Эта страница есть и на русском сайте: открыть по-русски.

William Ellery ChanningУильям Эллери Чаннинг

30 passagesотрывков: 30

Each date opens its day beside the list, with these passages marked.Каждая дата открывает свой день рядом со списком, где отрывки этого автора отмечены.

  1. 4. Довести ребенка до сознания божественной природы в себе представляется мне главной обязанностью родителей и воспитателей.

    Чаннинг.

    4. To bring the child to a consciousness of the divinity within him seems to me the highest office which parents and teachers can perform.

    Channing.

    From Letter to Miss Emily Taylor, St. Croix, West Indies, 6 February 1831, in Memoir of Willi… · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    _To bring a child to consciousness of the divine nature within him seems to me the chief duty of parents and educators._
    Channing’s own words
    I believe in this divine principle, this ray of divine light, in the soul.
    To bring the child to a consciousness of the divinity within him seems to me the highest office which parents and teachers can perform.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Letter to Miss Emily Taylor, St. Croix, West Indies, 6 February 1831, in Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extracts from his Correspondence and Manuscripts, ed. W. H. Channing (1848), vol. II, Vol. II, Part Third, ch. II 'Religion and Philosophy', section 'Correspondence on Religion and Philosophy', p. 410 (10th edition, Boston, American Unitarian Association, 1874).

    A close translation of the sentence; 'the divinity within him' becomes 'the divine nature in himself' and 'the highest office' becomes 'the chief duty'. Tolstoy probably met it in an anthology, such as Albert Broadbent's Channing selection (London, 1903), which the Jubilee list of sources names; that book was not found online.

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  2. 2. С той минуты, когда человек отказался от своей нравственной независимости, с той минуты, когда человек стал определять свою обязанность не по внутреннему голосу, но по взглядам известного сословия или партии, с той минуты, когда он стряхнул с себя свою личную ответственность потому, что он только один из миллионов, — с этой минуты он лишился своей нравственной силы, он ожидает уже от людей того, что может совершить один бог, он ставит на место божественной силы грубые предписания человеческого ума.

    Чаннинг.

    2. From the moment that a man has given up his moral independence, from the moment that a man has begun to determine his duty not by the inner voice but by the views of a certain class or party, from the moment that he has shaken off his personal responsibility because he is only one of millions — from that moment he has lost his moral strength; he now expects from men what God alone can accomplish; he puts the crude precepts of the human mind in the place of divine power.

    Channing.

    From Slavery · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    The moment a man parts with moral independence ; the moment he judges of duty, not from the inward voice, but from the interests and will of a party ; the moment he commits himself to a leader or a body, and winks at evil because division would hurt the cause ; the moment he shakes off his particular responsibility, because he is but one of a thousand or million by whom the evil is done ; that moment he parts with his moral power.
    He is shorn of the energy of single-hearted faith in the Right and the True. He hopes from man's policy what nothing but loyalty to God can accomplish. He substitutes coarse weapons forged by man's wisdom for celestial power.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Slavery (1835), chapter VII 'Abolitionism', in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., 1884), Ch. VII, after 'This moral independence is mightier, as well as holier, than the practice of getting warm in crowds'.

    Close, with cuts and some changes. Left out: 'the moment he commits himself to a leader or a body, and winks at evil because division would hurt the cause' and the sentence 'He is shorn of the energy of single-hearted faith in the Right and the True'. 'the interests and will of a party' becomes 'the views of a certain class or party'; 'because he is but one of a thousand or million by whom the evil is done' becomes 'because he is only one of millions'; 'He hopes from man's policy what nothing but loyalty to God can accomplish' becomes 'he expects from people what God alone can accomplish'; 'He substitutes coarse weapons forged by man's wisdom for celestial power' becomes 'he puts the coarse precepts of the human mind in the place of divine power'. In Channing the passage is a criticism of the abolitionist societies' methods of agitation, which Tolstoy leaves out.

  3. 4. Есть двоякий покой. Есть покой отрицательный; это — отсутствие шума, грызущих забот, это — спокойствие после борьбы, после бурь. Но есть другой, более совершенный покой души, которому этот первый покой только предшествует, — то божественное спокойствие, которое всё понимает, истинное название которого — «царство божие внутри нас». К этому покою души принадлежит то спокойствие, которое дает нам религия. Это сознательное единение с богом и миром, союз любви со всеми существами, любовь ко всему чистому и невинному, уменье жертвовать своими желаниями и интересами, участие в духе и жизни вселенной, полное согласие своей воли с ее бесконечным источником. В этом истинное спокойствие и счастие человека.

    Чаннинг.

    4. There is a twofold peace. There is a negative peace; it is the absence of noise, of gnawing cares; it is tranquility after struggle, after storms. But there is another, more perfect peace of the soul, which this first peace only precedes — that divine tranquility which understands all things, whose true name is “the kingdom of God within us.” To this peace of the soul belongs the tranquility that religion gives us. It is a conscious union with God and the world, a bond of love with all beings, a love of all that is pure and innocent, the ability to sacrifice one’s own desires and interests, a share in the spirit and life of the universe, the complete agreement of one’s will with its infinite source. In this lies the true tranquility and happiness of man.

    Channing.

    From Remarks on the Character and Writings of Fénelon · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    There is a twofold peace. I'he first is negative. It is relief from disquiet and corroding care. It is repose after conflict and storms. But there is another and a higher peace, to which this is but the prelude, " a peace of God which passeth all understanding," and properly called " the kingdom cf heaven within us."
    Of this character is the peace of religion. It is a conscious harmony with God and the creation, an alliance of love with all beings, a sympathy with all that is pure and happy, a surrender of every separate will and interest, a participation of the spirit and life of the universe, an entire concord of purpose with its Infinite Original. This is peace, and the true happiness of man ; …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Remarks on the Character and Writings of Fénelon (Christian Examiner, 1829), in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., 1884), Late in the essay, on the word Fénelon most uses for the happiness of loving God: 'The word which Fénelon has most frequently used ... is "peace"'.

    Two stretches of one paragraph; Tolstoy leaves out the six sentences between them (the higher peace as 'the highest and most strenuous action of the soul', 'as the concord of all melodious sounds'). One clause changes in sense: 'a peace of God which passeth all understanding' becomes 'that divine calm which understands all'. Otherwise close: 'the kingdom of heaven within us' becomes 'the kingdom of God within us'; 'a sympathy with all that is pure and happy' becomes 'love for all that is pure and innocent'; 'a surrender of every separate will and interest' becomes 'the ability to sacrifice one's desires and interests'; 'an entire concord of purpose with its Infinite Original' becomes 'the full agreement of one's will with its infinite source'.

    Translation note. Two words of the Russian are kept apart: «покой», “peace”, and «спокойствие», “tranquility”. “The kingdom of God within us”: compare Luke 17:21 (KJV: “the kingdom of God is within you”).

  4. 1. Вы спрашиваете, в чем главная сущность характера Христа. Я отвечаю, что это — его уверенность в величии человеческой души. Он видел в человеке отражение и образ божества и потому любил человека, кто бы он ни был, какие бы ни были условия его жизни и характера. Иисус смотрел на людей взором, пронизывающим материальную оболочку, — тело исчезало перед ним. Он смотрел сквозь наряды богатого и лохмотья нищего в душу человека; и там, среди мрака невежества и пятен греха, он находил зачатки силы и совершенства, которые могут бесконечно развиваться, духовную, бессмертную природу. В самом низко падшем, развращенном человеке он видел существо, которое может превратиться в ангела света. Даже более того: он чувствовал, что в нем самом нет ничего такого, чего бы не мог достигнуть каждый человек.

    Чаннинг.

    1. You ask what the chief essence of Christ’s character is. I answer that it is his confidence in the greatness of the human soul. He saw in man the reflection and image of divinity, and therefore he loved man, whoever he might be, whatever the conditions of his life and character. Jesus looked on people with a gaze that pierced the material shell — the body vanished before him. He looked through the finery of the rich and the rags of the beggar into the soul of man; and there, amid the darkness of ignorance and the stains of sin, he found the seeds of strength and perfection, which can develop without end: a spiritual, immortal nature. In the most deeply fallen, depraved man he saw a being who could be transformed into an angel of light. Even more than that: he felt that there was nothing in himself that any man could not attain.

    Channing.

    From Character of Christ, a sermon on Matthew 17:5 · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    Do you ask what this deep principle was ? I answer, it was his conviction of the greatness of the human soul. He saw in man the impress and image of the divinity, and therefore thirsted for his redemption, and took the tenderest interest in him, whatever might be the rank, character, or condition in which he was found.
    Jesus looked on men with an eye which pierced beneath the material frame. The body vanished before him. The trappings of the rich, the rags of the poor, were nothing to him. He looked through them as though they did not exist, to the soul ; and there, amidst clouds of ignorance and plague-spots of sin, he recognised a spiritual and immortal nature, and the germs of power and perfection which might be unfolded for ever. In the most fallen and depraved man he saw a being who might become an angel of light. Still more, he felt there was nothing in himself to which men might not ascend.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Character of Christ, a sermon on Matthew 17:5 ('This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased'), in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., 1884), Near the end of the sermon, after 'We have not yet reached the depth of Christ's character'.

    Close, with the opening adapted and two cuts. Channing's question 'Do you ask what this deep principle was?' (the principle on which Christ's sympathy was founded) becomes 'You ask what the chief essence of Christ's character is'. 'thirsted for his redemption, and took the tenderest interest in him' becomes 'loved man'. Left out: 'This spiritual view of man pervades and distinguishes the teaching of Christ', and 'were nothing to him. He looked through them as though they did not exist' is joined into 'He looked through the finery of the rich and the rags of the poor into the soul'. 'plague-spots of sin' becomes 'stains of sin'.

  5. 3. Чем больше человек углубляется в себя, тем ничтожнее он представляется себе. В этом первый урок мудрости. Будем же смиренными, чтобы быть мудрыми. Будем знать свою слабость, и это даст нам силу.

