Theodore ParkerТеодор Паркер
8 passagesотрывков: 8
Each date opens its day beside the list, with these passages marked.Каждая дата открывает свой день рядом со списком, где отрывки этого автора отмечены.
6. Наше церковное христианство построено на пустых и шатких основаниях; полагающиеся на него находятся в постоянной опасности и всегда чего-то боятся. Сильно выраженное сомнение, потрясающее все его основы, вызывает гром и молнии со стороны представителей церкви, и чем основательнее сомнения, тем сильнее тревога.
Разве люди боятся, чтобы горы провалились? Церковное же предание ежеминутно готово разрушиться. «Может — справедливо, может — нет», — вот всё, что могут о нем сказать люди, полагающиеся на него. Тем не менее из него сделали основу религии. Авторитет принимается за истину, и слепое доверие стало сущностью религии.
6. Our church Christianity is built on empty and shaky foundations; those who rely on it are in constant danger and are always afraid of something. A strongly expressed doubt that shakes all its foundations calls forth thunder and lightning from the representatives of the church, and the better founded the doubts, the greater the alarm.
Do people fear that the mountains will give way? But church tradition is ready to crumble at any moment. “Maybe it is true, maybe not” — that is all that the people who rely on it can say of it. Nevertheless it has been made the foundation of religion. Authority is taken for truth, and blind trust has become the essence of religion.
From A Discourse of Matters Pertaining to Religion · reworded by Tolstoy (more).
What changed“Our popular theology” becomes “our church Christianity,” “Tradition is always uncertain” becomes “church tradition is ready to crumble at any moment,” and “Belief,” made the substance of religion, becomes “blind trust.”
Parker’s own wordsOur popular theology is mainly based on the superficial and transient element. It stands by the forbearance of the sceptic. They who rely on it, are always in danger and always in dread.
… and wakens the thunder of the churches; the more reasonable the doubt the greater the alarm.
Do men fear lest the mountains fall : Tradition is always uncertain. " Perhaps yes, perhaps no," is all we can say of it. Yet it is made the basis of Religion. Authority is taken for Truth, and not Truth for Authority.
Belief is made the Substance of Religion, as Authority its Sanction and Tradition its Ground.
Source text: archive.orgA Discourse of Matters Pertaining to Religion, first editionA doubt strongly put, shakes the pulpits of New England, and wakens the thunder of the church. Do men fear lest the …
Source text: archive.orgTolstoy’s own version · На каждый деньНаше церковное христианство построено на пустых и шатких основаниях.
Разве люди боятся, чтобы горы провалились? Церковное же предание ежеминутно готово разрушиться.
Source text: tolstoy.ruDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. A Discourse of Matters Pertaining to Religion (1842), Introduction, The opening paragraph of the Introduction; the London printing (Trübner and the British and Foreign Unitarian Association, 1876).
Changed throughout. Parker's 'Our popular theology is mainly based on the superficial and transient element' becomes 'Our church Christianity is built on empty and shaky foundations' (Наше церковное христианство), and 'It stands by the forbearance of the sceptic' is dropped. 'A doubt strongly put, shakes the pulpits of New England, and wakens the thunder of the churches' becomes 'A strongly expressed doubt, shaking all its foundations, calls forth thunder and lightning from the representatives of the church'. 'Tradition is always uncertain' becomes 'Church tradition is ready to collapse at any moment'; '"Perhaps yes, perhaps no," is all we can say of it' becomes '... is all that those who rely on it can say of it'; 'and not Truth for Authority' is dropped; and 'Belief is made the Substance of Religion' becomes 'blind trust has become the essence of religion' (слепое доверие). Tolstoy starts a new paragraph at 'Do men fear'. The clause he keeps, 'the more reasonable the doubt the greater the alarm', is absent from the first edition (Boston, 1842, saved) and present in later printings (the fourth edition, Boston, 1856, and the fifth, 1870, seen on archive.org; London, 1876, saved), so his text followed a later printing. He reprinted the first paragraph and the next two sentences, to 'ready to collapse', in «На каждый день» (19 January). The Jubilee list of sources names a Unity Mission tract, 'Freedom, Fellowship and Character in Religion' (Chicago), which was not found. No printable.
