Эта страница есть и на русском сайте: открыть по-русски.

CiceroЦицерон

28 passagesотрывков: 28

Each date opens its day beside the list, with these passages marked.Каждая дата открывает свой день рядом со списком, где отрывки этого автора отмечены.

  1. 1. Когда Сократа спросили, откуда он родом, он сказал, что он гражданин всего мира; он считал себя жителем и гражданином всей вселенной.

    Цицерон.

    1. When Socrates was asked where he was from, he said that he was a citizen of the whole world; he considered himself an inhabitant and a citizen of the whole universe.

    Cicero.

    From Tusculan Disputations · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · Craufurd Tait Ramage, Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    When Socrates was asked to what country he belonged, he said "that he was a citizen of the world." For he thought himself an inhabitant and citizen of the whole universe.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Socrates quidem cum rogaretur, cuiatem se esse diceret, 'mundanum' inquit; totius enim mundi se incolam et civem arbitrabatur.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    Socrates, indeed, when he was asked where he belonged to, replied, "The world;" for he looked upon himself as a citizen and inhabitant of the whole world.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculan Disputations, V.108 (V.37 in Ramage's numbering).

    Faithful to Ramage's English, Tolstoy's source for Cicero in December too: «гражданин всего мира» is Ramage's "a citizen of the world" (Cicero's one word is mundanum), and «жителем и гражданином всей вселенной» keeps Ramage's order and his "whole universe" (Yonge reverses the pair and says "the whole world"). «Откуда он родом» (where he was from) renders "to what country he belonged".

  2. 5. Что бы такое ни было то начало в человеке, которое чувствует, понимает, живет и существует, оно свято, божественно и потому должно быть вечно.

    Цицерон.

    5. Whatever that principle in man may be which feels, understands, lives, and exists, it is holy, divine, and therefore must be eternal.

    Cicero.

    From Tusculan Disputations · close to the original .
    Original · Latin
    … ita, quicquid est illud, quod sentit, quod sapit, quod vivit, quod viget, caeleste et divinum ob eamque rem aeternum sit necesse est.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    Whatever, then, that is which thinks, and which has understanding, and volition, and a principle of life, is heavenly and divine, and on that account must necessarily be eternal; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculan Disputations, I.27.66.

    Close: "whatever that is which feels, understands, lives, and is vigorous is heavenly and divine, and therefore must be eternal". Tolstoy adds "in man" and has "holy" (свято) for "heavenly" (caeleste).

  3. 6. Так же, как ты не видишь души человека, ты не видишь бога, но ты познаешь его в его творениях. Так же не можешь ты не признать божественную силу души, проявляющуюся в ее вечном стремлении к совершенству.

    Сенека.

    6. Just as you do not see a man’s soul, you do not see God, but you know him in his works. In the same way you cannot fail to acknowledge the divine power of the soul, which shows itself in its eternal striving toward perfection.

    Seneca [Cicero].

    From Tusculan Disputations · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Memory, invention, quickness of motion, and the beauty of virtue, Cicero’s signs of the soul’s divine power, become its “eternal striving toward perfection.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    Original · Latin
    … sic mentem hominis, quamvis eam non videas, ut deum non vides, tamen, ut deum adgnoscis ex operibus eius, sic ex memoria rerum et inventione et celeritate motus omnique pulchritudine virtutis vim divinam mentis adgnoscito.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    Thus, though you see not the soul of man, as you see not the Deity, yet, as by the contemplation of his works you are led to acknowledge a God, so you must own the divine power of the soul, from its remembering things, from its invention, from the quickness of its motion, and from all the beauty of virtue.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculan Disputations, I.28.70.

    Signed Seneca, but the sentence is Cicero's, Tusculan Disputations I.70. The first half is close. In the second Cicero names memory, invention, swiftness of motion, and all the beauty of virtue as the signs of the mind's divine power; Tolstoy puts "its eternal striving toward perfection" in their place. Where the misattribution came from was not found.

  4. 4. Помни, что смертен не ты, а твое тело, что живо не твое тело, а дух в теле. Не тело твое заставляет твой дух понимать твою жизнь и жизнь мира, а дух, живущий в тебе, двигает, чувствует, вспоминает, предвидит, управляет и руководит твоим телом и твоими поступками. И как невидимая сила управляет твоим телом, так должна быть и та невидимая сила, которая управляет всем миром.

    По Цицерону.

    4. Remember that it is not you who are mortal, but your body; that it is not your body that lives, but the spirit in the body. It is not your body that makes your spirit understand your life and the life of the world; it is the spirit living in you that moves, feels, remembers, foresees, and rules and guides your body and your actions. And as an invisible force rules your body, so there must also be that invisible force which rules the whole world.

    After Cicero.

    From De re publica VI · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “Know then that you are a god” is dropped, and Cicero’s comparison, the mind ruling the body as the supreme god rules the world, becomes an inference: “there must also be that invisible force which rules the whole world.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Recast in Tolstoy’s faith ›

    Original · Latin
    … non esse te mortalem, sed corpus hoc; nec enim tu is es, quem forma ista declarat, sed mens cuiusque is est quisque, non ea figura, quae digito demonstrari potest.
    Deum te igitur scito esse, si quidem est deus, qui viget, qui sentit, qui meminit, qui providet, qui tam regit et moderatur et movet id corpus, cui praepositus est, quam hunc mundum ille princeps deus, …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · Francis Barham (1841), in the Bohn edition of C. D. Yonge, 1877
    … consider your body only, not yourself, as mortal. For it is not your outward form which constitutes your being, but your mind; not that substance which is palpable to the senses, but your spiritual nature.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. De re publica VI (Somnium Scipionis), VI.24.26.

    Africanus to Scipio in the Dream. Kept: not you but your body is mortal; the mind lives, feels, remembers, foresees, rules, and moves the body. Changed: "know then that you are a god" is dropped, and Cicero's comparison (the mind rules the body as the supreme god rules the world) becomes an inference: "so there must be an invisible power that rules the whole world". "Understand your life and the life of the world" is Tolstoy's.

  5. 3. Известный предел жизни должен существовать, и так же, как плоды деревьев и земли, так же, как времена года, всё должно начинаться, продолжаться и проходить. Мудрые люди охотно подчиняются этому порядку.

    Цицерон.

    3. There must be a certain limit to life, and just like the fruits of trees and of the earth, just like the seasons of the year, everything must begin, continue, and pass away. Wise people willingly submit to this order.

    Cicero.

    From Cato Maior de Senectute · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Ramage’s English, which Tolstoy follows, already expands Cicero; Tolstoy reads its “seasons” as “the seasons of the year,” a third comparison, and has wise people submit “to this order.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    It was absolutely necessaiy that some term, …
    … as it is with the fruits of trees, and of the earth, seasons should be allowed for their …
    … and at last to drop. This wise men wdl submit to, …
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Sed tamen necesse fuit esse aliquid extremum et, tamquam in arborum bacis terraeque fructibus maturitate tempestiva quasi vietum et caducum, quod ferundum est molliter sapienti.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · E. S. Shuckburgh, 1900
    But after all some "last" was inevitable, just as to the berries of a tree and the fruits of the earth there comes in the fulness of time a period of decay and fall.
    A wise man will not make a grievance of this.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Cato Maior de Senectute, § 5 (Senect. 2 in Ramage).