    Чаннинг.

    3. The more deeply a man looks into himself, the more insignificant he appears to himself. In this lies the first lesson of wisdom. Let us, then, be humble, so as to be wise. Let us know our weakness, and this will give us strength.

    Channing.

    Source not found yet .

    Not found yet.

    Not found in Channing's works. Tolstoy's likely source, Albert Broadbent's selection 'Passages from his writings' (London, 1903), named in the Jubilee list of sources, is not online.

    Searched: Channing's Complete Works (1884, two printings; 1890), the Memoir (1874), Dr. Channing's Note-book (1887), Southgate, Tileston, and Coit, for 'humble' with 'wise', 'weakness' with 'strength', and 'first lesson of wisdom'; archive.org full-text search for the same phrases.

  6. 6. Если богатые и дают милостыню бедным, то они все-таки делают великий вред народу тем, что они богаты и живут роскошно. Они не думают о том, что их обожание богатства, их роскошь жизни, их презрение к бедности и серой жизни развращают бедных и внушают им ту мысль, что на свете есть только одно благо — богатство, и что надо прежде всего добиваться его.

    По Чаннингу.

    6. Even if the rich do give alms to the poor, they still do the people great harm by being rich and living in luxury. They do not consider that their worship of wealth, their luxurious living, their contempt for poverty and for a drab life corrupt the poor and instill in them the thought that there is only one good in the world — wealth — and that one must strive for it before all else.

    After Channing.

    From Discourse on the Ministry for the Poor · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The rich who “satisfy themselves with giving alms” still do harm by being rich, and the poor, taught that property is the one good “in which the poor have no share,” are taught to strive for wealth “before all else.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    After Channing’s own words
    The rich satisfy themselves with giving alms to the needy.
    They think little that their spirit and lives, their self-indulgence and earthliness, their idolatry of outward prosperity, and their contempt of inferior conditions, are …
    … perpetually teaching the destitute that there is but one good on earth, namely, property — the very good in which the poor have no share.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Discourse on the Ministry for the Poor (Boston, 1835), in The Complete Works of William Ellery Channing (London, 1884), pp. 104-105.

    Channing's 'The rich satisfy themselves with giving alms to the needy' becomes 'though the rich give alms to the poor, they still do the people great harm by being rich and living luxuriously'. His 'self-indulgence and earthliness, their idolatry of outward prosperity, and their contempt of inferior conditions' becomes 'their worship of wealth, their luxury of life, their contempt of poverty and plain life'. The ending changes in sense: Channing's poor learn that property is the one good, 'the very good in which the poor have no share', which embitters them ('to inflame, embitter, and degrade'); Tolstoy's learn that wealth must be sought before all else, which corrupts them. Broadbent's selection (1903), Tolstoy's likely source, is not online.

  7. 6. Рост есть медленный процесс, а не судорожный взрыв. Так же невозможно победить грех судорогою раскаяния, как познать целую науку мгновенным порывом мысли. Действительное средство внутреннего совершенствования — только в постоянном, терпеливом усилии, руководимом мудрым рассуждением.

    Чаннинг.

    6. Growth is a slow process, not a convulsive outburst. It is as impossible to conquer sin by a convulsion of repentance as to come to know a whole science by a momentary impulse of thought. The real means of inner perfection lies only in constant, patient effort, guided by wise reasoning.

    Channing.

    From The Imitableness of Christ's Character, a sermon on 1 Peter 2:21 · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    … growth, as you well know, is a gradual process, not a convulsive start accomplishing the work of years in a moment. All great attainments are gradual.
    As easily might a science be mastered by one struggle of thought, as sin be conquered by a spasm of remorse. Continuous patient effort, guided by wise deliberation, is the true means of spiritual progress.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Imitableness of Christ's Character, a sermon on 1 Peter 2:21 (Discourses, 1832), in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London, 1884), Toward the end of the sermon, p. 246 (the running head of that page belongs to the next sermon, 'Love to Christ').

    Channing's four sentences, shortened. 'growth … is a gradual process, not a convulsive start' is kept ('a slow process, not a convulsive explosion'); 'accomplishing the work of years in a moment' and 'All great attainments are gradual' are left out. In 'As easily might a science be mastered by one struggle of thought, as sin be conquered by a spasm of remorse' Tolstoy puts sin first, and 'remorse' becomes 'repentance' (раскаяния). 'is the true means of spiritual progress' becomes 'the real means of inner perfection is only in …' (Действительное средство внутреннего совершенствования — только в …). No printable. Broadbent's Channing selection (London, 1903), on the Jubilee list, is not online.

  8. 1. Чем дольше я живу, тем больше дела передо мной. Мы живем в важное время. Никогда людям не предстояло столько дела. Наш век есть век революции в лучшем смысле этого слова — не материальной, но нравственной революции. Вырабатывается высшая идея общественного устройства и человеческого совершенства. Мы не доживем до жатвы, но сеять с верою есть великое счастье.

    Чаннинг.

    1. The longer I live, the more work there is before me. We live in an important time. Never have people had so much work before them. Our age is an age of revolution in the best sense of the word — not a material but a moral revolution. A higher idea of social order and of human perfection is being worked out. We will not live to see the harvest, but to sow in faith is a great happiness.

    Channing.

    From Letter to Dr. Charles Follen, July 1838, in Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extr… · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “I shall not live to see the harvest” becomes “We will not live to see the harvest,” “glorious times in one respect” become “an important time,” and sowing in faith, “no mean privilege or happiness,” becomes “a great happiness.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: From one to all ›

    Channing’s own words
    … the longer I live, the more I have to do ; but other fields of labor are open to me. We live in glorious times in one respect.
    Our age is a revolutionary one, in the best sense of the word, — not of physical, but moral revolution. Higher ideas of the social state and of human perfection are at work. I shall not live to see the harvest, but to sow in faith is no mean privilege or happiness.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Letter to Dr. Charles Follen, July 1838, in Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extracts from his Correspondence and Manuscripts, ed. W. H. Channing (1848), vol. III, Vol. III, Part Third, ch. III 'Social Reforms', p. 127 (10th edition, Boston, American Unitarian Association, 1874).

    Close sentence by sentence, with changes. 'the longer I live, the more I have to do' is kept, and 'but other fields of labor are open to me' left out. 'We live in glorious times in one respect' becomes 'We live in an important time' (в важное время). 'Was there ever so much to do?' becomes 'Never have people had so much to do'. 'Higher ideas of the social state and of human perfection are at work' becomes 'A higher idea of the social order and of human perfection is being worked out'. 'I shall not live to see the harvest' becomes 'We shall not live to the harvest' (Мы не доживем до жатвы), and 'no mean privilege or happiness' becomes 'a great happiness'. The scan reads 'do }' for 'do?'. No printable. Broadbent's Channing selection (London, 1903), on the Jubilee list, is not online.

  9. 2. Прислушайтесь к тому глубокому недовольству теперешней формой христианства, которое распространяется в обществе, выражается ропотом, иногда озлоблением, печалью. Все жаждут пришествия царства бога. И оно приближается.

    Более чистое христианство, хотя и медленно, но всё более и более занимает место того, которое называется этим именем.

    Чаннинг.

    2. Listen to the deep discontent with the present form of Christianity that is spreading through society and finding expression in murmuring, sometimes in bitterness, in sadness. All thirst for the coming of the kingdom of God. And it is drawing near.

    A purer Christianity, though slowly, is more and more taking the place of the one that goes by that name.

    Channing.

    From Two works in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    Channing’s own words
    But a better day is coming. The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand. A purer Christianity, however slowly, is to take the place of that which bears but its name.
    … listen to that deep discontent with the present forms of Christianity which is spreading in the community, which breaks out in murmurs, now of scorn, now of grief, and which hungers and thirsts for a new coming of the kingdom of God.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Two works in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London, 1884): the Charge at the Ordination of the Rev. John S. Dwight (Northampton, 1840), and the sermon The Universal Father, from The Perfect Life (1873), The Charge, near its end, p. 368 (Tolstoy's first paragraph); The Universal Father, its last paragraph, p. 16 (his second).

    Joined from two works, in this order: the Charge to Dwight gives the first paragraph, and the sermon The Universal Father the second (the excerpts follow the book's order, the sermon first). 'listen to that deep discontent with the present forms of Christianity which is spreading in the community, which breaks out in murmurs, now of scorn, now of grief' is close, with 'sometimes bitterness, sadness' (иногда озлоблением, печалью) for 'now of scorn, now of grief'; 'and which hungers and thirsts for a new coming of the kingdom of God' becomes a sentence of its own, 'All thirst for the coming of the kingdom of God' (Все жаждут пришествия царства бога). 'And it is approaching' (И оно приближается) answers the sermon's 'The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand'. 'A purer Christianity, however slowly, is to take the place of that which bears but its name' becomes 'A purer Christianity, though slowly, more and more takes the place of that which is called by this name', set in italics. Whether the joining is Broadbent's (Channing selection, London, 1903, not online) or Tolstoy's cannot be told. No printable.

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at the commas; it is set here as one span.

  10. 6. Обыкновенно делают различие между разумом и совестью, говоря, что добрые дела важнее сильного мышления. Но таким разделением неразрывно соединенных сил души мы калечим нашу природу. Отнимите мысль от добродетели, что останется? Без силы мысли то, что мы называем совестью, вырождается в мечтания, преувеличение, оправдание зла. Самые жестокие дела на свете были совершены во имя совести. Люди ненавидели, убивали друг друга по долгу совести.

    Чаннинг.

    6. It is usual to make a distinction between reason and conscience, saying that good deeds are more important than powerful thinking. But by such a division of the inseparably united powers of the soul we cripple our nature. Take thought away from virtue, and what will remain? Without the power of thought, what we call conscience degenerates into fancies, exaggeration, the justification of evil. The cruelest deeds in the world have been done in the name of conscience. People have hated and killed one another as a duty of conscience.