1. Можно разными способами отрицать Христа: во-первых, можно грубо кощунствовать, издеваться над величием — но такой способ не опасен. Религия слишком дорога людям, чтобы чьи-либо насмешки могли отнять ее у них. Но есть другой способ: это называть Христа господом и не исполнять его заповедей; заглушать его словами свободную мысль и прикрывать, освящать его именем все безумия, заблуждения и грехи людей. Этот второй способ особенно опасен.
1. Christ can be denied in different ways: first, one can blaspheme crudely, mock at greatness — but this way is not dangerous. Religion is too dear to people for anyone’s mockery to take it from them. But there is another way: to call Christ Lord and not keep his commandments; to stifle free thought with his words, and to cover, to sanctify with his name all the follies, errors, and sins of people. This second way is especially dangerous.
From The True Idea of a Christian Church, a discourse at the installation of Theodore Parker … · shortened by Tolstoy (more).
Theodore Parker’s own wordsThere are many ways in which Christ may be denied:--one is that of the bold blasphemer, who, out of a base and haughty heart mocks, scoffing at that manly man, and spits upon the nobleness of Christ!
Religion is so dear to men, no scoffing word can silence that, and the brave soul of this young Nazarene has made itself so deeply felt that scorn and mockery of him are but an icicle held up against the summer's sun.
There is another way to deny him, and that is:--to call him Lord, and never do his bidding; to stifle free minds with his words; and with the authority of his name to cloak, to mantle, screen and consecrate the follies, errors, sins of men! From this we have much to fear.
Source text: gutenberg.orgTolstoy’s own version · На каждый деньМожно разными способами отрицать Христа: во-первых, можно грубо кощунствовать, издеваться над величием, — но такой способ не опасен: религия слишком дорога людям, чтобы чьи-либо насмешки могли отнять ее у них.
Source text: tolstoy.ruDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The True Idea of a Christian Church, a discourse at the installation of Theodore Parker as minister of the Twenty-eighth Congregational Church in Boston, 4 January 1846, in Speeches, Addresses, and Occasional Sermons, vol. I, After 'But the churches do not lead men therein, for they have not his spirit'.
Parker's paragraph, shortened and plainer. The blasphemer 'who, out of a base and haughty heart mocks, scoffing at that manly man, and spits upon the nobleness of Christ' becomes 'one can crudely blaspheme, mock greatness'; 'There are few such deniers: my heart mourns for them. But they do little harm' becomes 'but such a way is not dangerous'. 'no scoffing word can silence that' becomes 'for anyone's mockery to take it from them', and the young Nazarene and the icicle against the summer's sun are left out. The second way is kept clause by clause ('to call him Lord, and never do his bidding; to stifle free minds with his words …'); 'From this we have much to fear' becomes 'This second way is especially dangerous'. Tolstoy reprinted it unchanged but for punctuation in «На каждый день» (18 April). No printable.
1. Христианство — простое дело, очень простое: любовь к человеку, любовь к богу. Будь совершенен, как отец твой небесный; живи в боге, т. е. делай наилучшие дела, лучшим способом и ради наилучших целей.
Всё это очень просто: малое дитя может понять это; и так прекрасно, что великий ум не придумает ничего прекраснее.
1. Christianity is a simple thing, a very simple thing: love of man, love of God. Be perfect like your heavenly Father; live in God, that is, do the best deeds, in the best way, and for the best ends.
All this is very simple: a little child can understand it; and it is so beautiful that a great mind can devise nothing more beautiful.
From A Discourse of the Transient and Permanent in Christianity · shortened by Tolstoy (more).
