence or perfection; Southgate, Tileston, and Coit; web searches.

  58. 7. Детство часто держит в своих слабых пальцах истину, которую не могут удержать взрослые люди своими мужественными руками и открытие которой составляет гордость позднейших лет.

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. Childhood often holds in its weak fingers a truth that grown men cannot hold in their manly hands, and the discovery of which is the pride of later years.

    John Ruskin.

    From Modern Painters, vol. I · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Which it is the pride of utmost age to recover” becomes “the discovery of which is the pride of later years”: in Ruskin old age regains the truth childhood held, in Tolstoy later years discover it. †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Our first and last coincide, though on different grounds; it is the middle stage which is farthest from the truth.
    Childhood often holds a truth with its feeble fingers, which the grasp of manhood cannot retain,--which it is the pride of utmost age to recover.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Детство часто держит в своих слабых пальцах истину, которую не могут удержать люди своими мужественными руками и открытие которой составляет гордость позднейших лет.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Modern Painters, vol. I (1843), Preface to the Second Edition (1844), on the painter's first and last stages: 'Our first and last coincide'.

    Close, with one change of sense at the end. 'Which it is the pride of utmost age to recover' becomes «открытие которой составляет гордость позднейших лет» (the discovery of which is the pride of later years): in Ruskin old age regains the truth childhood held, the point of his paragraph that 'our first and last coincide'; in Tolstoy later years discover it. 'The grasp of manhood cannot retain' becomes «не могут удержать взрослые люди своими мужественными руками» (grown people cannot hold with their manly hands). Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) has the same words under 29 January, without «взрослые». The commentary of Jubilee vol. 40 names L. P. Nikiforov's «Избранные мысли Джона Рёскина» (Posrednik, 1902), not found online, as the source of its Ruskin. No printable: 'recover' is changed.

  59. 2. Наука выполняет свою задачу не тем, что объясняет причины появления пятен на солнце, а тем, что выясняет законы нашей собственной жизни и последствия их нарушения.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. Science fulfills its task not by explaining the causes of the appearance of spots on the sun, but by making clear the laws of our own life and the consequences of breaking them.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Eagle's Nest · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Science does its duty, not in telling us the causes of spots in the sun; but in explaining to us the laws of our own life, and the consequences of their violation.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Eagle's Nest (1872), Lecture IX 'The Story of the Halcyon' (10 March 1872), § 206, the end of the lecture, on the home 'we would quit no more'.

    Close. Tolstoy takes the first of Ruskin's three sentences on the duty of science, art, and literature, almost word for word; 'telling us the causes' becomes «объясняет причины» (explains the causes). Not in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903). Faithful to the English: printable offered.

  60. 5. Науки — это пища для ума. И эта пища может быть так же вредна для ума, как и пища телесная для тела, если принимать ее не в меру. Так что и умственной пищи можно переесть и заболеть от нее. Для того, чтобы этого не было, надо так же, как и в телесной пище, принимать ее только тогда, когда это необходимо нужно.

    По Рёскину.

    5. The sciences are food for the mind. And this food can be just as harmful to the mind as bodily food is to the body, if it is taken immoderately. So one can overeat on mental food, too, and fall ill from it. To keep this from happening, one must, just as with bodily food, take it only when it is truly necessary.

    After Ruskin.

    From The Stones of Venice, vol. III · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s “Knowledge is mental food” becomes “The sciences are food for the mind,” and of his three misuses only the last, being “eaten to surfeiting,” is kept, as food “taken immoderately”; his question, “how much of it will enable us best for our work,” becomes a rule: take it “only when it is truly necessary.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    After Ruskin’s own words
    Knowledge is mental food, and is exactly to the spirit what food is to the body (except that the spirit needs several sorts of food, of which knowledge is only one), and it is liable to the same kind of misuses.
    It may be mixed and disguised by art, till it becomes unwholesome; it may be refined, sweetened, and made palatable, until it has lost all its power of nourishment; and, even of its best kind, it may be eaten to surfeiting, and minister to disease and death.
    Therefore, with respect to knowledge, we are to reason and act exactly as with respect to food.
    We are to ask, therefore, first, is the knowledge we would have fit food for us, good and simple, not artificial and decorated? and secondly, how much of it will enable us best for our work; and will leave our hearts light, and our eyes clear?
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Путь жизни
    Наука — это пища для ума. И эта пища для ума может быть так же вредна, как и пища телесная, если она не чиста, подслащена и если принимаешь ее не в меру.
    Для того, чтобы этого не было, надо так же, как в телесной пище, принимать ее только тогда, когда голоден, когда чувствуешь необходимость узнать, — только тогда, когда знание нужно для души.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Stones of Venice, vol. III (1853), ch. II 'Roman Renaissance', §§ XXV–XXVI, 'Knowledge is mental food'.