    Channing.

    From On the Elevation of the Laboring Classes · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “What we call conscientiousness, or a desire to do right” becomes “what we call conscience,” its “pernicious excess” becomes “the justification of evil,” and hatred “from a sense of duty” becomes hatred “as a duty of conscience.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    Channing’s own words
    It is common to distinguish between the intellect and the conscience, between the power of thought and virtue, and to say that virtuous action is worth more than strong thinking. But we mutilate our nature by thus drawing lines between actions or energies of the soul, which are intimately, indissolubly bound together.
    Take away thought from virtue, and what remains worthy of a man ?
    Without power of thought, what we call conscientiousness, or a desire to do right, shoots out into illusion, exaggeration, pernicious excess. The most cruel deeds on earth have been perpetrated in the name of conscience. Men have hated and murdered one another from a sense of duty.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. On the Elevation of the Laboring Classes (lectures, Boston, 1840), in The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890), Pp. 43–44, in the account of the first element of elevation, 'Force of Thought exerted for the acquisition of truth'.

    Shortened, and changed at one word that counts. 'the intellect and the conscience, between the power of thought and virtue' becomes 'reason and conscience'; 'virtuous action is worth more than strong thinking' becomes 'good deeds are more important than strong thinking'. Six sentences in the middle (the head and the heart, conscience as 'a wise discernment of the right', virtue as more than blind instinct) are left out. 'what remains worthy of a man?' becomes 'what will remain?'. 'what we call conscientiousness, or a desire to do right' becomes 'what we call conscience', and 'shoots out into illusion, exaggeration, pernicious excess' becomes 'degenerates into fancies, exaggeration, the justification of evil' (оправдание зла). 'from a sense of duty' becomes 'from the duty of conscience' (по долгу совести). The 1884 London scans read 'c>n earth' and 'e.xaggeration' here; the Boston printing of 1890 is cited. No printable. Broadbent's Channing selection (London, 1903), on the Jubilee list, is not online.

  11. 2. Истинная любовь к богу есть нравственное чувство, основанное на ясном понимании высшего совершенства. Так что любовь к богу совпадает вполне с любовью к добродетели, справедливости, доброте.

    Чаннинг.

    2. True love for God is a moral feeling founded on a clear understanding of the highest perfection. So love for God coincides completely with love for virtue, justice, goodness.

    Channing.

    From Unitarian Christianity: Discourse at the Ordination of the Rev. Jared Sparks, Baltimore,… · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    We conceive that the true love of God is a moral sentiment, founded on a clear perception, and consisting in a high esteem and veneration of his moral perfections. Thus, it perfectly coincides, and is, in fact, the same thing, with the love of virtue, rectitude, and goodness.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Unitarian Christianity: Discourse at the Ordination of the Rev. Jared Sparks, Baltimore, 1819, The paragraph on the love of God, after 'We cannot sacrifice our reason to the reputation of zeal'; The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890).

    Shortened. 'Founded on a clear perception, and consisting in a high esteem and veneration of his moral perfections' becomes 'founded on a clear understanding of the highest perfection': Channing's esteem and veneration are left out, and God's 'moral perfections' become 'the highest perfection'. 'It perfectly coincides, and is, in fact, the same thing, with' becomes 'coincides wholly with', and 'rectitude' becomes 'justice' (справедливости). No printable, for the cuts.

  12. 2. Достоинство человека — в том духовном начале, которое называется иногда разумом, иногда совестью. Начало это, поднимаясь выше местного и временного, содержит несомненную истину и вечную правду. В среде несовершенного оно видит совершенство. Оно всеобще, беспристрастно и всегда в противоречии со всем тем, что пристрастно и себялюбиво в человеческой природе. Это начало властно говорит каждому из нас, что ближний наш столь же драгоценен, как и мы, и что его права столь же священны, как и наши. Оно велит нам воспринимать истину, как бы она ни противна была нашей гордости, и быть справедливым, как бы это ни было невыгодно нам. Оно же, это начало, призывает нас к тому, что прекрасно, свято и счастливо, в ком бы мы ни встретили эти свойства. Начало это есть луч божества в человеке.

    Чаннинг.

    2. The dignity of man lies in that spiritual principle which is called sometimes reason, sometimes conscience. This principle, rising above the local and the temporary, holds undoubted truth and eternal right. In the midst of the imperfect it sees perfection. It is universal, impartial, and always at odds with all that is partial and selfish in human nature. This principle tells each of us with authority that our neighbor is as precious as we are, and that his rights are as sacred as ours. It bids us receive the truth, however repugnant it may be to our pride, and be just, however much it may be to our disadvantage. It is this same principle that calls us to whatever is beautiful, holy, and happy, in whomever we may meet these qualities. This principle is a ray of divinity in man.

    Channing.

    From On the Elevation of the Laboring Classes · close to the original .
    Channing’s own words
    Am I asked for my conception of the dignity of a human being ? I should say, that it consists, first, in that spiritual principle, called sometimes the reason, sometimes the conscience, …
    … which says to me with authority, that my neighbor is as precious as myself, and his rights as sacred as my own …
    … and which calls me to rejoice with love in all that is beautiful, good, holy, happy, in whatever being these attributes may be found. This principle is a ray of Divinity in man.
    Source text: archive.org
    The Complete Works of William Ellery Channing
    This principle is a rare Divinity in man.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. On the Elevation of the Laboring Classes (lectures to the Mechanic Apprentices' Library Association, Boston, 1840), The passage beginning 'Am I asked for my conception of the dignity of a human being?'; The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890).

    A close translation of Channing's one long sentence, broken into seven, with his last sentence kept: 'This principle is a ray of Divinity in man' (Начало это есть луч божества в человеке). Channing speaks in the first person ('says to me', 'my neighbor', 'commands me'); Tolstoy makes it 'each of us', 'our neighbor', 'commands us'. He leaves out 'first' (Channing's first of two views of man), turns 'calls me to rejoice with love in all that is beautiful, good, holy, happy' into 'calls us to what is beautiful, holy and happy', so that 'rejoice with love' and 'good' are gone, and 'discerns immutable truth and everlasting right' becomes 'contains undoubted truth and eternal right'. The London printing of 1884 reads 'a rare Divinity' (Another printing), an error the Boston edition of 1890 does not have. No printable, for the changed person and the words left out.

  13. 5. Я назову только ту душу свободной, которая действует по внутренним мотивам неизменных начал, свободно воспринятых ею. Я назову свободной только ту душу, которая не подчиняется рабству обычая, которая не довольствуется старыми, приобретенными добродетелями, которая не замыкается в определенные правила, которая забывает то, что позади, а прислушивается к призывам совести и радуется тому, что может стремиться к новым и высшим задачам.

    Чаннинг.

    5. I will call that soul alone free which acts from the inner motives of unchanging principles that it has freely taken up. I will call that soul alone free which does not submit to the slavery of custom, which is not content with old, acquired virtues, which does not shut itself up within fixed rules, which forgets what is behind and listens to the calls of conscience, and rejoices that it can strive toward new and higher tasks.

    Channing.

    From Spiritual Freedom: Discourse preached at the Annual Election, 26 May 1830 · shortened by Tolstoy .
    What Tolstoy read · The Message of Man: A Book of Ethical Scriptures, gathered by Stanton Coit
    … inward spring, from immutable principles, which it has deliberately espoused.
    … which does not enslave itself to precise rules …
    Source text: archive.org
    Channing’s own words
    I call that mind free which is not passively framed by outward circumstances, which is not swept away by the torrent of events, which is not the creature of accidental impulse, but which bends events to its own improvement, and acts from an inward spring, from immutable principles which it has deliberately espoused.
    I call that mind free which resists the bondage of habit, which does not mechanically repeat itself and copy the past, which does not live on its old virtues, which does not enslave itself to precise rules, but which forgets what is behind, listens for new and higher monitions of conscience, and rejoices to pour itself forth in fresh and higher exertions.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Spiritual Freedom: Discourse preached at the Annual Election, 26 May 1830, The series of sentences beginning 'I call that mind free'; The Complete Works of William Ellery Channing (London, 1884).

    Two of Channing's sentences, each shortened in the way Coit's The Message of Man (1902) shortens them as its verses 26 and 27 (What Tolstoy read): the first keeps only 'acts from an inward spring, from immutable principles which it has deliberately espoused', the second leaves out 'which does not mechanically repeat itself and copy the past'. Tolstoy follows Coit and changes words: 'I call that mind free' becomes 'I shall call free only that soul', twice, with 'only' added; 'deliberately espoused' becomes 'freely accepted'; 'its old virtues' becomes 'old, acquired virtues'; 'listens for new and higher monitions of conscience, and rejoices to pour itself forth in fresh and higher exertions' becomes 'listens to the calls of conscience and rejoices that it can strive toward new and higher tasks'. No printable, for the changes. Coit's verses are cited here from the clean parts of a damaged scan.

    Translation note. “Forgets what is behind” echoes Paul’s “forgetting those things which are behind” (Philippians 3:13).

  14. 3. Связи семьи и отечества не могут и не должны ограничивать душу. Человек со дня рождения окружен малым числом людей с тем, чтобы нежность этих людей вызывала в нем чувство любви к человеку. Но когда привязанности семейные и народные становятся исключительными и благодаря этому исключают всеобщие требования человеческого рода, тогда вместо того, чтобы быть воспитательницами сердца, они становятся его могилой.

    Чаннинг.

    3. The ties of family and of country cannot and must not confine the soul. From the day of his birth man is surrounded by a small number of people, so that their tenderness may awaken in him the feeling of love for man. But when family and national attachments become exclusive and so exclude the universal claims of the human race, then, instead of being the educators of the heart, they become its grave.

    Channing.