    Tolstoy follows the English in Ramage, which expands Cicero. Cicero: "some last [act] there had to be", and, as with the berries of trees and the fruits of the earth, a ripeness when they wither and fall, "which the wise man must bear calmly" (quod ferundum est molliter sapienti). Ramage: "some term, some period should be set", and "as it is with the fruits of trees, and of the earth, seasons should be allowed for their springing, growing, ripening, and at last to drop. This wise men will submit to, and cheerfully bear" (the scan garbles "springing, growing, ripening" and reads "wdl" for "will"). Tolstoy's «всё должно начинаться, продолжаться и проходить» (all must begin, continue, and pass) is Ramage's four stages, and «Мудрые люди охотно подчиняются» (wise men willingly submit) is Ramage's "will submit to, and cheerfully bear". He reads Ramage's "seasons" as the seasons of the year and makes them a third comparison («так же, как времена года»), adds «этому порядку» (to this order), and leaves out the giants warring against the gods. The change from Cicero is mostly Ramage's; the seasons are Tolstoy's. Ramage is among Tolstoy's sources for Cicero in December and January.

  6. 5. Всё неопределенно, туманно и мимолетно, одна добродетель и ясна и не может быть сокрушена никаким насилием.

    Цицерон.

    5. Everything is uncertain, hazy, and fleeting; virtue alone is clear and cannot be shattered by any violence.

    Cicero.

    From Philippicae · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Virtue “planted firm with very deep roots” (in Ramage, whom Tolstoy follows, “fixed with deep roots”) becomes virtue that “is clear,” and that it “can never be moved from its position” is left out.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    Quanquam omnia alia incerta sunt, caduca, mobilia: …
    … virtue alone is fixed with deep roots; it can neither be destroyed by any violence or moved from its place.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Nam cum alia omnia falsa, incerta sint, caduca, mobilia, virtus est una altissimis defixa radicibus; quae numquam vi ulla labefactari potest, numquam demoveri loco.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1903
    Although all other things are uncertain, fleeting, transitory; virtue alone is planted firm with very deep roots; it can not be undermined by any violence; it can never be moved from its position.
    Source text: raw.githubusercontent.com
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Philippicae, IV.13 (Philip. iv. 5 in Ramage).

    Tolstoy follows Ramage's English: "Though all other things are uncertain, evanescent, and ephemeral, virtue alone is fixed with deep roots; it can neither be destroyed by any violence or moved from its place" (the scan reads "ephemei^"). «неопределенно, туманно и мимолетно» are Ramage's three adjectives, and «не может быть сокрушена никаким насилием» is his "destroyed by any violence". Tolstoy changes "fixed with deep roots" (altissimis defixa radicibus) to «ясна» (clear), leaves out "moved from its place", and drops the setting: Cicero is urging the Roman people to keep the courage their ancestors left them, by which they conquered Italy and destroyed Carthage. Yonge's English, from the modern Latin text («Nam cum alia omnia falsa, incerta sint»), has "uncertain, fleeting, transitory".

  7. 5. Когда думаешь о свойствах души, то гораздо труднее понять, что такое душа, заключенная в теле, где она живет, как в чужой стране, чем то, что она такое, когда она освободится от тела и соединится с тем, кого она себя чувствует частью.

    По Цицерону.

    5. When you think about the properties of the soul, it is far harder to understand what the soul is while enclosed in the body, where it lives as in a foreign land, than what it is when it has been freed from the body and united with him of whom it feels itself a part.

    After Cicero.

    From Tusculanae Disputationes · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The soul that “has arrived at the free æther, which is, if I may so say, its proper, its own habitation” becomes one “united with him of whom it feels itself a part”: the heaven becomes a person, and the soul a part of him; the body, “a place which, as it were, does not belong to it,” becomes “a foreign land.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Recast in Tolstoy’s faith ›

    Original · Latin
    … mihi quidem naturam animi intuenti multo difficilior occurrit cogitatio, multo obscurior, qualis animus in corpore sit tamquam alienae domi, quam qualis, cum exierit et in liberum caelum quasi domum suam venerit.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    For my own part, when I reflect on the nature of the soul, it appears to me a far more perplexing and obscure question to determine what is its character while it is in the body--a place which, as it were, does not belong to it--than to imagine what it is when it leaves it, and has arrived at the free æther, which is, if I may so say, its proper, its own habitation.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculanae Disputationes, I.51.

    A free rendering, as «По Цицерону» (after Cicero) says. Cicero: to him, considering the nature of the soul, it is much harder and more obscure to think what the soul is like in the body, "as in another's house" (tamquam alienae domi), than what it is like when it has gone out and come "into the free heaven, as into its own home" (in liberum caelum quasi domum suam). Tolstoy keeps the comparison, makes "another's house" «как в чужой стране» (as in a foreign land), and replaces the free heaven, the soul's own home, with «соединится с тем, кого она себя чувствует частью» (unites with him of whom it feels itself a part): the heaven becomes a person, and the soul a part of him. Not in Ramage, and not in Thoughts of Wise Men (1903).

  8. 4. Сильные, коротко выраженные мысли много содействуют улучшению жизни.

    Цицерон.

    4. Strong thoughts, briefly expressed, do much for the improvement of life.

    Cicero.

    Probably from De finibus bonorum et malorum · reworded by Tolstoy .
    Not in Leo Tolstoy as Editor

    Cicero is only a candidate: in De finibus II.20 he calls Epicurus’s Principal Doctrines “sentences of the greatest weight for living happily, briefly expressed,” but the line may come through an anthology, or from Seneca’s Letter 94.43.

    Original · Latin
    … in alio vero libro, in quo breviter comprehensis gravissimis sententiis quasi oracula edidisse sapientiae dicitur, scribit his verbis …
    … quia gravissimae sint ad beate vivendum breviter enuntiatae sententiae …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1853
    But in another book, in which he utters opinions of the greatest weight in a concise form of words, and in which he is said to have delivered oracles of wisdom, he writes in those words which you are well acquainted with, 0 Torquatus.
    … because they are sentiments of the greatest gravity intended to guide men to a happy life, and enunciated with suitable brevity.
    Source text: archive.org
    Related · Seneca, Epistulae morales ad Lucilium 94
    Quis autem negabit feriri quibusdam praeceptis efficaciter etiam inperitissimos? velut his brevissimis vocibus, sed multum habentibus ponderis: …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    Details

    A likely source, not certain. De finibus bonorum et malorum, II.20 (II.7.20).