    A free version of § XXV, as «По Рёскину» (after Ruskin) says. Ruskin's 'knowledge' becomes «Науки» (the sciences), and 'the spirit' becomes «ум» (the mind). Of Ruskin's three misuses, knowledge 'mixed and disguised by art', 'refined, sweetened, and made palatable', and 'eaten to surfeiting', the Circle keeps only the last, «если принимать ее не в меру» (if it is taken beyond measure), and adds «Так что и умственной пищи можно переесть и заболеть от нее» (so one can overeat on mental food too and fall ill of it), from 'minister to disease and death'. The last sentence, «принимать ее только тогда, когда это необходимо нужно» (to take it only when it is truly needed), condenses § XXVI's question 'how much of it will enable us best for our work'. The Path of Life (1910) prints a fuller version, unsigned, that keeps 'refined, sweetened' as «не чиста, подслащена» (not pure, sweetened) and ends 'only when one is hungry ... when knowledge is needed for the soul'. The sentence before § XXV gave 9-23.4.

  61. 4. Никогда путь к доброму знанию не пролегает по шелковистой мураве, усеянной лилиями; всегда человеку приходится взбираться по голым скалам.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. Never does the way to good knowledge run over silken turf strewn with lilies; always a man has to climb up bare rocks.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Ethics of the Dust · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “No road to any good knowledge is wholly among the lilies and the grass” loses “wholly”: Ruskin’s road runs partly among the lilies, Tolstoy’s never; “rough climbing” becomes climbing “up bare rocks,” and the play on the name of Lily, to whom the lecturer speaks, is lost. †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Well, Lily, we must go through a little dreadfulness, that's a fact: no road to any good knowledge is wholly among the lilies and the grass; there is rough climbing to be done always.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Никогда путь к доброму знанию не пролегает по шелковистой мураве, усеянной лилиями; всегда человеку приходится взбираться по голым скалам.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Ethics of the Dust (1866), Lecture 4 'The Crystal Orders', the Old Lecturer's answer to Lily, who finds the books on crystals 'so dreadful'.

    Changed in two places. Ruskin says no road to good knowledge is 'wholly among the lilies and the grass'; Tolstoy says it never runs «по шелковистой мураве, усеянной лилиями» (over silken turf strewn with lilies), without 'wholly'. 'There is rough climbing to be done always' becomes «всегда человеку приходится взбираться по голым скалам» (one always has to climb over bare rocks). Out of the dialogue, the play on the name of Lily, to whom the lecturer speaks, is lost. The same words stand in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) under 24 December; На каждый день (Jubilee vol. 43) repeats them signed «Рескин», and The Path of Life (ch. XX «Усилие», § I) has «усеянной цветами» (strewn with flowers). The same lecture gave August's 8-15.2.

  62. 2. Странно думать, что науки могут когда-нибудь быть враждебны религии. Науки, если они тщеславны, становятся враждебны не только религии, но и истине; истинная же наука не только не враждебна религии, но всегда содействует ей.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. It is strange to think that the sciences could ever be hostile to religion. The sciences, if they are vain, become hostile not only to religion but to truth as well; true science, on the other hand, is not only not hostile to religion but always furthers it.

    John Ruskin.

    From Gothic Architecture and the Oxford Museum, letter to H. W. Acland · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ruskin’s image of true science, “the path-maker among the mountains for the feet of those who publish peace,” kept in Tolstoy’s 1903 version, becomes plain statement: true science “always furthers” religion; “physical science,” also kept in 1903, becomes “the sciences.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    How strange it seems that physical science should ever have been thought adverse to religion!
    The pride of physical science is, indeed, adverse, like every other pride, both to religion and truth; but sincerity of science, so far from being hostile, is the path-maker among the mountains for the feet of those who publish peace.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Странно думать, что физические науки могут когда-нибудь быть враждебны религии.
    Науки, как и всё тщеславное, враждебны не только религии, но и истине; истинная же наука не только не враждебна религии, но и прокладывает в горах тропинку для идущих вещать мир.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Gothic Architecture and the Oxford Museum, letter to H. W. Acland (20 January 1859), first printed in H. W. Acland and J. Ruskin, The Oxford Museum (1859), pp. 60–90; here from Arrows of the Chace, vol. I (1880), section VI 'Architecture'.