What Tolstoy read · Theodore Parker: Passages from his Writings, selected by Albert Walkley, in Unity Church…Christianity is a simple thing; very simple.
All this is very simple; a little child can understand it; very beautiful, the loftest mind can find nothing so lovely.
Source text: archive.orgParker’s own wordsChristianity is a simple thing, very simple. It is absolute, pure morality; absolute, pure religion; the love of man; the love of God acting without let or hindrance.
Its watchword is, Be perfect as your Father in heaven. The only form it demands is a divine life; doing the best thing in the best way, from the highest motives; perfect obedience to the great law of God.
All this is very simple—a little child can understand it; very beautiful—the loftiest mind can find nothing so lovely.
Source text: en.wikisource.orgDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. A Discourse of the Transient and Permanent in Christianity (Boston, 19 May 1841), in The Collected Works of Theodore Parker, ed. Frances Power Cobbe, vol. VIII, Miscellaneous Discourses (London: Trübner), Toward the end of the discourse, after 'come to the plain words of Jesus of Nazareth'; Wikisource transcription of Cobbe's vol. VIII.
Parker's paragraph with its middle left out. 'Christianity is a simple thing, very simple' is kept; of 'It is absolute, pure morality; absolute, pure religion; the love of man; the love of God acting without let or hindrance' Tolstoy keeps 'love of man, love of God'. The creed ('there is a God') is left out. 'Its watchword is, Be perfect as your Father in heaven' becomes the command itself, 'Be perfect, as thy heavenly father'; 'The only form it demands is a divine life; doing the best thing in the best way, from the highest motives' becomes 'live in God, that is, do the best deeds, in the best way and for the best ends' (живи в боге, т. е. делай наилучшие дела…); 'perfect obedience to the great law of God' and the sentence on its sanction are left out. The close, 'All this is very simple—a little child can understand it; very beautiful—the loftiest mind can find nothing so lovely', is kept as a paragraph of its own, with 'the loftiest mind can find nothing so lovely' as 'a great mind will devise nothing more beautiful'. Walkley's selection in Unity's Church-Door Pulpit (1885) begins and ends the passage where Tolstoy does, and the selection just before it is the passage of 4-17.2. The Jubilee list of Tolstoy's sources names 'Freedom, Fellowship and Character in Religion, Unity Mission № 18, Chicago'. That is the masthead of Unity's Church-Door Pulpit, whose Series II gave four numbers to 'Gospel passages' of Channing, Parker, Emerson, and Martineau; the Parker number (No. 10, 1885) prints the passages of 4-17.1 and 4-17.2 one after the other, with the same cuts and the same ending as Tolstoy's, so it was probably what he read. Its No. 18 (16 February 1886) is a discourse, S. H. Sonneschein's 'Darwin and Emerson', so the Jubilee's '№ 18' does not match it; the series' Channing and Emerson numbers were not found (Nos. 12 and 13 are missing on archive.org). No printable.
Translation note. Matthew 5:48 (KJV: “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect”).
2. От Моисея до Иисуса совершилось великое умственное и религиозное развитие среди отдельных людей и народов. От времени Иисуса до нашего это движение, как в отдельных людях, так и в народах, было еще значительнее. Старые заблуждения откинуты, и новые истины вошли в сознание человечества. Один человек не может быть так же велик, как человечество. Если великий человек настолько впереди своих собратий, что они не понимают его, — приходит время, когда они сначала догоняют, потом обгоняют его и уходят так далеко, что, в свою очередь, становятся непонятными для тех, которые стоят на том месте, где стоял прежний великий человек, и тогда нужен новый великий человек, и он является и открывает дальнейший путь.
2. From Moses to Jesus a great intellectual and religious development took place among individuals and nations. From the time of Jesus to our own, this movement, in individuals and nations alike, has been still greater. Old errors have been cast off, and new truths have entered the consciousness of humanity. One man cannot be as great as humanity. If a great man is so far ahead of his fellows that they do not understand him, a time comes when they first catch up with him, then overtake him, and go so far ahead that they in their turn become incomprehensible to those who stand where the former great man stood; and then a new great man is needed, and he appears and opens the way onward.