    The nearest passage found in Cicero: in De finibus II.20 he calls Epicurus's Principal Doctrines (κύριαι δόξαι) "sentences of the greatest weight for living happily, briefly expressed" (gravissimae ad beate vivendum breviter enuntiatae sententiae). «Сильные» answers gravissimae, «коротко выраженные» breviter enuntiatae, «мысли» sententiae, and «много содействуют улучшению жизни» (do much to better life) ad beate vivendum; Cicero speaks of one book of Epicurus's, Tolstoy of strong short thoughts in general. Candidate: the line may come through an anthology, and Seneca says much the same in the sentence after the source of 5-4.2 (Letter 94.43, quoted as related: precepts in "very brief sayings, but having much weight" strike even the most ignorant). If the source is Seneca's, the signature is wrong; this is not certain. Yonge's scan reads "0 Torquatus" for "O Torquatus".

  9. 7. Разумность, наблюдаемая в природе, побуждающая человека делать должное и удерживающая от дурного, становится законом не потому, что записана в книгах, но потому, что это закон одинаково вечный, божественный, как и разум человеческий. И потому истинный, непреложный закон, повелевающий и запрещающий, есть разум высшего существа.

    Цицерон.

    7. The rationality observed in nature, which moves man to do what he ought and keeps him from what is bad, becomes law not because it is written in books, but because it is a law as eternal and divine as human reason. And therefore the true, unalterable law, which commands and forbids, is the reason of the Supreme Being.

    Cicero.

    From De legibus · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    A law “co-eternal with that of the divine mind” (in Ramage, whom Tolstoy follows, “co-eternal with the divine mind”) becomes a law “as eternal and divine as human reason,” so human reason takes the place of the divine mind.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    For it was reason derived from the nature of things, impelling man to what is right, and deterring him from what is wrong, which does not then begin to be law, when it is found written down in books, but was so from the first moment of its existence.
    It was co-eternal with the divine mind, vv^herefore true and ultimate law fitted to order and to forbid is the mind of the supreme being.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Erat enim ratio, profecta a rerum natura, et ad recte faciendum inpellens et a delicto avocans, quae non tum denique incipit lex esse quom scripta est, sed tum quom orta est.
    Orta autem est simul cum mente divina.
    Quam ob rem lex vera atque princeps, apta ad iubendum et ad vetandum, ratio est recta summi Iovis.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · Francis Barham (1841), reprinted in C. D. Yonge's The Treatises of M. T. Cicero, 1853
    … and which does not begin for the first time to be a law when it is drawn up in writing, but from the first moment that it exists.
    And this existence of moral obligation is coeternal with that of the divine mind.
    Therefore, the true and supreme law, whose commands and prohibitions are equally authoritative, is the right reason of the Sovereign Jupiter.
    Source text: archive.org
    Related · Deuteronomy
    Ибо заповедь сия, которую я заповедую тебе сегодня, не недоступна для тебя и не далека; …
    … она не на небе, чтобы можно ''было'' говорить: «кто взошел бы для нас на небо и принес бы ее нам, и дал бы нам услышать ее, и мы исполнили бы ее?»
    … но весьма близко к тебе слово сие: ''оно'' в устах твоих и в сердце твоем, чтобы исполнять его.
    Source text: ru.wikisource.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. De legibus, II.10 (Leg. ii. 4 in Ramage).

    Tolstoy follows Ramage's English, which is on his list of sources: «записана в книгах» is Ramage's "written down in books" (Cicero has only scripta est, "is written"), and «разум высшего существа» his "the mind of the supreme being" (Cicero: "the right reason of supreme Jupiter"). Cicero's "reason derived from the nature of things" becomes «Разумность, наблюдаемая в природе» (reasonableness observed in nature), and "impelling man to what is right, and deterring him from what is wrong" is kept («побуждающая человека делать должное и удерживающая от дурного»). Cicero says this reason became law when it arose, together with the divine mind ("co-eternal with the divine mind", in Ramage); Tolstoy writes that it is law «потому, что это закон одинаково вечный, божественный, как и разум человеческий» (because it is a law equally eternal and divine, as human reason is too), so human reason takes the place of the divine mind. "True and ultimate law fitted to order and to forbid" is kept as «истинный, непреложный закон, повелевающий и запрещающий». Cicero gives the example of Sextus Tarquinius, who broke the eternal law against Lucretia though Rome had no written law against rape. The scan of Ramage reads "vv^herefore". The same day's 5-19.4 quotes Deuteronomy 30:11–14 (related): its wording is not the Synodal's. Tolstoy has «Заповедь эта» for «Ибо заповедь сия», «Не на небе она» for «она не на небе», «сказать» for «говорить», «достал ее нам» for «принес бы ее нам», «возвестил ее нам» for «дал бы нам услышать ее», and «это слово» for «слово сие»; the rest is the Synodal's. Where that version comes from was not found.

  10. 3. Мир — великое благо, но если мир достигается рабством, то он становится не благом, а бедствием. Мир — это свобода, основанная на признании прав всякого человека, рабство — это отрицание прав человека, его человеческого достоинства. И потому надо жертвовать всем для достижения мира и еще больше для избавления от рабства.

    По Цицерону.

    3. Peace is a great good, but if peace is attained through slavery, it becomes not a good but a calamity. Peace is freedom founded on the recognition of the rights of every man; slavery is the denial of the rights of man, of his human dignity. And therefore we must sacrifice everything to attain peace, and still more to be delivered from slavery.

    After Cicero.

    From Philippics · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “To be repelled, if need be, not only by war, but even by death” becomes “we must sacrifice everything to attain peace, and still more to be delivered from slavery,” so war drops out, and “liberty in tranquillity” becomes “freedom founded on the recognition of the rights of every man.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    Peace is pleasant, and most profitable; …
    … to be resisted not only by war, but even by death.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Et nomen pacis dulce est et ipsa res salutaris, sed inter pacem et servitutem plurimum interest.
    Pax est tranquilla libertas, servitus postremum malorum omnium non modo bello, sed morte etiam repellendum.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1903
    The name of peace is sweet, the thing itself is most salutary. But between peace and slavery there is a wide difference.
    Peace is liberty in tranquillity; slavery is the worst of all evils,—to be repelled, if need be, not only by war, but even by death.
    Source text: raw.githubusercontent.com
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Philippics, II.113.

    "After Cicero": Tolstoy's development of one passage of the Second Philippic. Cicero: "the name of peace is sweet and the thing itself salutary, but between peace and slavery there is a very great difference. Peace is tranquil liberty; slavery is the last of all evils, to be repelled not only by war but even by death." Kept: peace as a great good («великое благо»), and the difference between peace and slavery, as «если мир достигается рабством, то он становится не благом, а бедствием» (if peace is won by slavery, it becomes a calamity in place of a good). Changed: "tranquil liberty" becomes «свобода, основанная на признании прав всякого человека» (freedom founded on the recognition of every man's rights), and slavery «отрицание прав человека, его человеческого достоинства» (the denial of man's rights, of his human dignity). Cicero's "non modo bello sed morte etiam repellendum" (Yonge: "to be repelled, if need be, not only by war, but even by death") becomes «надо жертвовать всем для достижения мира и еще больше для избавления от рабства» (one must sacrifice everything to attain peace, and still more to be free of slavery): war drops out. Ramage, on Tolstoy's list of sources and his source for Cicero in other months, prints the passage under "Peace" with the reference "Philip. ii. 44"; with so free a version, whether Tolstoy read it there cannot be shown. The scan of Ramage is poor ("peace ami slavery", "liberty m tranquillity").