    Changed, and changed again between 1903 and the Circle. Ruskin finds it strange that physical science 'should ever have been thought adverse to religion': the error is people's opinion of science. Tolstoy finds it strange that sciences «могут когда-нибудь быть враждебны религии» (could ever be hostile to religion). 'The pride of physical science is, indeed, adverse, like every other pride, both to religion and truth' becomes «Науки, если они тщеславны, становятся враждебны не только религии, но и истине» (sciences, if they are vain, become hostile not only to religion but to truth); 'sincerity of science, so far from being hostile' becomes «истинная же наука не только не враждебна религии» (true science is not only not hostile to religion); and Ruskin's image, 'the path-maker among the mountains for the feet of those who publish peace' (after Isaiah 52:7), becomes «всегда содействует ей» (always assists it). Thoughts of Wise Men (1903), 27 October, is nearer the English: it keeps «физические науки» (physical sciences), «как и всё тщеславное» (like everything vain) for 'like every other pride', and the image, «прокладывает в горах тропинку для идущих вещать мир».

  63. 4. Знание бесконечно, и человек, самый ученый, по мнению людей, так же далек от истинного знания, как и безграмотный крестьянин.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. Knowledge is infinite, and the man who is most learned in people’s opinion is as far from true knowledge as an illiterate peasant.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Stones of Venice, vol. III · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Just as far from knowing anything as he ought to know it” becomes “as far from true knowledge”: Ruskin’s point, that no one knows any single thing as it ought to be known, becomes a distance from true knowledge. †

    † An intermediate translation may have made this change.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    We talk of learned and ignorant men, as if there were a certain quantity of knowledge, which to possess was to be learned, and which not to possess was to be ignorant; instead of considering that knowledge is infinite, and that the man most learned in human estimation is just as far from knowing anything as he ought to know it, as the unlettered peasant.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Знание бесконечно, и человек, самый ученый, по мнению людей, так же далек от истинного знания, как и безграмотный крестьянин.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Stones of Venice, vol. III (1853), ch. II 'Roman Renaissance', § XXIV, on 'the true nature of knowledge itself'.

    Close except at one point. Tolstoy takes the clause on its own: 'knowledge is infinite, and ... the man most learned in human estimation' becomes «Знание бесконечно, и человек, самый ученый, по мнению людей»; but 'is just as far from knowing anything as he ought to know it' becomes «так же далек от истинного знания» (is as far from true knowledge): Ruskin's point, that no one knows any single thing as it ought to be known, becomes a distance from 'true knowledge'. 'The unlettered peasant' is «безграмотный крестьянин». The same words, unchanged, stand among the last thoughts of Thoughts of Wise Men (1903), 31 December. The next section of the chapter gave 9-9.5.

  64. 1. Помните всегда великую и неизменную истину, что то, что вы имеете, не может иметь никто другой и что каждая частица любого вещества, которым вы пользуетесь или которое вы потребляете, представляет собою частицу человеческой жизни.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. Always remember the great and unchanging truth that what you have, no one else can have, and that every particle of any substance you use or consume is a particle of human life.

    John Ruskin.

    From Unto This Last · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Care in nowise to make more of money, but care to make much of it; remembering always the great, palpable, inevitable fact--the rule and root of all economy--that what one person has, another cannot have; and that every atom of substance, of whatever kind, used or consumed, is so much human life spent; which, if it issue in the saving present life, or gaining more, is well spent, but if not, is either so much life prevented, or so much slain.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Мысли мудрых людей на каждый день
    Помните всегда великую и неизменную истину — правило и основу всей экономии, что то, что́ вы имеете, не может иметь никто другой и что каждый атом любого вещества, которым вы пользуетесь или который вы потребляете, представляет собою частицу человеческой жизни.
    Если она идет на поддержание или спасение настоящей жизни или на развитие и создание большей жизни, то потреблена хорошо, в противном же случае она или задерживает развитие жизни или губит ее.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Unto This Last (Cornhill Magazine, 1860; book, 1862), Essay IV 'Ad Valorem', near the end of the essay, after 'all true economy is "Law of the house"'.