From The Popular Theology, a sermon in Sermons of Theism, Atheism, and the Popular Theology · reworded by Tolstoy (more).
What changedAdds a closing clause of Tolstoy’s own, “and then a new great man is needed, and he appears and opens the way onward”; “No man is so great as mankind” becomes “One man cannot be as great as humanity.”
What Tolstoy read · Theodore Parker: Passages from his Writings, selected by Albert Walkley, in Unity Church…From the time of Jesus to our own time this progress, both in individuals and in nations, has been more rapid.
Every great genius for religion will add new facts to the world’s experience of religion, just as much since the death of Jesus as before his time.
Source text: archive.orgParker’s own wordsFrom the time of Moses to Jesus there was a large intellectual and religious development of mankind, a marked progress in the religious sentiments, ideas, and actions of individual men, and of the leading nations of mankind.
From the time of Jesus to our time this progi'ess, both in individuals and in nations, has been yet more rapid. Old errors have been cast away, new truths have been added to the consciousness of mankind.
No man is so great as mankind. If the great genius at first is so far before his brothers as to be incomprehensible, by and by they overtake him, pass by him, and go still farther …
… on till they become incomprehensible to the man who stands where the genius once stood.
Source text: archive.orgTolstoy’s own version · На каждый деньВсякий великий религиозный гений все больше и больше уясняет религиозные истины и содействует этим все большему и большему единению людей.
Source text: tolstoy.ruDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Popular Theology, a sermon in Sermons of Theism, Atheism, and the Popular Theology (Boston, 1853), Pp. 92–93, after 'I make a distinction between his theology and his religion'.
Close until its last clause, which is Tolstoy's. Parker's five sentences are kept in order, as Walkley's selection gives them: the sentence on the theology of the most eminent Catholics and Protestants, and the one on how wicked it is thought to say this, are left out in both. 'a marked progress in the religious sentiments, ideas, and actions of individual men, and of the leading nations' becomes 'among individual men and peoples'; 'more rapid' becomes 'more significant' (значительнее); 'No man is so great as mankind' becomes 'One man cannot be as great as mankind'; the genius becomes 'a great man'. To the man who stands where the genius once stood Tolstoy adds 'and then a new great man is needed, and he appears and opens the way further' (и тогда нужен новый великий человек, и он является и открывает дальнейший путь), where Parker's selection goes on, 'Every great genius for religion will add new facts to the world's experience of religion'. «На каждый день» (19 February) ends with a version of Parker's sentence instead: 'Every great religious genius makes religious truths ever clearer and so furthers the ever greater union of people', the union being Tolstoy's. The sermon has 'yet more rapid' and 'to our time', the selection 'more rapid' and 'to our own time'; Tolstoy's 'yet more significant' (еще значительнее) and 'to ours' do not decide between them. The Jubilee list of Tolstoy's sources names 'Freedom, Fellowship and Character in Religion, Unity Mission № 18, Chicago'. That is the masthead of Unity's Church-Door Pulpit, whose Series II gave four numbers to 'Gospel passages' of Channing, Parker, Emerson, and Martineau; the Parker number (No. 10, 1885) prints the passages of 4-17.1 and 4-17.2 one after the other, with the same cuts and the same ending as Tolstoy's, so it was probably what he read. Its No. 18 (16 February 1886) is a discourse, S. H. Sonneschein's 'Darwin and Emerson', so the Jubilee's '№ 18' does not match it; the series' Channing and Emerson numbers were not found (Nos. 12 and 13 are missing on archive.org). No printable.
5. Ты молод и переживаешь время увлечений, страстей. Тем более в этой поре слушай голос своей совести, почитай его выше всего. Не отступай от него ни ради похоти, ни ради страсти, ни ради подчинения людским внушениям, обычаям, хотя бы их называли законом. Всегда спрашивай себя: согласно ли это с моей совестью? Будь мужественен и самоотвержен ради требований совести. Не бойся того, что разойдешься с мнением людей.