  11. 6. Не будь рабом одного или немногих. Делаясь рабом всех, ты делаешься другом всех.

    По Цицерону.

    6. Do not be the slave of one or of a few. By becoming the slave of all, you become the friend of all.

    After Cicero.

    Source not found yet .

    Not found yet.

    Not found. The thought («Не будь рабом одного или немногих. Делаясь рабом всех, ты делаешься другом всех»: do not be the slave of one or of a few; making yourself the slave of all, you make yourself the friend of all) is signed «По Цицерону», after Cicero, so Tolstoy reworked something; the passage he read was not identified. The nearest in thought is Paul, 1 Corinthians 9:19, "though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more", which is not Cicero.

    Searched: Ramage's Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors (slave, slavery, servitus, servire, paucorum, unius, friend of all); the saved English of Cicero (Yonge's Treatises and Tusculans, Shuckburgh, the Philippics); Thoughts of Wise Men (1903) and Jubilee vols. 41–43 and 45 for «рабом всех», «другом всех», «рабом одного»; web searches in English. Cicero's "sic ego non omnibus ... servio" (Ad familiares VII.24) and "legum ... omnes servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus" (Pro Cluentio 146) speak of serving all or the laws, but neither says what this thought says.

  12. 7. Человеческое достоинство и свобода свойственны нам. Будем же хранить их или умрем с достоинством.

    Цицерон.

    7. Human dignity and freedom are natural to us. Let us then keep them, or die with dignity.

    Cicero.

    From Philippicae · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “We have been born to glory and to liberty” (in Ramage, whom Tolstoy follows, “born for the enjoyment of honour and liberty”) becomes “Human dignity and freedom are natural to us”: what we were born for becomes what is ours, and honor becomes human dignity.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    There is nothing more abommable than disgrace, nothing more base than slavery. We have been born for the enjoyment of honour and liberty; let us either retain these or die with dignity.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Nihil est detestabilius dedecore, nihil foedius servitute.
    Ad decus et ad libertatem nati sumus; aut haec teneamus aut cum dignitate moriamur.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1903
    There is nothing more detestable than disgrace; nothing more shameful than slavery. We have been born to glory and to liberty; let us either preserve them or die with dignity.
    Source text: raw.githubusercontent.com
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Philippicae, III.36 (Philip. iii. 14 in Ramage).

    Cicero to the Roman people against Antony: "We have been born for the enjoyment of honour and liberty; let us either retain these or die with dignity" (Ramage; Latin "Ad decus et ad libertatem nati sumus; aut haec teneamus aut cum dignitate moriamur"). Tolstoy's second sentence, «Будем же хранить их или умрем с достоинством», is Ramage's close word for word. The first changes the claim: "we have been born for honour (decus) and liberty" becomes «Человеческое достоинство и свобода свойственны нам» (human dignity and freedom are proper to us), with "honour" made "human dignity". Ramage's first sentence ("nothing more abominable than disgrace, nothing more base than slavery") is left out; the scan reads "abommable".

  13. 7. Самые ясные понятия часто затемняются сложными рассуждениями.

    Цицерон.

    7. The clearest notions are often obscured by complicated reasoning.

    Cicero.

    From De natura deorum · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    Perspicuitas enim argumentatione elevatur.
    The clearest subjects are often obscured by lengthened reasoning.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Nam ego neque in causis, si quid est evidens, de quo inter omnis conveniat, argumentari soleo …
    … perspicuitas enim argumentatione elevatur …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · Thomas Francklin (1741), revised by C. D. Yonge in The Treatises of M. T. Cicero, 1853
    … for, when I plead, I do not dwell upon any point agreed to be self-evident, because long reasoning only serves to confound the clearest matters; …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. De natura deorum, III.9 (Nat. D. iii. 4 in Ramage).

    Tolstoy translates Ramage's English, "The clearest subjects are often obscured by lengthened reasoning", closely: «Самые ясные понятия часто затемняются сложными рассуждениями» (the clearest notions are often darkened by complicated reasonings). Ramage widens Cicero, whose Cotta says of his practice in court that where a thing is evident and agreed by all he does not argue it, "for clearness is weakened by argument" (perspicuitas enim argumentatione elevatur); "often" is Ramage's. Cotta is answering Balbus, who had spent long arguments proving that the gods exist.

  14. 2. Награда добродетели находится в самом сознании доброго поступка.

    Цицерон.

    2. The reward of virtue lies in the very consciousness of a good deed.

    Cicero.

    Probably from Philippicae · reworded by Tolstoy .
    Not in Leo Tolstoy as Editor

    Cicero is only a candidate: the nearest is Philippic II.114 in Ramage, “There is a sufficient recompense in the very consciousness of a noble deed,” where the deed is the killing of Caesar; Tolstoy’s subject, the reward of virtue, is in De re publica VI.8, which may be his source instead, or he may have joined the two.

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    There is a sufficient recompense in the very consciousness of a noble deed.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Etsi enim satis in ipsa conscientia pulcherrimi facti fructus erat, tamen mortali immortalitatem non arbitror esse contemnendam.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1903
    For although in the very consciousness of a glorious action there is a certain reward, still I do not consider immortality of glory a thing to be despised by one who is himself mortal.
    Source text: raw.githubusercontent.com
    Details

    A likely source, not certain. Philippicae, II.114 (Philip. ii. 44 in Ramage).

    Probably Ramage's "There is a sufficient recompense in the very consciousness of a noble deed" (Philippic II.114, on the men who killed Caesar: "although in the very consciousness of a glorious action there is a certain reward, still I do not consider immortality of glory a thing to be despised by one who is himself mortal"), the source of this month's other Cicero entries (7-3.7, 7-19.7). «в самом сознании доброго поступка» matches "in the very consciousness of a noble deed" (in ipsa conscientia pulcherrimi facti), with "most glorious deed" made «доброго» (good). Tolstoy's subject, «Награда добродетели» (the reward of virtue), is not in Philippic II: the deed there is the murder of Caesar, and Cicero speaks of its "fruit" (fructus). The phrase is in De re publica VI.8, "Sed quamquam sapientibus conscientia ipsa factorum egregiorum amplissimum virtutis est praemium" (to the wise the very consciousness of noble deeds is the fullest reward of virtue), which is not in Ramage and was not saved here; that sentence may be Tolstoy's source instead, or he may have joined the two. Hence candidate.