    Shortened, with some words changed. Thoughts of Wise Men (1903), 21 December, gives the sentence from 'remembering always' to its end; for the Circle Tolstoy cut 'the rule and root of all economy' and the closing clause on life well spent, prevented, or slain. 'The great, palpable, inevitable fact' becomes «великую и неизменную истину» (the great and unchanging truth); 'what one person has, another cannot have' becomes «то, что вы имеете, не может иметь никто другой» (what you have, no one else can have); 'every atom of substance' is «каждый атом» in 1903 and «каждая частица» (every particle) in the Circle; 'is so much human life spent' becomes «представляет собою частицу человеческой жизни» (is a particle of human life), without 'spent'.

  65. 4. Да будет каждая утренняя заря для вас как бы началом жизни, а каждый закат солнца как бы концом ее, и пусть каждая из этих коротких жизней оставляет по себе след любовного дела, совершенного для других, и доброго усилия над собой.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. Let every dawn be for you as it were the beginning of life, and every sunset as it were its end; and let each of these short lives leave behind it the mark of some loving deed done for others and some good effort made upon yourself.

    John Ruskin.

    From Lectures on Art, delivered at Oxford in Hilary Term 1870, Lecture IV 'The Relation of Ar… · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Let every dawn of morning be to you as the beginning of life, and every setting sun be to you as its close:--then let every one of these short lives leave its sure record of some kindly thing done for others--some goodly strength or knowledge gained for yourselves; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Lectures on Art, delivered at Oxford in Hilary Term 1870, Lecture IV 'The Relation of Art to Morals', End of Lecture IV.

    Close in the first half; Ruskin's 'some goodly strength or knowledge gained for yourselves' becomes 'a good effort over oneself', and 'sure' is dropped.

  66. 3. Мудрому человеку так же несвойственно рассуждать много о природе существ, стоящих выше его, как и о природе существ ниже его. Слишком нескромно предполагать, что человек может постичь первых, как и слишком унизительно предполагать, что он может всецело сосредоточивать свое внимание на вторых. Признавать свое вечное относительное величие и ничтожество, познавать и себя и свое место в природе, быть довольным своей подчиненностью богу, не в силах будучи постичь его, и управлять низшими тварями с любовью и добротой, не разделяя их животных страстей и не подражая им, — вот что значит быть смиренным по отношению к богу, добрым по отношению к его тварям и мудрым по отношению к себе.

    Джон Рёскин.

    3. It is as unbecoming for a wise man to reason much about the nature of beings above him as about the nature of beings below him. It is too immodest to suppose that man can comprehend the first, and too degrading to suppose that he may wholly fix his attention on the second. To acknowledge his eternal relative greatness and nothingness, to know both himself and his place in nature, to be content with his subjection to God while unable to comprehend him, and to rule the lower creatures with love and kindness, neither sharing their animal passions nor imitating them — that is what it means to be humble toward God, kind toward his creatures, and wise toward oneself.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Eagle's Nest · close to the original .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    It is as little the part of a wise man to reflect much on the nature of beings above him, as of beings beneath him. It is immodest to suppose that he can conceive the one, and degrading to suppose that he should be busied with the other.
    To recognize his everlasting inferiority, and his everlasting greatness; to know himself, and his place; to be content to submit to God without understanding Him; and to rule the lower creation with sympathy and kindness, yet neither sharing the passion of the wild beast, nor imitating the science of the Insect;--this you will find is to be modest towards God, gentle to His creatures, and wise for himself.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Eagle's Nest (1872), Lecture II 'The Function of Wisdom', §30, Lecture II, end of §30.

    Close, sentence for sentence. Small changes: 'nor imitating the science of the Insect' becomes 'not imitating them'; 'modest towards God, gentle to His creatures' becomes 'humble... kind'.

  67. 1. Остерегайтесь людей, отговаривающих вас от стремления к добру на том основании, что совершенство недостижимо.

    Никогда не считайте бесполезным подчиняться влиянию, которое может пробудить в вас благородные чувства.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. Beware of those who would talk you out of striving after good on the ground that perfection cannot be reached.

    Never think it useless to yield to an influence that can awaken noble feelings in you.

    John Ruskin.

    Source not found yet .

    Not found yet.