5. You are young and are going through the time of enthusiasms and passions. All the more at this season of life, listen to the voice of your conscience; revere it above all else. Do not depart from it for the sake of lust, or of passion, or of submission to people’s suggestions and customs, even if they are called law. Always ask yourself: Is this in accord with my conscience? Be courageous and self-denying for the sake of what your conscience demands. Do not be afraid of differing from people’s opinion.
From The Function and Place of Conscience, in Relation to the Laws of Men: A Sermon for the T… · reworded by Tolstoy (more).
What changed“Foolish compliance with other men’s ways” and “ungodly custom” lose “foolish” and “ungodly,” so any submission to people’s suggestions and customs is set against conscience, and “Is it right for me?” becomes “Is this in accord with my conscience?”
What Tolstoy read · Theodore Parker: Passages from his Writings, selected by Albert Walkley, in Unity Church…O, young man, now in the period of the passions, reverence your Conscience.
Ask always, “Is it right for me?” Be brave and self-denying for conscience’ sake. Fear not to differ from men; keeping your modesty, keep your integrity also. * * *
Source text: archive.orgParker’s own wordsOh, young man, now in the period of the passions, reverence your Conscience. Defer that to no appetite, to no passion, to no foolish compliance with other men's ways, to no ungodly custom, even if become a law.
Ask always " Is it right for me ? " Be brave and self-denying for conscience' sake. Fear not to differ from men ; keeping your modesty, keep your integrity also.
Source text: archive.orgDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Function and Place of Conscience, in Relation to the Laws of Men: A Sermon for the Times (preached at the Melodeon, Boston, 22 September 1850), Near the end of the sermon; Speeches, Addresses, and Occasional Sermons, vol. III (Boston: Ticknor and Fields, 1861).
Parker's counsel to the young man, as Unity's Church-Door Pulpit selection of 1885 prints it, cut after 'keep your integrity also' (What Tolstoy read); April found both its Parker entries in the same selection. Tolstoy changes it throughout: 'O, young man, now in the period of the passions, reverence your Conscience' becomes 'You are young and living through the time of enthusiasms and passions. All the more at this age listen to the voice of your conscience, revere it above all'; 'to no foolish compliance with other men's ways, to no ungodly custom, even if become a law' becomes 'nor for submission to men's suggestions, to customs, even if they are called law', so that 'foolish' and 'ungodly' are gone; 'Ask always "Is it right for me?"' becomes 'Always ask yourself: is this in accord with my conscience?'; 'Be brave and self-denying' is kept; 'Fear not to differ from men' becomes 'Do not fear that you will part from people's opinion'; and 'keeping your modesty, keep your integrity also' is left out. No printable, for the changes.
4. Смерть есть только один шаг в нашем непрерывном развитии. Таким же шагом было и наше рождение; с той лишь разницей, что рождение есть смерть для одной формы бытия, а смерть есть рождение в другую форму бытия.
Смерть — это счастье для умирающего человека. Умирая, перестанешь быть смертным. Я не могу смотреть на эту перемену с ужасом, подобно некоторым людям. По-моему, смерть есть перемена к лучшему. Разве мы не безумны, когда говорим о приготовлении к смерти? Наше дело — жить. Тот, кто умеет жить, сумеет и умереть. Я хочу жить, душа наша никогда не говорит нам, что мы умрем. Чувства умирают, а чувства-то и создали смерть. Так стоит ли беспокоиться о ней разумным людям?
4. Death is only one step in our continuous development. Our birth was just such a step, with this difference only: that birth is death to one form of being, and death is birth into another form of being.