  15. 5. Живет свободно только тот, кто находит радость в исполнении своего долга, кто обдумал тот путь, который он должен пройти в жизни; кто подчиняется нравственному закону не из страха, а уважает и слушается его потому, что считает, что так должно; над кем нет иной власти, кроме собственного желания и суждения.

    Цицерон.

    5. He alone lives freely who finds joy in doing his duty, who has thought out the path he must travel in life; who submits to the moral law not out of fear, but respects and obeys it because he holds that so it ought to be; over whom there is no power but his own desire and judgment.

    Cicero.

    From Paradoxa Stoicorum · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The man who “obeys the laws of his country, not out of dread” (in Ramage, whom Tolstoy follows, “does not submit to the laws from fear”) becomes one who “submits to the moral law not out of fear,” so the laws of the state become the moral law; Cicero’s question, “Who therefore lives as he wishes,” becomes a statement: “He alone lives freely who.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    Who therefore lives as he wishes, but the man who leads an upright life, who rejoices in the performance of his duty, who has considered well and thoughtfully the path of life he ought to pursue?
    … who does not submit to the laws from fear, but pays …
    … respect and obedience to them because he considers that this is the most proper course; …
    … nor is there anything which has more authority with him than …
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Quid est enim libertas? Potestas vivendi, ut velis.
    Quis igitur vivit, ut volt, nisi qui recte vivit? qui gaudet officio, cui vivendi via considerata atque provisa est, qui ne legibus quidem propter metum paret, sed eas sequitur et colit, quia id salutare esse maxime iudicat, …
    … nec est ulla res, quae plus apud eum polleat quam ipsius voluntas atque iudicium; …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · Cyrus R. Edmonds, 1860
    For what is liberty? The power of living as you please.
    … the man who obeys the laws of his country, not out of dread, …
    … the man who is swayed by nothing so much as by his own inclination and judgment ; …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Paradoxa Stoicorum, V.34 (Paradox. v. 1 in Ramage).

    Tolstoy translates Ramage's English of Paradoxa Stoicorum V.34, shortened: "Who therefore lives as he wishes, but the man who leads an upright life, who rejoices in the performance of his duty, who has considered well and thoughtfully the path of life he ought to pursue? who does not submit to the laws from fear, but pays respect and obedience to them because he considers that this is the most proper course; ... nor is there anything which has more authority with him than his own wishes and judgment." Ramage's words show through: «находит радость в исполнении своего долга» is "rejoices in the performance of his duty", «обдумал тот путь, который он должен пройти в жизни» "considered ... the path of life he ought to pursue", «уважает и слушается его» "pays respect and obedience". Tolstoy makes Cicero's question a statement, «Живет свободно только тот, кто» (only he lives freely who), for "Who therefore lives as he wishes, but"; turns "the laws" (legibus, the laws of the state) into «нравственному закону» (the moral law); gives "because he considers that this is the most proper course" (quia id salutare esse maxime iudicat, because he judges it most salutary) as «потому, что считает, что так должно» (because he thinks it ought to be so); and makes "nor is there anything which has more authority with him than his own wishes and judgment" «над кем нет иной власти, кроме собственного желания и суждения» (over whom there is no power but his own wish and judgment). Left out: "the man who leads an upright life", that he says, does, and thinks nothing but freely, that his plans arise from himself, and fortune yielding to him. Ramage's scan prints a running head inside the sentence and "Ins" for "his", so its excerpts are cut around them.

  16. 5. Последний день несет нам не уничтожение, а только перемену.

    Цицерон.

    5. The last day brings us not annihilation, but only a change.

    Cicero.

    From Tusculanae disputationes · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Cicero’s supposition, “if that last day does not occasion an entire extinction, but a change of abode only,” becomes an assertion, “The last day brings us not annihilation, but only a change,” and his other branch, that death “absolutely puts an end to us,” is left out.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    Original · Latin
    … nam si supremus ille dies non extinctionem, sed commutationem adfert loci, quid optabilius?
    … sin autem perimit ac delet omnino, quid melius quam in mediis vitae laboribus obdormiscere et ita coniventem somno consopiri sempiterno?
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    For if that last day does not occasion an entire extinction, but a change of abode only, what can be more desirable?
    And if it, on the other hand, destroys, and absolutely puts an end to us, what can be preferable to the having a deep sleep fall on us, in the midst of the fatigues of life, and being thus overtaken, to sleep to eternity?
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculanae disputationes, I.117.

    Cicero argues near the end of Tusculan Disputations I that death is no evil either way: "For if that last day does not occasion an entire extinction, but a change of abode only, what can be more desirable? And if it, on the other hand, destroys, and absolutely puts an end to us, what can be preferable to ... sleep to eternity?" Tolstoy keeps the first branch as an assertion, «Последний день несет нам не уничтожение, а только перемену» (the last day brings us not annihilation but only change): Cicero's "if" (si) and his second branch are dropped, and "commutationem ... loci" (a change of place) becomes «перемену» (a change). The intermediary was not found; the line is not in Ramage's Latin Authors (searched: extinctionem, commutation, supremus, last day) or the English anthologies saved.

  17. 4. Нельзя найти следов земного происхождения душ. В душах нет ничего составного, ничего, что могло бы возникнуть или образоваться на земле; нет даже ничего сродного с влагой, воздухом или огнем. В самом деле: ни в воде, ни в воздухе, ни в огне нет ничего, что обладало бы способностью помнить, понимать, мыслить, удерживать прошлое, заглядывать в будущее и постигать, осмысливать настоящее. Всё это свойственно только духовным существам, т. е. богам, и вы никогда не будете в состоянии указать этому иного происхождения, кроме божественного. А потому всякое существо, раз оно ощущает, мыслит, живет, действует, должно быть небесного и божественного происхождения и потому должно быть вечным. Бога нельзя представить себе иначе, как духовным, свободным от примеси чего-либо тленного. Таков же и человеческий дух.

    Цицерон.

    4. No traces can be found of an earthly origin of souls. In souls there is nothing compound, nothing that could have arisen or been formed on earth; there is not even anything akin to moisture, air, or fire. Indeed, neither in water, nor in air, nor in fire is there anything that possesses the power to remember, to understand, to think, to retain the past, to look into the future, and to grasp and make sense of the present. All this is proper only to spiritual beings, that is, to gods, and you will never be able to point to any origin for it other than a divine one. And therefore every being, since it senses, thinks, lives, and acts, must be of heavenly and divine origin, and therefore must be eternal. God cannot be conceived otherwise than as spiritual, free from any admixture of anything perishable. Such too is the human spirit.

    Cicero.