    Not located. Tolstoy's Ruskin thoughts came largely through L. P. Nikiforov's Russian 'Избранные мысли' (Posrednik, 1904), which ranges over the whole of Ruskin's work, including Fors Clavigera.

    Searched: All Ruskin texts on Gutenberg (about 70, including Modern Painters I-V, Stones of Venice, Seven Lamps, Sesame and Lilies, Unto This Last, Crown of Wild Olive, Ethics of the Dust, Time and Tide, Fors Clavigera volumes, Lectures on Art, Eagle's Nest, Val d'Arno, Selections, Frondes Agrestes, The Harvest of Ruskin), regex search for perfect* near impossible/unattainable/hopeless, 'beware of', 'noble emotion', 'discourage'.

  68. 5. Душа человека есть зеркало, в котором можно видеть образ божественного разума.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. The soul of man is a mirror in which the image of the divine reason may be seen.

    John Ruskin.

    From Modern Painters, vol. V · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    So that the soul of man is still a mirror, wherein may be seen, darkly, the image of the mind of God.
    … the soul of man is a mirror of the mind of God. A mirror dark, distorted, broken, use what blameful words you please of its state; yet in the main, a true mirror, out of which alone, and by which alone, we can know anything of God at all.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Modern Painters, vol. V (1860), Part IX, chapter I 'The Dark Mirror', §11, Part IX, ch. I, §11.

    Close to the first excerpt, minus 'still' and 'darkly': Ruskin's 'the soul of man is still a mirror, wherein may be seen, darkly, the image of the mind of God' is the sentence Tolstoy translates.

  69. 6. Каждое слово имеет только то значение, в каком может воспринять его слушатель. Вы не уясните значения чести человеку бесчестному, или любви тому, кто чужд ей. Стараясь низвести значение этих слов до их понимания, вы дойдете только до того, что у вас не будет больше слов для выражения и чести и любви.

    Джон Рёскин.

    6. Every word has only the meaning in which the listener is able to take it. You will not make the meaning of honor clear to a dishonorable man, or of love to one who is a stranger to it. By trying to bring the meaning of these words down to their understanding, you will only end by having no words left to express either honor or love.

    John Ruskin.

    Source not found yet .

    Not found yet.

    Not located; probably reached Tolstoy through Nikiforov's Russian selection (1904). The nearest thought found is in Val d'Arno §222 ('To know what love means, you must love'), which is not the source.

    Searched: All Ruskin texts on Gutenberg (as for November 26, entry 1), regex search for honour/love/word together, 'hearer', 'dishonest', 'cannot explain', 'what love means', 'words mean'.

  70. 5. Чтение и письмо отнюдь не составляют образования, если они не помогают людям быть добрее ко всем тварям.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. Reading and writing are in no sense education, unless they contribute to this end of making us feel kindly towards all creatures.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Eagle's Nest: Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science to Art · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    Reading and writing by no means make up an education if they do not help people to be kinder to all creatures.
    John Ruskin’s own words
    I have said enough, I think, to induce you to bear with me in the statement of my main theorem--that reading and writing are in no sense education, unless they contribute to this end of making us feel kindly towards all creatures; but that drawing, and especially physiologic drawing, is vital education of a most precious kind.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Eagle's Nest: Ten Lectures on the Relation of Natural Science to Art (Oxford, 1872), Lecture IX 'The Story of the Halcyon', Lecture IX, §179.

    Close: Tolstoy translates the clause Ruskin calls his 'main theorem'; 'unless they contribute to this end of making us feel kindly towards all creatures' becomes 'unless they help people to be kinder to all creatures'. The rest of Ruskin's sentence ('but that drawing, and especially physiologic drawing, is vital education') is left out. Probably through Nikiforov's Russian selection (1904). Ruskin's own clause is printed here; in Ruskin it begins mid-sentence.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  71. 5. Самый жалкий из нас обладает все-таки каким-нибудь даром, и как бы ни был этот дар, повидимому, зауряден, но, составляя нашу особенность, он может, при правильном применении, стать даром для всего человечества.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. The weakest among us has a gift, however seemingly trivial, which is peculiar to him, and which worthily used will be a gift also to his race.

    John Ruskin.