    From A manuscript of 1825 on universal love, in Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extra… · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    … were never intended to circumscribe the soul.
    … and whenever domestic or national attachments become exclusive, engrossing, clannish, so as to shut out the general claims of the human race, the highest end of Providence is frustrated, and home, instead of being the nursery, becomes the grave of the heart.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. A manuscript of 1825 on universal love, in Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extracts from his Correspondence and Manuscripts, ed. W. H. Channing (1848), vol. III, Vol. III, Part Third, ch. III 'Social Reforms', 'Spirit of Reform', pp. 6–7 (10th edition, Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1874).

    Shortened, its order kept. Channing's 'the ties of family and of country were never intended to circumscribe the soul' becomes 'cannot and must not limit the soul'; 'Man is connected at birth with a few beings, that the spirit of humanity may be called forth by their tenderness' becomes 'that the tenderness of these people may call forth in him the feeling of love for man'. In the last sentence Tolstoy leaves out 'engrossing, clannish' and 'the highest end of Providence is frustrated', and makes the attachments themselves, rather than 'home', the nursery that becomes 'the grave of the heart'; 'nursery' is 'educators' (воспитательницами). The middle sentence breaks across the scan's running head ('UNIVERSAL LOVE. 7') and is not quoted. The Memoir dates the extract 1825; it was not found in Channing's Works. No printable, for the cuts.

  15. 6. Истинная мудрость учит нас тому, что основы мыслей всякого человека живут в его более скромных братьях и что те свойства, которые выказывает ученый в своих глубочайших открытиях, совершенно те же самые, как и те, которые обыкновенный человек употребляет в своих ежедневных жизненных трудах.

    Истинное понимание великих людей состоит в том, что они только примеры и проявления нашей общей природы, показывающие то, что свойственно всем душам, хотя оно и раскрывается еще лишь в немногих. Свет, исходящий от них, есть не что иное, как слабое откровение той силы, которая таится в каждом человеческом существе. Они не диво, не чудо, но естественное развитие человеческой души.

    Из «Передовой мысли мира».

    6. True wisdom teaches us that the foundations of every man’s thoughts live in his humbler brothers, and that the qualities a scholar displays in his deepest discoveries are exactly the same as those an ordinary man uses in his daily labors of life.

    The true understanding of great men lies in this: that they are only examples and manifestations of our common nature, showing what is proper to all souls, though as yet it has unfolded in only a few. The light that comes from them is nothing other than a faint revelation of the power that lies hidden in every human being. They are not a marvel, not a miracle, but the natural development of the human soul.

    From “World’s Advance Thought” [Channing].

    From Honor Due to All Men · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The thoughts of “the man of genius,” whose elements exist in “his humbler brethren,” become the thoughts of “every man,” so the contrast of genius with common men is lost; “A true philosophy of the mind,” the journal’s words, becomes “True wisdom.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: From one to all ›

    What Tolstoy read · The World's Advance-Thought and the Universal Republic
    A true philosophy of the mind is beneficial because "it teaches us that the elements of the greatest thoughts of the man of genius exist in his humbler brethren; …
    The true view of great men is, that they are only examples and manifestations of our common nature, showing what belongs to all souls, though unfolded yet in only a few.
    They are not prodigies-- not miracles; but natural developments of the human soul.
    Source text: iapsop.com
    From “World’s Advance Thought”’s own words
    The true view of great men is, that they are only examples and manifestations of our common nature, showing what belongs to all souls, though unfolded as yet only in a few. The light which shines from them is, after all, but a faint revelation of the power which is treasured up in every human being. They are not prodigies, not miracles, but natural developments of the human soul.
    … of the man of genius exist in his humbler brethren, and that the faculties which the scientific exert in the profoundest discoveries are precisely the same with those which common men employ in the daily labors of life.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Honor Due to All Men (sermon on 1 Peter 2:17), Two passages about a page apart, the later one first; The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890), pp. 68–69.

    Channing's words, which Mallory's journal printed in its September 1904 number as an unsigned paragraph: 'A true philosophy of the mind is beneficial because "it teaches us that ..."', with Channing's two passages joined by asterisks and set in the reverse of the sermon's order (What Tolstoy read). Tolstoy follows the journal's order. The Jubilee editors supplied the signature: the printed editions of the Circle have none (vol. 42, the list of corrected signatures, «1 июля, 6»: «Подписи нет», corrected to «Из «Передовой мысли мира»»). July 1's other journal entry (7-1.7) is in the same number, p. 122. Changed in one place: 'the elements of the greatest thoughts of the man of genius exist in his humbler brethren' becomes 'the foundations of the thoughts of every man live in his humbler brothers' (основы мыслей всякого человека живут в его более скромных братьях): Channing's 'man of genius' becomes 'every man' and 'greatest' is gone, so the contrast of genius with common men is lost from the first clause. 'A true philosophy of the mind' (the journal's paraphrase of Channing's 'the philosophy of mind') becomes 'True wisdom' (Истинная мудрость). The rest is close: 'the faculties which the scientific exert in the profoundest discoveries' are 'the qualities which the scholar shows in his deepest discoveries'; 'The light which shines from them is, after all, but a faint revelation of the power which is treasured up in every human being'; 'They are not prodigies, not miracles, but natural developments of the human soul' (Они не диво, не чудо, но естественное развитие человеческой души). The attribution is correct as to the route; the author is Channing. No printable, for the change in the first sentence.

  16. 2. Без внутренней свободы внешняя свобода ничего не стоит. Какая мне польза, если я не подавлен внешним насилием, но вследствие незнания, порока, эгоизма, страха я не управляю своей душой. Я назову только того человека свободным, который не замкнут в себе или своей секте, который побеждает гордость, гнев, леность и готов отдать себя в жертву за благо человечества.

    Чаннинг.

    2. Without inner freedom, outward freedom is worth nothing. What good is it to me if I am not crushed by outward violence, but through ignorance, vice, egoism, and fear do not govern my own soul? I will call only that man free who is not shut up in himself or his sect, who overcomes pride, anger, and sloth, and is ready to sacrifice himself for the good of humanity.

    Channing.

    From Spiritual Freedom: Discourse preached at the Annual Election, 26 May 1830 · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    What Tolstoy read · The Message of Man: A Book of Ethical Scriptures, gathered by Stanton Coit
    … outward liberty is of little worth.
    … which conquers pride, anger, and sloth, and offers itself up a willing victim to the cause of mankind.
    Source text: archive.org
    Channing’s own words
    I call that mind free which sets no bounds to its love, which is not imprisoned in itself or in a sect, which recognizes in all human beings the image of God and the rights of his children, which delights in virtue and sympathizes with suffering wherever they are seen, which conquers pride, anger, and sloth, and offers itself up a wilHng victim to the cause of mankind.
    Without this inward spiritual freedom outward liberty is of little worth. What boots it that I am crushed by no foreign yoke if, through ignorance and vice, through selfishness and fear, I want the command of my own mind ?
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Spiritual Freedom: Discourse preached at the Annual Election, 26 May 1830, The series of sentences beginning 'I call that mind free' (p. 174), then the paragraph on tyranny (p. 176); The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890).

    Two places in Channing's sermon, in the order and the cut form of Coit's The Message of Man (1902), verses 18 and 21 of its chapter on freedom (What Tolstoy read): Coit puts the later sentence first and leaves out of the 'I call that mind free' sentence the clause 'which recognizes in all human beings the image of God and the rights of his children'. Tolstoy changes words in both. 'Without this inward spiritual freedom outward liberty is of little worth' becomes 'Without inner freedom outer freedom is worth nothing' (ничего не стоит); 'What boots it that I am crushed by no foreign yoke if, through ignorance and vice, through selfishness and fear, I want the command of my own mind?' becomes 'What good is it to me if I am not crushed by outward violence, but through ignorance, vice, selfishness, fear I do not govern my soul?' (the foreign yoke becomes outward violence). 'I call that mind free' becomes 'I shall call free only that man' (only is added; mind becomes man); 'which sets no bounds to its love' and 'which delights in virtue and sympathizes with suffering wherever they are seen' are left out; 'offers itself up a willing victim to the cause of mankind' becomes 'is ready to give itself in sacrifice for the good of mankind'. The scan of the 1890 Works reads 'wilHng'. Coit's verse 19 ('The worst tyrants are those which establish themselves in our own breasts'), which follows verse 18 in the sermon too, is not used. June's 6-23.5 came from later verses of the same chapter. No printable, for the joining and the changes.

  17. 2. В душе нашей лежит зародыш истины бессмертия. Он лежит в разуме, который видит неполноту нашего существования в этом мире, требующую продолжения для достижения своей цели. Зародыш этот — в нашей жажде счастья, столь сильной, что она никогда не может быть удовлетворена в этом мире. Зародыш этот — в любви к добру, которая по мере того, как мы воспитываем ее, пробуждает в нас стремление к полному совершенству и единению с Совершенным.

    Чаннинг.

    2. In our soul lies the seed of the truth of immortality. It lies in reason, which sees the incompleteness of our existence in this world, an incompleteness that requires continuation for its goal to be reached. This seed is in our thirst for happiness, so strong that it can never be satisfied in this world. This seed is in the love of good, which, in the measure that we cultivate it, awakens in us a striving toward complete perfection and union with the Perfect.

    Channing.

    From The Perfect Life · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    The germ of this great truth is in our nature; in the conscience, that includes as one of its elements a presentiment of retribution; in the reason, that beholds in the present an incomplete destiny, needing to be continued for the fulfilment of its end : in the thirst for happiness, that is too deep to be satisfied on earth, but opens into aspiration towards an infinitelv blessed Being; in the love of moral goodness and beauty, which in proportion as it is cultivated awakens the ideal of spotless virtue and a desire of community with the All-Perfect One.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Perfect Life (1873), II, God Revealed in the Universe and in Humanity, On Jesus' doctrine of immortality; The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890), p. 939.