    From Tusculanae disputationes · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Original · Latin
    'Animorum nulla in terris origo inveniri potest; nihil enim est in animis mixtum atque concretum aut quod ex terra natum atque fictum esse videatur, nihil ne aut umidum quidem aut flabile aut igneum.
    … his enim in naturis nihil inest, quod vim memoriae, mentis, cogitationis habeat, quod et praeterita teneat et futura provideat et complecti possit praesentia. quae sola divina sunt, nec invenietur umquam, unde ad hominem venire possint nisi a deo.
    … ita, quicquid est illud, quod sentit, quod sapit, quod vivit, quod viget, caeleste et divinum ob eamque rem aeternum sit necesse est.
    … nec vero deus ipse, qui intellegitur a nobis, alio modo intellegi potest nisi mens soluta quaedam et libera, segregata ab omni concretione mortali, omnia sentiens et movens ipsaque praedita motu sempiterno. hoc e genere atque eadem e natura est humana mens.'
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    The origin of the soul of man is not to be found upon earth, for there is nothing in the soul of a mixed or concrete nature, or that has any appearance of being formed or made out of the earth; nothing even humid, or airy, or fiery.
    For what is there in natures of that kind which has the power of memory, understanding, or thought? which can recollect the past, foresee the future, and comprehend the present? for these capabilities are confined to divine beings; nor can we discover any source from which men could derive them, but from God.
    Whatever, then, that is which thinks, and which has understanding, and volition, and a principle of life, is heavenly and divine, and on that account must necessarily be eternal; …
    … nor can God himself, who is known to us, be conceived to be anything else except a soul free and unembarrassed, distinct from all mortal concretion, …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Нельзя найти следов земного происхождения душ. В душах нет ничего составного, ничего, чтò могло бы возникнуть или образоваться на земле; нет ничего сродного с влагой, воздухом или огнем. Ни в воде, ни в воздухе, ни в огне нет ничего такого, чтò обладало бы способностью помнить, понимать, мыслить, удерживать прошлое, заглядывать в будущее и постигать, осмысливать настоящее.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculanae disputationes, I.66, quoting Cicero's lost Consolatio.

    Cicero quotes his own lost Consolatio, and Tolstoy translates the quotation closely to its end, "hoc e genere atque eadem e natura est humana mens" (of this kind and nature is the human mind), «Таков же и человеческий дух». Left out: "singularis est igitur quaedam natura atque vis animi seiuncta ab his usitatis notisque naturis" (the soul has a nature and power of its own, apart from the common, known natures) and God "omnia sentiens et movens ipsaque praedita motu sempiterno" (perceiving and moving all things, and endowed with eternal motion). «Духовным существам, т. е. богам» (to spiritual beings, that is, to gods) glosses "quae sola divina sunt" (which alone are divine), «всякое существо, раз оно ощущает, мыслит, живет, действует» (every being, once it feels, thinks, lives, acts) is "quicquid est illud, quod sentit, quod sapit, quod vivit, quod viget", and «духовным» (spiritual) stands for "mens" (mind) in «Бога нельзя представить себе иначе, как духовным, свободным от примеси чего-либо тленного» (God cannot be conceived otherwise than as spiritual, free from admixture of anything perishable). February traced one sentence of the same passage (2-12.5). In На каждый день (3 April, 5) Tolstoy kept the first half and ended it in his own words («что-то такое, чтò мы называем духом»). The intermediary was not found; the passage is not in Ramage's Latin Authors (searched: Animorum, origo).

  18. 8. Мудрость Сократа состояла в том, что он не думал, что знал то, чего не знал.

    Цицерон.

    8. The wisdom of Socrates consisted in his not thinking that he knew what he did not know.

    Cicero.

    From Academica · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The rule by which Cicero explains the oracle’s verdict, “this alone is the whole of wisdom” (in Ramage, whom Tolstoy follows, “all wisdom consists in this”), becomes a statement about one man, “The wisdom of Socrates consisted in his not thinking that he knew what he did not know,” and Apollo drops out.

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    For this cause he imagined that Socrates was called the wisest of men by Apollo, because all wisdom consists in this, not to think that we know what we do not know.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    … ob eamque rem se arbitrari ab Apolline omnium sapientissimum esse dictum, quod haec esset una hommis sapientia, non arbitrari sese scire quod nesciat.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1853
    And it is on that account that he imagines he was pronounced by Apollo the wisest of all men, because this alone is the whole of wisdom, for a man not to think that he knows what he does not know.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Academica, I.16 (Academica posteriora, Varro's speech; "Acad. Quaest. i. 4" in Ramage).

    Cicero has Varro report Socrates' own account of the oracle: he "imagined that he was pronounced by Apollo the wisest of all men, because this alone is the whole of wisdom, for a man not to think that he knows what he does not know" (quod haec esset una omnis sapientia, non arbitrari sese scire quod nesciat). Ramage, on Tolstoy's list of sources, prints the sentence alone under the heading "Wisdom in not Thinking that One Knows that of which he is Ignorant": "For this cause he imagined that Socrates was called the wisest of men by Apollo, because all wisdom consists in this, not to think that we know what we do not know." Tolstoy turns the rule about all wisdom into a statement about Socrates: «Мудрость Сократа состояла в том, что он не думал, что знал то, чего не знал» (the wisdom of Socrates consisted in his not thinking that he knew what he did not know), and leaves out Apollo. The Latin Library text misprints "hommis" for "omnis".

    Translation note. The Russian italic is broken only at the commas; it is set here as one span.

  19. 6. Жажда желания богатства никогда не утоляется и не удовлетворяется. Те, кто владеют им, мучаются не только желанием приобрести еще больше, но и страхом потерять то, что есть.

    Цицерон.

    6. The thirst of the desire for wealth is never quenched or satisfied. Those who possess wealth are tormented not only by the desire to acquire still more but also by the fear of losing what they have.

    Cicero.

    From Paradoxa Stoicorum · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    The thirst of desire is never filled nor fully satisfied; those who possess such things are tormented not only with the wish to increase them, but also with the fear of losing them.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Neque enim umquam expletur nec satiatur cupiditatis sitis, neque solum ea qui habent libidine augendi cruciantur, sed etiam amittendi metu.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · Cyrus R. Edmonds, 1860
    … for the thirst of cupidity is never filled or satiated. They are tormented not only with the lust of increasing, but with the fear of losing what they have.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Paradoxa Stoicorum, I.6 (Paradox. i. 1 in Ramage).

    Tolstoy translates Ramage's English of the first Paradox closely: "The thirst of desire is never filled nor fully satisfied; those who possess such things are tormented not only with the wish to increase them, but also with the fear of losing them." «Жажда желания» (the thirst of desire) is Ramage's phrase for cupiditatis sitis, and «не утоляется и не удовлетворяется» (is not quenched and not satisfied) his "never filled nor fully satisfied". Two changes: Tolstoy names the object, «богатства» (of wealth), where Cicero's "such things" are money, palaces, influence, commands, and pleasures, and he writes «то, что есть» (what there is) for "them". Ramage's extract begins with Cicero's "I have never, by Hercules, considered heaps of money ... as things either good in themselves or to be desired", which Tolstoy leaves out.

  20. 4. Болезни мысли губительнее и встречаются чаще, чем болезни тела.

    Цицерон.

    4. Illnesses of thought are more ruinous and occur more often than illnesses of the body.

    Cicero.