    From Modern Painters, vol. I · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    The most wretched of us still possesses some gift; and however ordinary that gift may seem, yet, since it is what is peculiarly ours, it can, rightly used, become a gift to all mankind.
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Degrees infinite of lustre there must always be, but the weakest among us has a gift, however seemingly trivial, which is peculiar to him, and which worthily used will be a gift also to his race forever--
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Modern Painters, vol. I (1843), Part II, Section I, Chapter VII 'General Application of the Foregoing Principles', Part II, Sec. I, Ch. VII, §8 'The value of inferior works of art how to be estimated'; reprinted by Ruskin in Frondes Agrestes (1875), §71.

    A close translation of Ruskin's clause; 'the weakest among us' becomes 'the most pitiful of us' (самый жалкий), 'which is peculiar to him' becomes 'being our own particularity', 'his race' becomes 'all mankind', and 'forever' is dropped. In Frondes Agrestes §71 Ruskin printed it with commas ('which, worthily used, will be a gift also to his race for ever'). Ruskin's own clause is printed here, without 'forever'; in Ruskin it begins mid-sentence.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  72. 2. Главным препятствием во всяком предстоящем полезном деле служит всегда соображение о том, что «мы не можем отказаться от нашего положения в свете».

    Для большинства людей, пользующихся этой отговоркой, сохранить то положение, в какое они поставлены жизнью или «Провидением», значит сохранить все свои экипажи, всех своих лакеев, все те обширные дома, которые они имеют возможность оплачивать. Я же думаю, что если Провидение поставило их в подобного рода положение, что довольно сомнительно, то оно же и требует от них, чтобы они оставили это положение.

    Положение Левия состояло в сборе податей; Петра — быть рыбарем на Галилейском озере; Павла — находиться в прихожей первосвященника. И все эти положения они оставили, потому что сочли это должным.

    Джон Рёскин.

    2. The chief obstacle to any useful work that lies before us is always the consideration that “we cannot give up our position in society.”

    For most of the people who use this excuse, to keep the position in which life or “Providence” has placed them means to keep all their carriages, all their footmen, all the spacious houses they are able to pay for. But I think that if Providence has placed them in a position of this sort, which is rather doubtful, then Providence also requires of them that they leave that position.

    Levi’s position consisted in collecting taxes; Peter’s, in being a fisherman on the Lake of Galilee; Paul’s, in waiting in the high priest’s antechamber. And all these positions they left, because they thought it their duty.

    John Ruskin.

    From Sesame and Lilies · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    But “_station_ in Life”—how many of us are ready to quit _that_? Is it not always the great objection, where there is question of finding something useful to do—“We cannot leave our stations in Life”?
    But with most people who use that apology, “remaining in the station of life to which Providence has called them” means keeping all the carriages, and all the footmen and large houses they can possibly pay for; and, once for all, I say that if ever Providence _did_ put them into stations of that sort—which is not at all a matter of certainty—Providence is just now very distinctly calling them out again.
    Levi’s station in life was the receipt of custom; and Peter’s, the shore of Galilee; and Paul’s, the antechambers of the High Priest,—which “station in life” each had to leave, with brief notice.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Sesame and Lilies (1894 George Allen edition), Lecture III 'The Mystery of Life and its Arts' (Dublin, 13 May 1868), Lecture III, near the end, the paragraphs on '"The work of men"—and what is that?'.

    Close, with one sentence left out: three consecutive pieces, in Ruskin's order, one per paragraph of the Russian. Ruskin's rhetorical question ('Is it not always the great objection...?') becomes a statement; the sentence on those who really cannot leave their work ('Those of us who really cannot...') is omitted; 'Providence is just now very distinctly calling them out again' becomes 'it also requires of them that they leave that position'; and 'which "station in life" each had to leave, with brief notice' becomes 'and they all left these positions, because they thought it their duty'.

  73. 8. Ложный стыд есть излюбленное орудие дьявола. Он больше достигает им, чем даже ложной гордостью. Ложной гордостью он только поощряет зло, а ложным стыдом останавливает добро.

    Джон Рёскин.

    8. False shame is the Devil’s pet weapon. He does more work with it even than with false pride. For with false pride, he only goads evil; but with false shame, paralyzes good.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter XLVI · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    _False shame is the devil’s favorite instrument. He achieves more by it than even by false pride. By false pride he only encourages evil, but by false shame he stops good._
    John Ruskin’s own words
    You are ashamed? Yes; that false shame is the Devil’s pet weapon. He does more work with it even than with false pride. For with false pride, he only goads evil; but with false shame, paralyzes good.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter XLVI (Florence, 28 August 1874), Letter XLVI, the passage on what a boy or girl can do ('Is there no garden near you...').