    One sentence of Channing's, made four, its first clause cut. 'The germ of this great truth is in our nature' becomes 'In our soul lies the germ of the truth of immortality'; the clause on the conscience, 'that includes as one of its elements a presentiment of retribution', is left out; 'in the reason, that beholds in the present an incomplete destiny, needing to be continued for the fulfilment of its end' is close; 'in the thirst for happiness, that is too deep to be satisfied on earth' is kept and 'but opens into aspiration towards an infinitely blessed Being' left out; 'in the love of moral goodness and beauty' becomes 'in the love of the good' (moral and beauty gone), and 'which in proportion as it is cultivated awakens the ideal of spotless virtue and a desire of community with the All-Perfect One' becomes 'which, as we cultivate it, awakens in us a striving for complete perfection and union with the Perfect'. Tolstoy repeats 'This germ is' (Зародыш этот) at the head of each clause. The scan reads 'infinitelv'. No printable, for the cuts.

  18. 3. Истинное величие человеческой жизни почти всегда совершенно невидимо. Очень может быть, что перед нами молчаливо и тайно совершается величайший подвиг, великодушнейшая жертва, зарождается возвышеннейший замысел, а мы и не подозреваем этого. Я верю, что такое величие очень обыкновенно среди многих людей, имен которых мы не слышим и не знаем. Я уверен, что среди так называемого простого народа чаще встречаются мужественно перенесенные страдания, чаще встречаются неприкрашенная правда, твердая вера и то истинное великодушие, которое отдает то, что необходимо дающему, и, главное, чаще, чем между богатыми, встречается верное понимание смысла жизни и смерти.

    По Чаннингу.

    3. The true greatness of human life is almost always wholly invisible. It may very well be that before our eyes, silently and secretly, the greatest of great deeds is being done, the most magnanimous sacrifice made, the loftiest design conceived, and we do not even suspect it. I believe that such greatness is very common among many people whose names we do not hear and do not know. I am sure that among the so-called simple people one more often meets with sufferings bravely borne, more often with unvarnished truth, firm faith, and that true magnanimity which gives away what the giver himself needs; and, above all, more often than among the rich, one meets with a true understanding of the meaning of life and death.

    After Channing.

    From Self-Culture: Address introductory to the Franklin Lectures, Boston, September 1838 · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The more prosperous” become “the rich,” “religious trust” becomes “firm faith,” and “a wise estimate of life and death,” set “above all” the rest, becomes “a true understanding of the meaning of life and death”; greatness “most common among the multitude” becomes “very common among many people.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    After Channing’s own words
    … so that the true greatness of human life is almost wholly out of sight.
    Perhaps in our presence, the most heroic deed on earth is done in some silent spirit, the loftiest purpose cherished, the most generous sacrifice made, and we do not suspect it.
    I believe this greatness to be most common among the multitude, whose names are never heard.
    Among common people will be found more of hardship borne manfully, more of unvarnished truth, more of religious trust, more of that generosity which gives what the giver needs himself, and more of a wise estimate of life and death, than among the more prosperous.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Self-Culture: Address introductory to the Franklin Lectures, Boston, September 1838, The paragraph on moral greatness, after 'The greatest man is he who chooses the right with invincible resolution'; The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890), pp. 13–14.

    Signed 'After Channing': the end of Channing's paragraph, kept in its order, with changes. Left out: the list before it of what is unseen ('The solemn conflicts of reason with passion' and the rest). 'the true greatness of human life is almost wholly out of sight' becomes 'is almost always wholly invisible' (always is added). 'Perhaps in our presence, the most heroic deed on earth is done in some silent spirit, the loftiest purpose cherished, the most generous sacrifice made, and we do not suspect it' is close. 'I believe this greatness to be most common among the multitude, whose names are never heard' becomes 'I believe that such greatness is very common among many people whose names we do not hear and do not know' (most becomes very). 'Among common people will be found more of hardship borne manfully, more of unvarnished truth, more of religious trust, more of that generosity which gives what the giver needs himself, and more of a wise estimate of life and death, than among the more prosperous' becomes 'I am sure that among the so-called simple people one meets more often sufferings courageously borne, ... unadorned truth, firm faith, and that true generosity which gives what the giver needs, and, above all, more often than among the rich, a true understanding of the meaning of life and death': 'I am sure', 'so-called', and 'above all' (главное) are added, 'religious trust' becomes 'firm faith' (твердая вера), 'a wise estimate of life and death' becomes 'a true understanding of the meaning of life and death', and 'the more prosperous' becomes 'the rich'. No printable.

    Translation note. «Простой народ», usually “the common people,” is given as “the simple people” to keep the day’s word «простой», “simple.”

  19. 2. Разум, становясь слугой порока, орудием страстей, защитником лжи, не только извращается, но делается больным, теряя способность различения правды и лжи, добра и зла, праведного и неправедного.

    Чаннинг.

    2. Reason, when it becomes the servant of vice, the instrument of the passions, the defender of falsehood, is not only perverted but becomes diseased, losing the power to distinguish truth from falsehood, good from evil, the righteous from the unrighteous.

    Channing.

    From On the Elevation of the Laboring Classes · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · The Message of Man: A Book of Ethical Scriptures, gathered by Stanton Coit
    … a pander to vice, a tool of the passions, an advocate of lies, becomes not only degraded but diseased. It loses the capacity of distinguishing truth from falsehood, good from evil, right from wrong.
    Source text: archive.org
    Channing’s own words
    The intellect, in becoming a pander to vice, a tool of the passions, an advocate of lies, becomes not only degraded, but diseased. It loses the capacity of distinguishing truth from falsehood, good from evil, right from wrong …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. On the Elevation of the Laboring Classes (lectures to the Mechanic Apprentices' Library Association, Boston, 1840), The paragraph on the love of truth as the motive of intellectual force; The Works of William E. Channing (Boston: American Unitarian Association, 1890), p. 45.

    A close translation of Channing's two sentences, made one: 'It loses the capacity' becomes the participle 'losing the capacity' (теряя способность). 'a pander to vice' becomes 'a servant of vice' (слугой порока); 'becomes not only degraded, but diseased' becomes 'is not only perverted but becomes diseased'; 'right from wrong' becomes 'the righteous and the unrighteous'. The two sentences are verse 9 of a chapter of Coit's The Message of Man (1902), word for word (What Tolstoy read), in the chapter from which May took Martineau's 5-21.5. Faithful to the English: printable offered; the reviewer may prefer Tolstoy's version, since 'pander' is softened to 'servant' and 'degraded' rendered 'perverted'.

  20. 2. Не бойся человека, высокого или низкого, богатого или бедного, ученого или неученого. Уважай всех людей, люби всех людей, но не бойся никого. Следуй той истине, которую открывает тебе твой разум, и держись своих убеждений во что бы то ни стало. Не дожидайся отзвука в толпе. Чем меньше голосов на стороне истины, тем сильнее возвышай голос. Верь в то, что истина могущественней заблуждения, предрассудка или страсти, и будь готов на мученичество. Познай, что истина не есть местное и временное явление, но нечто неизменное, вечное, одно и то же во всех мирах, единое с богом и имеющее его всемогущество.

    Чаннинг.

    2. Do not fear man, high or low, rich or poor, learned or unlearned. Respect all people, love all people, but fear no one. Follow the truth that your reason reveals to you, and hold to your convictions at all costs. Do not wait for an echo in the crowd. The fewer the voices on the side of truth, the more strongly raise your voice. Believe that truth is mightier than error, prejudice, or passion, and be ready for martyrdom. Know that truth is not a local and temporary phenomenon, but something unchanging, eternal, one and the same in all worlds, one with God and possessing his omnipotence.

    Channing.

    From Charge at the Ordination of the Rev. John Sullivan Dwight, as Pastor of the Second Congr… · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    Fear no man, high or low, rich or poor, taught or untaught. Honour all men ; love all men ; but fear none.
    But having deliberately, conscientiously sought the truth, abide by your convictions at all hazards.
    Wait not till you are sure of an echo from a crowd. The fewer the voices on the side of truth, the more distinct and strong must be your own.
    Put faith in truth as mightier than error, prejudice, or passion, and be ready to take a place among its martyrs. Feel that truth is not a local, temporary influence, but immutable, everlasting, the same in all worlds, one with God, and armed with his omnipotence.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Charge at the Ordination of the Rev. John Sullivan Dwight, as Pastor of the Second Congregational Church in Northampton (1840), The Complete Works of William Ellery Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., Routledge, 1884), pp. 366–367: 'I now say, preach with moral courage'.

    Shortened from one paragraph, which Channing addressed to a young minister at his ordination ('preach with moral courage'); Tolstoy's version speaks to everyone. Tolstoy keeps the opening two sentences ('Honour all men' becomes 'Respect all men', Уважай всех людей) and leaves out the next eight, from 'Speak what you account great truths frankly' to 'with the name of Christian doctrine'. 'But having deliberately, conscientiously sought the truth, abide by your convictions at all hazards' becomes 'Follow the truth which your reason reveals to you, and hold to your convictions whatever it costs' (Следуй той истине, которую открывает тебе твой разум). 'Never shrink from speaking your mind through dread of reproach. Wait not to be backed by numbers.' is left out; 'the more distinct and strong must be your own' becomes 'the more strongly raise your voice' (тем сильнее возвышай голос); 'be ready to take a place among its martyrs' becomes 'be ready for martyrdom'; 'Feel that truth' becomes 'Know that truth' (Познай); 'armed with his omnipotence' becomes 'having his omnipotence'. Coit's The Message of Man prints only the two sentences 'Wait not to be backed by numbers. Wait not till you are sure of an echo from a crowd' and the next, so it was not Tolstoy's source here; the Jubilee list of the Circle's sources names Albert Broadbent's selection of Channing (London, 1903), not found online.