    From Tusculanae disputationes · close to the original .
    Original · Latin
    At et morbi perniciosiores pluresque sunt animi quam corporis …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    But there are more disorders of the mind than of the body, and they are of a more dangerous nature; …
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculanae disputationes, III.5 (ch. 3).

    A close translation of "morbi perniciosiores pluresque sunt animi quam corporis" (the diseases of the mind are more ruinous and more numerous than those of the body), with «мысли» (of thought) for animi (of the mind) and the two comparatives in the Latin order. Yonge: "But there are more disorders of the mind than of the body, and they are of a more dangerous nature". Cicero goes on with Ennius: the sick mind always errs, can bear nothing, and never stops desiring. The intermediary was not established: the passage is not in Ramage's Latin Authors (its Tusculans have III.2, then III.30) nor in Southgate (searched: diseases of the mind).

  21. 5. По многим соображениям душа добрых людей представляется мне божественной и вечной, но, главным образом, потому, что душа лучших и мудрейших людей так переносится в будущее состояние, что кажется, будто все ее мысли сосредоточены на вечности.

    Цицерон.

    5. For many reasons the soul of good men seems to me divine and eternal, but chiefly because the soul of the best and wisest men is so carried forward into the future state that it seems as though all its thoughts were fixed on eternity.

    Cicero.

    From Pro C. Rabirio perduellionis reo · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    Therefore, for many other reasons, the souls of the good appear to me to be divine and everlasting; but chiefly on this account, because the soul of the best and the wisest has such anticipation of the future, that it seems to regard nothing but what is eternal.
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    … itaque cum multis aliis de causis virorum bonorum mentes divinae mihi atque aeternae videntur esse, tum maxime quod optimi et sapientissimi cuiusque animus ita praesentit in posterum ut nihil nisi sempiternum spectare videatur.
    Source text: raw.githubusercontent.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1856
    … therefore, while there are many reasons why I think that the souls of good men are divine and undying, this is the greatest argument of all to my mind, that the more virtuous and wise each individual is, the more thoroughly does his mind look forward to the future, so as to seem, in fact, to regard nothing except what is eternal.
    Source text: raw.githubusercontent.com
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Pro C. Rabirio perduellionis reo, 29 (ch. 10).

    Tolstoy translates Ramage's English closely: "for many other reasons, the souls of the good appear to me to be divine and everlasting; but chiefly on this account, because the soul of the best and the wisest has such anticipation of the future, that it seems to regard nothing but what is eternal". «Так переносится в будущее состояние, что кажется, будто все ее мысли сосредоточены на вечности» (is so carried into the future state that all its thoughts seem fixed on eternity) renders "ita praesentit in posterum ut nihil nisi sempiternum spectare videatur" (so foresees what comes after that it seems to regard nothing but what is everlasting), and the opening "Therefore" (itaque) is dropped. In the speech Cicero defends the memory of Marius: no one faces the republic's dangers without the hope of posterity's reward, and the forward look of the best souls is toward lasting glory. Ramage, on Tolstoy's list of sources (Jubilee vol. 42), prints the sentence alone under the heading "The Soul", and the Circle reads it, as he does, as a thought on the soul's eternity.

  22. 4. Я не жалею о том, что родился и прожил здесь часть моей жизни, потому что я жил так, что имею причину думать, что принес некоторую пользу. Когда же придет конец, то я оставлю жизнь так же, как я бы ушел из гостиницы, а не из своего настоящего дома, потому что я думаю, что пребывание наше здесь предназначено нам, как переходное и только временное.

    Цицерон.

    4. I do not regret that I was born and have lived here a part of my life, because I have lived so that I have reason to think I have done some good. And when the end comes, I shall leave life as I would leave an inn, and not my own true home, because I think that our stay here is meant for us as a passing and only temporary one.

    Cicero.

    From Cato Maior de senectute · close to the original .
    Original · Latin
    … neque me vixisse paenitet, quoniam ita vixi, ut non frustra me natum existimem, ut ex vita ita discedo tamquam ex hospitio, non tamquam e domo. Commorandi enim natura devorsorium nobis, non habitandi dedit.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · E. S. Shuckburgh, 1900
    … nor do I regret having lived, for I have done so in a way that lets me think that I was not born in vain. But I quit life as I would an inn, not as I would a home. For nature has given us a place of entertainment, not of residence.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Cato Maior de senectute, §84.

    Faithful; 'not born in vain' becomes 'I brought some benefit', and the end ('nature gave us a lodging to sojourn in, not to dwell in') is rendered 'our stay here is meant as transitional and only temporary'. Also in Ramage, Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors ('Life a Temporary Lodging').

  23. 5. Если бы я даже ошибался, полагая, что душа бессмертна, я был бы счастлив доволен своей ошибкой; и пока я живу, ни один человек не в силах отнять у меня эту уверенность, которая дает мне такое неизменное спокойствие, такое полное удовлетворение.

    Цицерон.

    5. Even if I were mistaken in believing that the soul is immortal, I would be happy and content with my mistake; and while I live, no man has the power to take from me this certainty, which gives me such unchanging calm, such complete satisfaction.

    Cicero.

    From Cato Maior de senectute · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Original · Latin
    Quod si in hoc erro, qui animos hominum inmortalis esse credam, libenter erro; nec mihi hunc errorem, quo delector, dum vivo, extorqueri volo …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · E. S. Shuckburgh, 1900
    But if I am wrong in thinking the human soul immortal, I am glad to be wrong; nor will I allow the mistake which gives me so much pleasure to be wrested from me as long as I live.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Cato Maior de senectute, §85.

    Close; Tolstoy adds the closing 'which gives me such unchanging calm, such full satisfaction' and drops the jibe at the 'petty philosophers' who would deride him after death.

    Translation note. The Jubilee reads «счастлив доволен» with no conjunction, evidently a misprint for «счастлив и доволен»: “happy and content”.

  24. 3. Это не добродетель, а только обманчивый слепок и подобие ее, когда мы приведены к исполнению долга ожиданием награды.

    Цицерон.

    3. It is not virtue, but only a deceptive cast and likeness of it, when we are brought to do our duty by the expectation of reward.

    Cicero.

    Probably from De legibus · reworded by Tolstoy .
    Not in Leo Tolstoy as Editor

    The thought is Cicero’s, but not this wording, which probably comes from an anthology not found.

    Original · Latin
    Ergo item iustitia nihil expetit praemii, nihil pretii: per se igitur expetitur eademque omnium uirtutum causa atque sententia est.
    Atque etiam si emolumentis, non <sua> sponte uirtus expetitur, una erit uirtus quae malitia rectissime dicetur.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    Details

    A likely source, not certain. De legibus, I.48-49 (probable).

    Same thought (virtue sought for reward is not virtue) but not the same wording: Tolstoy's 'deceptive cast and likeness of virtue' has no counterpart here. Probably taken from an anthology rendering that could not be located.

    Searched: Latin Library De legibus I, De finibus II, De officiis I and III, De amicitia for simulacrum/imitatio/species virtutis and praemium; Ramage's Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors (1864, archive.org beautifulthought00rama) for reward/praemium; Southgate's Many Thoughts for 'semblance/imitation of virtue'.