Death is happiness for the dying man. In dying, you will cease to be mortal. I cannot look on this change with horror, as some people do. To my mind, death is a change for the better. Are we not mad when we talk of preparing for death? Our business is to live. He who knows how to live will know how to die as well. I want to live; our soul never tells us that we will die. The senses die, and it is the senses that created death. So is it worthwhile for reasonable people to trouble themselves about it?
From Two letters of Theodore Parker, as printed in O. B. Frothingham, Theodore Parker: A Biog… · joined by Tolstoy from several places (more).
Theodore Parker’s own wordsDeath is always a blessing to him who dies : the man ceases to be mortal.
Are we not foolish in talking about preparing to die ? Our business is to live.
I want to live ; for the soul never tells you or me that we shall die. The senses die ; and so death is an affair of the senses, — too sensual a matter for wise men to concern themselves much about.
Death is one step in our progress.
Source text: archive.orgJohn Weiss, Life and Correspondence of Theodore Parker, vol. IDeath is one step in our progress ; birth was a step once. But birth was a death to one form of being, and death is a birth into another form of being.
Source text: archive.orgDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Two letters of Theodore Parker, as printed in O. B. Frothingham, Theodore Parker: A Biography (Boston, 1874), Second paragraph: a letter quoted in ch. 'The Ferment of Thought', pp. 144–145; first paragraph: letter to Robert White, Jun., New York, Boston, 15 March 1853, ch. 'Specimens of Correspondence', pp. 283–284.
Joined from two letters. The first paragraph is from Parker's letter of 15 March 1853 to Robert White, Jun., on the death of White's relative: 'Death is one step in our progress; birth was a step once. But birth was a death to one form of being, and death is a birth into another form of being' becomes 'Death is only one step in our continuous development. Our birth was such a step too, with the one difference that birth is death for one form of being, and death birth into another': 'progress' becomes 'continuous development' (непрерывном развитии). The second paragraph is from an earlier letter that Frothingham quotes without its date or recipient. 'Death is always a blessing to him who dies: the man ceases to be mortal' becomes 'Death is happiness for the dying man. Dying, you cease to be mortal'; 'this change which takes place in the animal system' becomes 'this change'; 'To me it is a change which is always made for the better' is kept; Parker's likening of death to a boy's first change from baby clothes to trousers, with Swedenborg's dead who forgot they had died, is left out. 'Are we not foolish' becomes 'Are we not mad' (Разве мы не безумны); 'He that is prepared to live, and fit to live, is fittest to die: is he not?' becomes 'He who knows how to live will know how to die' (Тот, кто умеет жить, сумеет и умереть); 'the soul never tells you or me' becomes 'our soul never tells us'; 'and so death is an affair of the senses' becomes 'and it is the senses that created death' (а чувства-то и создали смерть); 'too sensual a matter for wise men to concern themselves much about' becomes 'So is it worth reasonable people's troubling about it?'. What Tolstoy read is not known: neither letter is in Albert Walkley's selection in Unity's Church-Door Pulpit (16 October 1885), which gave Tolstoy his Parker in April and June.
Translation note. «Чувства» means both the senses and the feelings; it is read here as the senses.
9. Религия есть высшая форма любви.
9. Religion is the highest form of love.
From Theodore Parker: A Biography, by Octavius Brooks Frothingham · close to the original (more).
Tolstoy’s version, in EnglishReligion is the highest form of love.
Parker’s own wordsThe " sentiments " and apothegms scattered up and down the pages of the Journal and Common-Place Book disclose the earnestness of his mind …
Religion is the highest form of love.
Source text: archive.orgDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Theodore Parker: A Biography, by Octavius Brooks Frothingham (1874), ch. IV, Divinity Hall, p. 61 (Boston: James R. Osgood, 1874), among the 'sentiments' and apothegms Frothingham copies from Parker's Journal and Common-Place Book of his Divinity School years.