    Close, sentence for sentence: 'the Devil's pet weapon' becomes 'the devil's favourite weapon', 'goads evil' becomes 'encourages evil', 'paralyzes good' becomes 'stops good'. Ruskin's lead-in ('You are ashamed? Yes; that') is left out. Ruskin's own words are printed here; in Ruskin they begin mid-sentence.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  74. 1. Все народы в конце концов признают истину, давно уже постигнутую теми людьми, которые были их умственными руководителями, а именно ту, что первая добродетель человечества состоит в признании своего несовершенства и в подчинении законам высшего существа. «Прах ты и в прах возвратишься», есть первая истина, которую мы познаем относительно себя; а вторая заключается в том, чтобы возделывать землю, из которой мы взяты, что и составляет главную нашу обязанность. В этой работе и тех отношениях, которые она устанавливает между нами, животными и растениями, заключаются основные условия развития наших высших способностей и нашего величайшего благополучия. Без этой же работы немыслимы для человека ни мир, ни развитие его ума и духовных сил.

    Джон Рёскин.

    1. It will be found ultimately by all nations, as it was found long ago by those who have been leaders in human force and intellect, that the initial virtue of the race consists in the acknowledgment of their own lowly nature and submission to the laws of higher being. “Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return,” is the first truth we have to learn of ourselves; and to till the earth out of which we were taken, our first duty: in that labour, and in the relations which it establishes between us and the lower animals, are founded the conditions of our highest faculties and felicities: and without that labour, neither reason, art, nor peace, are possible to man.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LIII · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    All nations in the end acknowledge the truth long since grasped by those who were their guides in thought: namely, that the first virtue of mankind lies in acknowledging its own imperfection and in submitting to the laws of a higher being. “Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return” is the first truth we learn about ourselves; and the second is that we are to till the ground from which we were taken, and this is our chief duty. In this work, and in the relations it establishes between us, the animals and the plants, lie the fundamental conditions for the development of our higher faculties and of our greatest well-being. Without this work neither peace nor the development of his mind and spiritual powers is conceivable for man.
    John Ruskin’s own words
    And it will be found ultimately by all nations, as it was found long ago by those who have been leaders in human force and intellect, that the initial virtue of the race consists in the acknowledgment of their own lowly nature and submission to the laws of higher being. “Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return,” is the first truth we have to learn of ourselves; and to till the earth out of which we were taken, our first duty: in that labour, and in the relations which it establishes between us and the lower animals, are founded the conditions of our highest faculties and felicities: …
    … and without that labour, neither reason, art, nor peace, are possible to man.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LIII (Brantwood, Good Friday 1875), Letter LIII, after the commentary on Pope's 'Essay on Man', the paragraph beginning 'And it will be found ultimately by all nations'.

    Close, the whole paragraph, with small changes: 'their own lowly nature' becomes 'their own imperfection'; 'the lower animals' becomes 'animals and plants'; 'neither reason, art, nor peace, are possible to man' becomes 'neither peace nor the development of his mind and spiritual powers is thinkable for man' (art drops out); the opening 'And' is dropped. Ruskin's own paragraph is printed here, from 'it will be found'.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel. Genesis 3:19, in the KJV wording, which matches Tolstoy’s; “till the ground from which we were taken” echoes Genesis 3:23.

  75. 5. Беспредельная нежность есть величайший дар и достояние всех истинно великих людей.

    Джон Рёскин.

    5. An infinitude of tenderness is the chief gift and inheritance of all the truly great men.

    John Ruskin.

    From The Two Paths · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    Boundless tenderness is the greatest gift and possession of all truly great men.
    John Ruskin’s own words
    I find this more and more every day: an infinitude of tenderness is the chief gift and inheritance of all the truly great men.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Two Paths (1859), Lecture I 'The Deteriorative Power of Conventional Art over Nations' (Kensington Museum, January 1858), Lecture I, after the comparison of the Chartres statue with the Madonna of Amiens ('Tender and true').

    Close: 'an infinitude of tenderness is the chief gift and inheritance of all the truly great men' is translated word for word ('chief' becomes 'greatest'). Ruskin's own words are printed here; in Ruskin they begin mid-sentence.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  76. 7. У кого религия на втором месте, у того ее совсем нет. Бог совместим со многим в сердце человека, но несовместимо одно, чтобы он был в сердце на втором месте. Тот, кто отводит ему второстепенное место, — не отводит никакого.