  21. 1. Все души принадлежат к одной и той же семье, все одного происхождения, одной природы, все оживотворены одним и тем же светом и все стремятся к одному и тому же центру, одному и тому же благу. Эта величайшая для нас истина, лежащая в основе всякой религии, не только доказывается разумом, но мне представляется несомненным свойством нашей природы.

    Чаннинг.

    1. All souls belong to one and the same family, all are of one origin, of one nature, all are given life by one and the same light, and all strive toward one and the same center, one and the same good. This truth, the greatest of all for us, which lies at the foundation of every religion, is not only proved by reason, but seems to me an unquestionable property of our nature.

    Channing.

    From The Imitableness of Christ's Character · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    Channing’s own words
    All minds are of one family.
    All minds are essentially of one origin, one nature, kindled from one divine flame, and are all tending to one centre, one happiness.
    This great truth, to us the greatest of truths, which lies at the foundation of all religion and of all hope, seems to me not only sustained by proofs which satisfy the reason, but to be one of the deep instincts of our nature.
    Source text: archive.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Все души принадлежат к одной и той же семье, все одного происхождения, одной природы, все оживотворены одним и тем же светом и все стремятся к одному и тому же центру, одному и тому же благу.
    Это великая истина, величайшая для нас истина, лежащая во всех религиях.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Imitableness of Christ's Character (discourse, 1832), The Complete Works of William Ellery Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., Routledge, 1884), p. 244: 'I regard all minds as of one family'.

    Joined from two sentences a few lines apart, and changed in its words. Channing's 'All minds are of one family' and 'All minds are essentially of one origin, one nature, kindled from one divine flame, and are all tending to one centre, one happiness' become one sentence, 'All souls belong to one and the same family, all of one origin, one nature, all animated by one and the same light, and all strive toward one and the same centre, one and the same good': 'minds' becomes 'souls' (души), 'kindled from one divine flame' 'animated by one and the same light' (оживотворены одним и тем же светом), 'one happiness' 'one and the same good' (благу). In the second sentence 'and of all hope' is left out, 'sustained by proofs which satisfy the reason' becomes 'proved by reason', and 'one of the deep instincts of our nature' becomes 'an undoubted property of our nature' (несомненным свойством нашей природы). Between the two Channing sentences stands his contrast of the material world, where mineral, plant, insect, and lion are divided by 'impassable barriers', with the spiritual world, which has none. Tolstoy printed the thought again in На каждый день (March 3), its second sentence freer still: 'a great truth, the greatest truth for us, lying in all religions; it is proved not only by reason, but every man feels it without proof'.

  22. 5. Одна великая мысль завладела моей душой. Мысль эта есть сознание величия моей души, ее единения с богом не вследствие слепого подчинения ему, но вследствие ее способности воспринимать его, вследствие ее способности совершенствования, вследствие ее предназначения к невыразимому величию, вследствие ее бессмертия.

    Амиель.

    5. One great thought has taken possession of my soul. This thought is the consciousness of the greatness of my soul, of its union with God, not through blind submission to him, but through its capacity to receive him, through its capacity for perfection, through its being destined for inexpressible greatness, through its immortality.

    Amiel [Channing].

    From Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extracts from his Correspondence and Manuscripts · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The greatness of the soul” becomes “the consciousness of the greatness of my soul,” and “its divinity” is left out; “passive dependence” becomes “blind submission,” and the soul’s powers, which Channing lists beside its union with God, become the reasons for it: “through its capacity to receive him, through its capacity for perfection.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    Amiel’s own words
    In my own labors there has been more unity, perhaps in consequence of the strong hold which one sublime idea has taken of my mind.
    This is, the greatness of the soul, its divinity, its union with God, …
    … its destination to ineffable glory, its immortality …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Memoir of William Ellery Channing, with Extracts from his Correspondence and Manuscripts (1848), Vol. II, part III, ch. II «Religion and Philosophy», the extract dated «Boston, April 4th, 1837» (10th ed., Boston 1874, p. 424).

    Channing's words, signed «Амиель» in the Circle. In an extract of 4 April 1837 printed in his Memoir, Channing writes that his preaching had more unity than other Liberal Christians' 'perhaps in consequence of the strong hold which one sublime idea has taken of my mind. This is, the greatness of the soul, its divinity, its union with God,—not by passive dependence, but by spiritual likeness,—its receptiveness of his spirit, its self-forming power, its destination to ineffable glory, its immortality.' (The scan misreads 'spiritual' and 'power', so the excerpts leave those words out.) The Russian follows Channing's list item by item, with changes: 'one sublime idea' becomes «Одна великая мысль» (one great thought); 'the greatness of the soul' becomes «сознание величия моей души» (the consciousness of the greatness of my soul); 'its divinity' and 'by spiritual likeness' are left out; 'passive dependence' becomes «слепого подчинения» (blind submission); 'receptiveness of his spirit' becomes «способности воспринимать его» (capacity to receive him); 'self-forming power' becomes «способности совершенствования» (capacity for perfection); 'ineffable glory' becomes «невыразимому величию» (inexpressible greatness); and the soul's qualities, which Channing sets side by side, become the reasons for its union with God («вследствие…», in consequence of…). How Amiel's name came to the thought is not known: it is in neither French edition of the Fragments saved (1887, 1897) nor in Ward's English, and the Jubilee commentary and name index (vol. 42) say nothing of it. Channing is quoted elsewhere in the Circle under his own name. The Circle's English site would print the author's words only where Tolstoy kept them closely; here he did not, so no printable text is given.

  23. 5. Могущественные силы работают в мире. Никто не может остановить их. Признаки этого: новое понимание христианства, уважение к человеку, новое чувство братства и одинакового отношения всех людей к отцу всех. Мы видим это, мы чувствуем это. И перед этим падут все угнетения. Общество, молчаливо проникнутое этим духом, переменит свою вечную войну на мир. Могущество всё захватывающего и кажущегося непобедимым себялюбия уступит этой божественной силе. «На земле мир и в людях благоволение» не всегда будет только мечтою.

    Чаннинг.

    5. Mighty forces are at work in the world. No one can stop them. The signs of this: a new understanding of Christianity, respect for man, a new feeling of brotherhood and of the equal relation of all people to the Father of all. We see this, we feel this. And before this all oppressions will fall. Society, silently imbued with this spirit, will exchange its everlasting war for peace. The might of all-grasping self-love, which seems invincible, will give way to this divine force. “On earth peace, good will among men” will not always be only a dream.

    Channing.

    From An Address Delivered at Lenox, on the Anniversary of Emancipation in the British West In… · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    Mighty powers are at work in the world. Who can stay them ?
    A new comprehension of the Christian spirit — a new reverence for humanity, a new feeling of brotherhood, and of all men's relation to the common Father, — this is among the signs of our times.
    We see it; do we not feel it ? Before this all oppressions are to fall. Society, silently pervaded by this, is to change its aspect of universal warfare for peace.
    The power of selfishness, all-grasping and seemingly invincible, is to yield to this diviner energy. The song of angels, " On Earth Peace," will not always sound as fiction.
    Source text: archive.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Могущественные силы работают в мире. Никто не может остановить их.
    Могущество всё захватывающего и кажущегося непобедимым себялюбия уступит этой естественной силе.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. An Address Delivered at Lenox, on the Anniversary of Emancipation in the British West Indies (1 August 1842), The Complete Works of William Ellery Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., Routledge, 1884), p. 637, the closing paragraph.

    Close, with one sentence left out and a few words changed. 'Who can stay them?' becomes 'No one can stop them' (Никто не может остановить их); Channing's next sentence, 'God's word has gone forth, and "it cannot return to him void"' (Isaiah 55:11), is left out. 'A new comprehension of the Christian spirit' becomes 'a new understanding of Christianity', 'a new reverence for humanity' 'respect for man', and 'this is among the signs of our times' is moved to the front as 'The signs of this:' (Признаки этого). 'Do we not feel it?' becomes 'we feel it'; 'universal warfare' becomes 'eternal war' (вечную войну). 'The song of angels, "On Earth Peace," will not always sound as fiction' becomes '"On earth peace, good will toward men" will not always be only a dream': the angels are left out and the verse (Luke 2:14) completed. In Channing these are the closing words of his address on the anniversary of emancipation in the British West Indies, after 'the great stain on our country', American slavery; Tolstoy's thought leaves out that occasion. In На каждый день (April 5) 'this divine force' (божественной силе) becomes 'this natural force' (естественной силе).

  24. 5. Страсти могут быть сильнее совести, голос их может быть громче, но их крик совершенно другой, чем тот, которым говорит совесть. Они не обладают той силой, которой обладает голос совести. В своем торжестве они все-таки робеют перед этим тихим, глубоким и угрожающим голосом.

    Чаннинг.

    5. The passions may be stronger than conscience, their voice may be louder, but their cry is entirely different from the one with which conscience speaks. They do not have the power that the voice of conscience has. In their triumph they still quail before this quiet, deep, and threatening voice.

    Channing.

    From Self-Culture: Address introductory to the Franklin Lectures, Boston, September 1838 · shortened by Tolstoy .
    What Tolstoy read · The Message of Man: A Book of Ethical Scriptures, gathered by Stanton Coit
    In their very triumphs they are rebuked by the moral principle, and often cower before its still, deep, menacing voice.
    Source text: archive.org
    Channing’s own words
    The passions indeed may be stronger than the conscience, may lift up a louder voice ; but their clamor differs wholly from the tone of command in which the conscience speaks.
    They are not clothed with its authority, its binding power.
    In their very triumphs they are rebuked by the moral principle, and often cower before its still, deep, menacing voice.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Self-Culture: Address introductory to the Franklin Lectures, Boston, September 1838, The Works of William E. Channing (Boston, 1890), p. 16, on the 'disinterested principle' called conscience.