  25. 5. Существует только один вечный, неизменный закон, управляющий всеми народами во все времена. Не повинующийся этому закону отрекается от себя, презирает человеческую природу, а этим самым такой человек, хотя и может избегнуть человеческого наказания, накладывает на себя исходящее не от людей, но самое тяжелое наказание.

    Цицерон.

    5. There exists only one eternal, unchanging law, which governs all peoples at all times. He who does not obey this law disowns himself and despises human nature, and by this very thing such a man, though he may escape human punishment, lays upon himself the heaviest punishment of all, one that comes not from men.

    Cicero.

    From De re publica · shortened by Tolstoy .
    Original · Latin
    … est quidem uera lei recta ratio, naturae congruens, diffusa in omnis, constans, sempiterna, quae uocet ad officium iubendo, uetando a fraude deterreat, …
    … nec erit alia lex Romae alia Athenis, alia nunc alia posthac, sed et omnes gentes et omni tempore una lex et sempiterna et inmutabilis continebit unusque erit communis quasi magister et imperator omnium deus: ille legis huius inuentor disceptator lator, cui qui non parebit, ipse se fugiet ac naturam hominis aspernatus hoc ipso luet maximas ( poenas, etiamsi cetera supplicia quae putantur effugerit.
    Source text: la.wikisource.org
    In English · C. D. Yonge (the Republic revised from Francis Barham's translation of 1841), 1877
    True law is right reason conformable to nature, universal, unchangeable, eternal, whose commands urge us to duty, and whose prohibitions restrain us from evil.
    It is not one thing at Rome, and another at Athens; one thing to-day, and another to-morrow; but in all times and nations this universal law must forever reign, eternal and imperishable. It is the sovereign master and emperor of all beings. God himself is its author, its promulgator, its enforcer. And he who does not obey it flies from himself, and does violence to the very nature of man. And by so doing he will endure the severest penalties even if he avoid the other evils which are usually accounted punishments.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. De re publica (fragment preserved by Lactantius, Divinae institutiones VI.8), III.33 (III.22 in older numbering).

    Cicero's famous definition of the natural law, reduced to its two ends: one eternal, unchanging law for all peoples and all times, and the man who disobeys it. Dropped: the law as right reason agreeing with nature, that it cannot be repealed or dispensed by senate or people, that it needs no interpreter, and, notably, 'God is its author, judge and giver'. 'Ipse se fugiet' (he flees from himself) becomes 'renounces himself'; 'he will pay the greatest penalties even if he escapes the other punishments men think of' becomes 'though he may escape human punishment, he lays on himself the heaviest punishment, which does not come from men'. Latin and English agree; De re publica III.33 survives only in Lactantius, given here from Brandt's text on Latin Wikisource.

  26. 1. Сократ первый, сведя философию с небес, распространил ее между людьми, побуждая их изучать науку жизни, человеческих нравов и следствия добрых и злых дел.

    Цицерон.

    1. Socrates was the first to bring philosophy down from the heavens and spread it among men, urging them to study the science of life, of human morals, and of the consequences of good and evil deeds.

    Cicero.

    From Tusculan Disputations · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · Craufurd Tait Ramage, Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors
    Socrates was the first who brought down philosophy from heaven, introducing it into the abodes of men …
    … the science of life, of human morals, and the effects of …
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Socrates autem primus philosophiam devocavit e caelo et in urbibus conlocavit et in domus etiam introduxit et coegit de vita et moribus rebusque bonis et malis quaerere.
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · C. D. Yonge, 1877
    But Socrates was the first who brought down philosophy from the heavens, placed it in cities, introduced it into families, and obliged it to examine into life and morals, and good and evil.
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Tusculan Disputations, V.10 (V.4 in Ramage's numbering).

    Tolstoy follows Ramage's English, not the Latin: 'distributed it among men' is Ramage's 'introducing it into the abodes of men' (Cicero: placed it in cities and brought it into homes), and 'to study the science of life, of human morals, and the consequences of good and evil deeds' is Ramage's 'compelling them to study the science of life, of human morals, and the effects of things good and bad', which expands Cicero's 'made it inquire into life and morals and things good and bad'. Faithful to Ramage, and in sense to Cicero.

  27. 4. Тот, кто познает свою душу, тот узнает в себе божественное начало. Познав же в себе божественное начало, он и будет всегда так действовать и думать, чтобы быть достойным полученного им божественного дара.

    Цицерон.

    4. He who comes to know his own soul will recognize in himself the divine principle. And having come to know the divine principle in himself, he will always act and think so as to be worthy of the divine gift he has received.

    Cicero.

    From De legibus · shortened by Tolstoy .
    What Tolstoy read · Ramage, Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors, heading 'Inspiration of Man. Leg. i. 22.'
    … he will always both think and act in a …
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Nam qui se ipse norit, primum aliquid se habere sentiet diuinum ingeniumque in se suum sicut simulacrum aliquod dicatum putabit, tantoque munere deorum semper dignum aliquid et faciet et sentiet, …
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · Craufurd Tait Ramage, 1864
    For whoever is acquainted with his own mind, will, in the first place, feel that he has a divine principle within him, and will regard his rational faculties as something sacred and holy …
    … worthy of so great a gift of the gods …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. De legibus, I.59 (I.22 in Ramage's numbering).

    Tolstoy's 'божественное начало' is Ramage's 'divine principle' (Cicero: 'aliquid divinum', something divine), so he read the passage in Ramage, where it stands among his Cicero extracts. Kept: whoever knows himself will feel the divine within him and will always think and act worthily of so great a gift. Dropped: that he will regard his mind as a consecrated image, and the second half of the sentence (once he has examined himself he will see how nature equipped him for wisdom). 'Gift of the gods' becomes 'the divine gift he has received', and Tolstoy repeats 'having come to know the divine principle in himself' as a link.

  28. 3. Нельзя любить ни того, кого ты боишься, ни того, кто тебя боится.

    Цицерон.

    3. You cannot love either the one you fear or the one who fears you.

    Cicero.

    From Laelius de amicitia · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · Ramage, Beautiful Thoughts from Latin Authors, heading 'Who can Love Him whom he Fears? …
    For who can either love him whom he fears, or him by whom he thinks that he is feared?
    Source text: archive.org
    Original · Latin
    Quis enim aut eum diligat quem metuat, aut eum a quo se metui putet?
    Source text: thelatinlibrary.com
    In English · E. S. Shuckburgh, 1900
    Who can love one whom he fears, or by whom he knows that he is feared?
    Source text: gutenberg.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Laelius de amicitia, 53 (15 in Ramage's numbering).

    Cicero's rhetorical question (said of tyrants, who can have no friends) made a statement: one cannot love either the one you fear or the one who fears you. Close. The line is also in Ramage, Tolstoy's source for two other Cicero entries this month (12-23.1, 12-23.4).