    Джон Рёскин.

    7. Anything which makes religion its second object, makes religion no object. God will put up with a great many things in the human heart, but there is one thing He will not put up with in it — a second place. He who offers God a second place, offers Him no place.

    John Ruskin.

    From Lectures on Architecture and Painting, delivered at Edinburgh in November 1853, Lecture … · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    He who puts religion in second place has none at all. God is compatible with much in a man’s heart, but one thing is incompatible with him: being in second place in the heart. He who gives him a secondary place gives him none.
    John Ruskin’s own words
    Now you all know, that anything which makes religion its second object, makes religion _no_ object. God will put up with a great many things in the human heart, but there is one thing He will _not_ put up with in it--a second place. He who offers God a second place, offers Him no place.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Lectures on Architecture and Painting, delivered at Edinburgh in November 1853, Lecture IV 'Pre-Raphaelitism' (18 November 1853), Lecture IV, §120.

    Close, three sentences in order: 'anything which makes religion its second object, makes religion no object' becomes 'whoever has religion in second place has none at all'; 'God will put up with a great many things in the human heart' becomes 'God is compatible with much in a man's heart'; 'He who offers God a second place, offers Him no place' is kept exactly. In Ruskin the point is about ancient and modern art. Ruskin's own words are printed here; in Ruskin they begin mid-sentence.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  77. 4. Вся история подтверждает ту неоспоримую истину, что бога можно постичь не рассуждениями, а повиновением, что присутствие вечного порядка в мире становится очевидно лишь при подчинении этому порядку и что только этим путем мы можем на земле познать его волю.

    Джон Рёскин.

    4. All history confirms the indisputable truth that God is to be comprehended not by reasoning but by obedience; that the presence of an eternal order in the world becomes evident only when we submit to that order; and that only in this way can we on earth know his will.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter LIII · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The personal “Orderer” becomes an impersonal “eternal order.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Recast in Tolstoy’s faith ›

    John Ruskin’s own words
    Also this fact is historically certain,—that the Life of God is not to be discovered by reasoning, but by obeying; that on doing what is plainly ordered, the wisdom and presence of the Orderer become manifest; that only so His way can be known on earth, and His saving health among all nations; and that on disobedience always follows darkness, the forerunner of death.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter LIII (Brantwood, Good Friday 1875), Letter LIII, in the commentary on the eighth Psalm, after 'S'il y avait un Dieu, il faudrait le fusiller'.

    The frame and the first clause are close ('historically certain' becomes 'all history confirms the undeniable truth'; 'the Life of God is not to be discovered by reasoning, but by obeying' becomes 'God can be grasped not by reasoning but by obedience'). But Ruskin's 'on doing what is plainly ordered, the wisdom and presence of the Orderer become manifest' becomes 'the presence of an eternal order in the world becomes evident only in submission to that order': Ruskin's personal Orderer is made an impersonal order. 'His way' becomes 'His will', and 'His saving health among all nations' and the closing clause ('on disobedience always follows darkness, the forerunner of death') are left out. Same letter as 12-11.1.

  78. 8. Самые надежные и чистые радости человеческой жизни достигаются без душевных треволнений и вспоминаются без угрызений совести.

    Джон Рёскин.

    8. The surest and purest joys of human life are attained without turmoil of soul and are remembered without pangs of conscience.

    John Ruskin.

    From Fors Clavigera, Letter XCI 'Dust of Gold' · shortened by Tolstoy .
    John Ruskin’s own words
    … they may rest assured that the safest and purest joys of human life rebuke the violence of its passions ; that they are obtainable without anxiety, and memorable without regret.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Fors Clavigera, Letter XCI 'Dust of Gold' (September 1883); vol. IV of the George Allen edition, 1906, Letter XCI, the passage on girls conscious of possessing less beauty ('The real and effective sources of consolation...'), p. 397 of the 1906 volume.

    Close except for one clause: Ruskin's 'rebuke the violence of its passions' is left out; 'obtainable without anxiety' becomes 'are attained without agitation of soul' and 'memorable without regret' becomes 'are remembered without pangs of conscience'. Gutenberg has only vols 1-6 of Fors (Letters I-LXXII); this letter was found by searching the archive.org full text.