    Shortened. Coit opens his chapter with these lines, dropping Channing's 'indeed', the article before 'conscience', and 'its authority' ('They are not clothed with its binding power'); Tolstoy's «Страсти могут быть сильнее совести» (passions may be stronger than conscience) and «Они не обладают той силой» (they have not that power), with one noun, match Coit's shorter text, so Coit is probably what he read, as for July's and June's Channing. Tolstoy further leaves out 'of command' ('the tone of command in which the conscience speaks' becomes «тот, которым говорит совесть», the one in which conscience speaks), 'they are rebuked by the moral principle, and', and 'often': 'In their very triumphs ... often cower before its still, deep, menacing voice' becomes «В своем торжестве они все-таки робеют перед этим тихим, глубоким и угрожающим голосом» (in their triumph they still quail before this quiet, deep, and menacing voice). The scan of Coit garbles his first lines, so only his second number is quoted. The Jubilee list also names Albert Broadbent's selection, Channing: Passages from his Writings (London, 1903), not found online.

  25. 2. Спросите у большинства христиан, в чем главное зло, от которого Христос освободил человечество, и они скажут: от ада, от вечного огня, от наказания в будущем. Они соответственно этому думают, что спасение — это нечто такое, что другой может совершить для них. Люди убегают от внешнего ада, когда в действительности они носят в себе тот ад, которого они должны больше всего бояться. Спасение, более всего нужное человеку, то, которое дает освобождение человеку, это — спасение от зла в своей душе. Есть нечто много худшее внешнего наказания. Это — состояние души, возмутившейся против бога, состояние души, одаренной божественной силой, но отдающей себя во власть животных похотей, — души, которая, живя в виду бога, боится угрозы или гнева человека и предпочитает человеческую славу своему спокойному сознанию добродетели. Нет погибели хуже этой.

    Вот этого-то состояния души, которое нераскаявшийся человек уносит с собой в могилу, вот этого-то надо бояться.

    Спастись, в настоящем значении этого слова, значит поднять упавший дух, излечить больную душу, возвратить ей свободу мысли, совести, любви. Только в этом состоянии то спасение, которому учил Христос.

    К такому спасению направлено всё истинное учение христианства.

    Чаннинг.

    2. Ask most Christians what the chief evil is from which Christ delivered humanity, and they will say: from hell, from eternal fire, from punishment hereafter. Accordingly they think that salvation is something that another can accomplish for them. People flee from an outward hell, when in reality they carry within themselves the hell they ought most to fear. The salvation man most needs, the one that brings man deliverance, is salvation from the evil in his own soul. There is something far worse than outward punishment. It is the state of a soul that has rebelled against God, the state of a soul endowed with divine power but giving itself over to the power of animal lusts — a soul which, living in the sight of God, fears the threat or the anger of man and prefers human glory to its own quiet consciousness of virtue. There is no perdition worse than this.

    It is this very state of the soul, which the unrepentant man carries with him into the grave, it is this that we must fear.

    To be saved, in the true meaning of the word, is to raise the fallen spirit, to heal the sick soul, to restore to it freedom of thought, of conscience, of love. In this state alone is the salvation that Christ taught.

    All the true teaching of Christianity is directed toward such salvation.

    Channing.

    From The Great Purpose of Christianity: Discourse at the Installation of the Rev. M. I. Motte… · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “The salvation for which Christ shed his blood” becomes “the salvation that Christ taught,” the holy spirit drops out, and “all the truths of Christianity” become “All the true teaching of Christianity”; the chief evil “from which Christ came to save them” becomes the evil “from which Christ delivered humanity.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Recast in Tolstoy’s faith ›

    Channing’s own words
    Ask multitudes what is the chief evil from which Christ came to save them, and they will tell you, " From hell, from penal fires, from future punishment."
    Men are flying from an outward hell, when in truth they carry within them the hell which they should chiefly dread.
    To save, in the highest sense of that word, is to lift the fallen spirit from this depth, to heal the diseased mind, to restore it to energy and freedom of thought, conscience, and love.
    This was chiefly the salvation for which Christ shed his blood. For this the holy spirit is given ; and to this all the truths of Christianity conspire.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Great Purpose of Christianity: Discourse at the Installation of the Rev. M. I. Motte, Boston, 1828, The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London, 1884), pp. 177–78: the third illustration, 'the low ideas attached by multitudes to the word salvation'.

    Shortened, and changed in what it says of Christ. Tolstoy keeps Channing's order but leaves out his comparison of salvation to a neighbor quenching a fire, his passage on the word 'hell' ('used so seldom in the sacred pages', 'a metaphor'), most of his list of the soul's failings, and 'there meets its natural issue and inevitable retribution, in remorse, self-torture, and woes unknown on earth'. 'Ask multitudes what is the chief evil from which Christ came to save them' becomes «Спросите у большинства христиан, в чем главное зло, от которого Христос освободил человечество» (Ask most Christians what the chief evil is from which Christ freed mankind); 'penal fires' becomes «вечного огня» (eternal fire); 'It is sin; it is the state of a soul which has revolted from God' becomes «Это — состояние души, возмутившейся против бога», without 'It is sin'; 'No ruin can be compared to this' becomes «Нет погибели хуже этой». At the end, 'This was chiefly the salvation for which Christ shed his blood. For this the holy spirit is given; and to this all the truths of Christianity conspire' becomes «Только в этом состояние то спасение, которому учил Христос. К такому спасению направлено всё истинное учение христианства» (In this alone is the salvation that Christ taught. All the true teaching of Christianity is directed to such salvation): Christ's blood and the holy spirit are gone, salvation is what Christ taught, and 'all the truths of Christianity' becomes its 'true teaching'. The Jubilee text's «состояние» there probably stands for «состоит» (consists). The passage is not in Coit, Tileston, or Southgate.

  26. 1. Не верьте тому, чтобы в деле религии можно бы было не доверять разуму. Вера в силу разума лежит в основании всякой другой веры. Нельзя верить в бога, если мы умаляем значение той способности, посредством которой мы познаем бога. Если после добросовестного и беспристрастного использования наших лучших способностей известное вероучение кажется нам противоречивым или не согласным с главными истинами, в которых мы не сомневаемся, мы, несомненно, должны воздержаться от веры в это учение. Я более убежден в том, что моя разумная природа от бога, чем в том, что какая-либо книга есть выражение его воли.

    Чаннинг.

    1. Do not believe that in matters of religion we may distrust reason. Faith in the power of reason lies at the foundation of every other faith. We cannot believe in God if we belittle the faculty by which we know God. If, after a conscientious and impartial use of our best faculties, some doctrine seems to us self-contradictory or at odds with the chief truths we do not doubt, we must certainly withhold our belief from that doctrine. I am more certain that my rational nature is from God than that any book is the expression of his will.

    Channing.

    From Self-Denial, First Discourse · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Withholding belief from “a professed revelation” becomes withholding it from “a doctrine.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    Channing’s own words
    … have another objection to the doctrine that we must deny reason in order to follow revelation.
    Faith in this power lies at the foundation of all other faith.
    No trust can be placed in God if we discredit the faculty by which God is discerned.
    … if, after a deliberate and impartial use of our best faculties, a professed revelation seems to us plainly to disagree with itself or to clash with great principles which we cannot question, we ought not to hesitate to withhold from it our belief …
    I am surer that my rational nature is from God than that any book is an expression of his will.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Self-Denial, First Discourse (sermon on Matthew 16:24), in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., 1884), pp. 259-260, the section on whether self-denial means denying reason ('I am told that I must deny reason').

    The middle and closing sentences are Channing's, nearly word for word, taken from one page. The opening imperative is Tolstoy's summary of Channing's argument. Where Channing says to withhold belief from 'a professed revelation' that contradicts itself or clear principles, Tolstoy says a 'doctrine' (вероучение), which moves the test from claimed revelations to creeds. Tolstoy probably worked from Broadbent's Channing selection (London, 1903), which is on his source list; no copy was found online.

  27. 6. Наша главная и самая трудная обязанность, как членов общества, состоит в том, чтобы уметь пользоваться благами общества, но не подчиняться его ярму; быть готовым воспринимать мысли и убеждения других, но твердо держаться священного права своего суждения; воспринимать побуждения от других, но действовать по требованиям своей души; действовать с другими, но следовать своей совести; уметь соединять уважение к мнению других и самоопределение.

    Чаннинг.

    6. Our chief and hardest duty as members of society is to know how to use society’s benefits without bowing to its yoke; to be ready to receive the thoughts and convictions of others, yet hold fast to the sacred right of our own judgment; to take impulses from others, yet act by the demands of our own soul; to act with others, yet follow our own conscience; to know how to join respect for the opinions of others with self-determination.

    Channing.

    From Remarks on Associations · shortened by Tolstoy .
    The anthology Tolstoy probably took it from
    … as social beings, is to derive constant aid from society without taking its yoke ; …
    To open our minds to the thoughts and persuasions of others, and yet to hold fast the sacred right of private judgment ; to receive impulses from our fellow beings, and yet to act from our own souls ; 1 8. To sympathise with others, and yet to determine our own feelings ; to act with others, and yet to follow our own consciences ; to unite social deference and self-dominion.
    Source text: archive.org
    Channing’s own words
    Our great and most difficult duty, as social beings, is, to derive constant aid from society without taking its yoke ; to open our minds to the thoughts, reasonings, and persuasions of others, and yet to hold fast the sacred right of private judgment ; to receive impulses from our fellowbeings, and yet to act from our own souls ; to sympathise with others, and yet to determine our own feelings ; to act with others, and yet to follow our own consciences : to unite social deference and self-dominion ; …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Remarks on Associations (1829), in The Complete Works of W. E. Channing (London: Christian Life Publishing Co., 1884), p. 146, the paragraph on 'the propensity to rule' and our duty as social beings.

    Tolstoy's text matches Coit's excerpt (The Message of Man, 1902, on Tolstoy's source list), which already ends at 'self-dominion' and drops Channing's 'reasonings' (hence 'thoughts and convictions'). From Coit's version Tolstoy further drops 'to sympathise with others, and yet to determine our own feelings'. Channing's paragraph goes on to three more paired duties and Jesus as the model.

  28. 2. Идея бога, несмотря на всё свое величие, есть идея нашей духовной природы, только очищенная и возвеличенная до бесконечности.

    Основа понятия божества находится в нас.

    Чаннинг.

    2. The idea of God, sublime and awful as it is, is the idea of our own spiritual nature purified and enlarged to infinity.

    In ourselves are the elements of the Divinity.

    Channing.

    From Likeness to God, discourse at the ordination of the Rev. F. A. Farley, Providence, 1828 · close to the original .
    Tolstoy’s version, in English
    The idea of God, for all its greatness, is the idea of our own spiritual nature, only purified and exalted to infinity. The ground of the conception of the Deity lies within us.
    Channing’s own words
    The idea of God, sublime and awful as it is, is the idea of our own spiritual nature purified and enlarged to infinity. In ourselves are the elements of the Divinity.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Likeness to God, discourse at the ordination of the Rev. F. A. Farley, Providence, 1828 (Complete Works, 1884), Early in the discourse, after 'I answer we derive them from our own souls'.

    A close translation of two consecutive sentences; 'sublime and awful' becomes 'несмотря на всё свое величие' and 'the elements of the Divinity' becomes 'основа понятия божества'. Channing's own two sentences are printed here. (Broadbent's Channing selection, 1903, is the likely intermediary.)

    Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.

  29. 5. Дух божий охватывает наши души, проникает в них. Мы не видим его, потому что он слишком близок нам. И он близок нам не только для того, чтобы мы познавали его, но чтобы он действовал на нас, влиял на нас, сообщал нам свою божественность. В этом великий отеческий дар бога.

    Чаннинг.

    5. The spirit of God enfolds our souls and penetrates them. We do not see it, because it is too near to us. And it is near to us not only so that we may know it, but so that it may act upon us, influence us and impart its divinity to us. In this lies the great fatherly gift of God.

    Channing.

    From Christian Worship: Discourse at the Dedication of the Unitarian Congregational Church, N… · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Channing’s own words
    He pervades, penetrates our souls.
    We do not discern Him because He is too near, too inward, too deep to be recognised by our present imperfect consciousness. And He is thus near, not only to discern, but to act, to influence, to give his spirit, to communicate to us divinity. This is the great paternal gift of God.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Christian Worship: Discourse at the Dedication of the Unitarian Congregational Church, Newport, Rhode Island, 27 July 1836 (Complete Works, London, 1884), The paragraph beginning 'Again. When I call God the Father, I understand that He communicates Himself'.

    Close but shortened: four of Channing's sentences in order, with the three between the first and second left out ('All other beings, our nearest friends, are far from us...'). 'He' is made explicit as 'the Spirit of God'; 'too near, too inward, too deep to be recognised by our present imperfect consciousness' is cut to 'too near us'; 'to discern' is read as 'that we may know Him'. Broadbent's Channing selection (London, 1903), in the Jubilee list, is the likely intermediary.

  30. 2. Понимаем ли мы наше духовное братство? Понимаем ли наше происхождение от одного небесного отца, образ которого мы носим в себе и к совершенству которого мы постоянно можем приближаться? Признали ли мы то, что в душах всех людей, так же как и в нашей, одна и та же божественная жизнь? А между тем, это одно составляет истинную, свободную связь людей между собой.

    Для изменения строя жизни людей необходимо новое уважение людей друг к другу. До тех пор, пока люди смотрят друг на друга, как теперь, почти как на скотину, они не перестанут скотски обращаться с людьми, будут продолжать силою или хитростью делать их орудиями достижения своих целей. Не может быть братства между людьми до тех пор, пока они не поймут свое сродство и отношение к богу и то великое назначение, для которого дана им жизнь. Теперь же на такие мысли смотрят как на фантазии, и на учителя, который надеется найти в людях веру в свое братство и сыновность богу, смотрят как на мечтателя. А между тем признание этой простейшей истины христианства переворотило бы всё общество и установило бы между людьми такие отношения, которых мы не можем себе представить теперь. Никто из нас не может вообразить себе ту перемену в обращении, ту нежность, уважение, мягкость и ту энергию усилий для общественного улучшения, которые возникли бы по мере того, как люди проникали бы до духовной части друг друга и понимали бы значение души каждого самого низшего человеческого существа. Тогда те оскорбления, огорчения, угнетения, которых теперь мы и не замечаем, возмущали бы нас более, чем теперешние величайшие преступления. Тогда всякий человек был бы священен в глазах человека, и оскорбление, нанесенное человеку, представлялось бы враждою против бога. Признавая эту истину, человек не мог бы надругаться над ближним, потому что видел бы в нем божественное. Нельзя себе представить истины столь практической, как это учение. Да, нам нужно новое откровение — не о рае и аде, а о том духе, который живет в нас.

    Чаннинг.

    2. Do we understand our spiritual brotherhood? Do we understand our descent from one heavenly Father, whose image we bear within us and to whose perfection we may continually draw nearer? Have we recognized that in the souls of all men, as in our own, there is one and the same divine life? And yet this alone makes the true, free bond between men.

    To change the order of men’s life, a new respect of men for one another is needed. As long as men look on one another as they do now, almost as on cattle, they will not cease to treat men like cattle, and will go on making them, by force or by cunning, the tools for reaching their own ends. There can be no brotherhood among men until they understand their kinship and their relation to God, and the great calling for which life is given them. Now, though, such thoughts are looked on as fancies, and the teacher who hopes to find in men a faith in their brotherhood and their sonship to God is looked on as a dreamer. And yet the acknowledgment of this simplest truth of Christianity would turn all society upside down and would establish among men such relations as we cannot now imagine. None of us can picture the change in men’s dealings with one another, the tenderness, the respect, the gentleness, and the energy of effort for the betterment of society that would arise as men came to penetrate to the spiritual part of one another and to understand the significance of the soul of every human being, even the lowest. Then the insults, the hurts, the oppressions that we do not even notice now would outrage us more than the greatest crimes of today. Then every man would be sacred in the eyes of man, and an insult done to a man would seem enmity against God. A man who acknowledged this truth could not abuse his neighbor, for he would see the divine in him. No truth can be imagined so practical as this teaching. Yes, we need a new revelation — not of heaven and hell, but of the spirit that lives in us.

    Channing.

    From Three works · joined by Tolstoy from several places .
    Channing’s own words
    But do we understand our spiritual Brotherhood ? Do we feel ourselves to be derived from one Heavenly Parent, in whose image we are all made, and whose perfection we may constantly approach ? Do we feel that there is one divine life in our own and in all souls ? This seems to me the only true bond of man to man.
    There can be no spirit of brotherhood, no true peace, any further than men come to understand their affinity with and relation to God, and the infinite purpose for which He gave them life.
    With this great truth in his heart a man cannot insult a fellowman, for he beholds the Divine in the Human.
    Can you conceive then of a truth so practical as this doctrine of the greatness of man as a moral being?
    We need a New Revelation — not of Heaven or of Hell — but of the Spirit within ourselves.
    Source text: archive.org
    Another scan of the same 1884 London edition, used where the first scan's OCR is damaged
    I have also felt and continually insisted, that a new reverence for man was essential to the cause of social reform. As long as men regard one another as they now do, that is as little better than the brutes, they will continue to treat one another brutally. Each will strive, by craft or skill, to make others his tools.
    As yet these ideas are treated as a kind of spiritual romance; and the teacher who really expects men to see in themselves and one another the children of God, is smiled at as a visionary. The reception of this plainest truth of Christianity would revolutionise society, and create relations among men not dreamed of at the present day.
    None of us can conceive the change of manners, the new courtesy and sweetness, the mutual kindness, deference, and sympathy, the life and energy of efforts for social melioration, which are to spring up, in proportion as man shall penetrate beneath the body to the spirit, and shall learn what the lowest human being is. Then insults, wrongs, and oppressions, now hardly thought of, will give a deeper shock than we receive from crimes, which the laws punish with death. Then man will be sacred in man’s sight ; and to injure him will be regarded as open hostility towards God.
    Source text: archive.org
    The Works, Boston, American Unitarian Association, 1890
    With this great truth in his heart a man cannot insult a fellow-man, for he beholds the divine in the human.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Three works (Complete Works, London, 1884): the sermon 'Honour Due to All Men'; the 'Introductory Remarks' to the collected Works (1841); and 'God Revealed in the Universe and in Humanity', in The Perfect Life (1873), Paragraph 1: 'Honour Due to All Men', the paragraph beginning 'It may be said that Christianity has done much to awaken benevolence'. Paragraph 2: 'Introductory Remarks', the paragraph beginning 'These remarks might easily be extended'; then 'God Revealed in the Universe and in Humanity', the paragraph beginning 'Another practical use of the views now given of human nature' and its last two sentences.

    Tolstoy joins passages from three works into two paragraphs and translates them closely. Paragraph 1 is four consecutive sentences of 'Honour Due to All Men' ('This seems to me the only true bond of man to man' becomes 'this alone is the true, free bond of men'). Paragraph 2 is the 'Introductory Remarks', condensed: 'I have also felt and continually insisted, that' is dropped, and so are two sentences ('A union would spring up...'; 'Men would know the import of the word Brother...'); 'crimes, which the laws punish with death' becomes 'the greatest crimes of today'. It goes on with the sentence 'With this great truth in his heart a man cannot insult a fellow-man...' from 'God Revealed in the Universe and in Humanity', the rhetorical 'Can you conceive then of a truth so practical...?' turned into a statement ('No truth so practical can be imagined as this teaching'), and the last sentence of that discourse, 'We need a New Revelation...', to which Tolstoy adds 'Yes,'. The joining may be Broadbent's (Channing selection, London, 1903) or Tolstoy's own. The excerpts come from two copies of the 1884 edition and, for one sentence, the 1890 Boston edition.