Faithful, word for word. The line is Parker's own, from his Journal of his years at the Harvard Divinity School, which Frothingham quotes among a run of his apothegms ('Faith is collective energy', 'Liberty is justice secured'); Peter Dean's The Life and Teachings of Theodore Parker (London, 1877) repeats the list (archive.org full text; not saved). Which book or calendar Tolstoy read it in is not known: it is not in Southgate's two anthologies, Tileston, Coit, Unity's Church-Door Pulpit number on Parker (1885), Parker's saved works, or the saved issues of The World's Advance-Thought. Parker's own words are printed.
Translation note. Tolstoy kept the author’s words closely, so the author’s own English is printed here (ruling 1); Tolstoy’s Russian, translated, is in the source panel.
1. Христос был великий человек. Он проповедывал истинную, всеобщую религию — любви к богу и к человеку. Но я не сомневаюсь в том, что у бога в будущем есть еще более великие люди. Говоря это я не уменьшаю величие характера Христа, но утверждаю всемогущество бога. И когда придут такие люди, возобновится прежняя борьба: вновь побьют живого пророка и обоготворят умершего.
Но как бы там ни было, Христос учит нас теперь истинам, совершенно противоположным тем, которым обыкновенно обучают. Если бы он согласовал свое учение с тем, что ему говорили о людях, если бы он согласовался только с плотью и кровью, он бы был только бедным евреем, и мир потерял бы драгоценнейшее сокровище религиозной жизни, радостную весть единой, всеобщей и истинной религии.
Что, если бы он, как другие, сказал: никто не может быть выше и вернее Моисея? Он бы был ничто, и дух божий покинул бы его душу. Но он общался не с людьми, а с богом, слушался своих надежд, а не своих страхов. Он трудился для людей, с людьми и посредством людей, верил в бога и чистый, как Истина, не побоялся ни церкви, ни государства и не смутился, когда Пилат и Ирод подружились только затем, чтобы распять его. Мне всегда кажется, что я слышу голос этого возвышенного духа, который говорит мне и вам: «Не бойся, бедный брат, и не отчаивайся. Доброта, которая была во мне, возможна и тебе. Бог так же близок к тебе, как он близок был тогда ко мне, и так же богат истиной и так же готов вдохновлять каждого, кто захочет служить ему».
1. Christ was a great man. He preached the true, universal religion — of love for God and for man. But I do not doubt that God has still greater men in the future. In saying this I do not diminish the greatness of Christ’s character, but affirm the almightiness of God. And when such men come, the old struggle will begin again: once more they will stone the living prophet and deify the dead one.
But however that may be, Christ teaches us now truths utterly opposed to those that are commonly taught. Had he made his teaching agree with what he was told about men, had he agreed only with flesh and blood, he would have been only a poor Jew, and the world would have lost the most precious treasure of religious life, the glad tidings of the one, universal and true religion.
What if he, like others, had said: no one can be higher and truer than Moses? He would have been nothing, and the spirit of God would have left his soul. But he took counsel not with men but with God; he listened to his hopes, not to his fears. He labored for men, with men and through men; he believed in God and, pure as Truth, feared neither church nor state, and was not dismayed when Pilate and Herod became friends only in order to crucify him. It always seems to me that I hear the voice of that lofty spirit saying to me and to you: “Do not fear, poor brother, and do not despair. The goodness that was in me is possible for you too. God is as near to you as he was near to me then, and as rich in truth, and as ready to inspire everyone who will serve him.”
From The Relation of Jesus to his Age and the Ages, a sermon preached at the Thursday Lecture… · shortened by Tolstoy (more).
Parker’s own wordsHe is the greatest person of the ages; the proudest achievement of the human race. He taught the absolute religion, love to God and man. That God has yet greater men in store I doubt not; to say this is not to detract from the majestic character of Christ, but to affirm the omnipotence of God. When they come, the old contest will be renewed, the living prophet stoned; the dead one worshipped. Be that as it may, there are duties he teaches us far different from those most commonly taught.
Had he conformed to what was told him of men; had he counselled only with flesh and blood; he had been nothing but a poor Jew--the world had lost that rich endowment of religious genius, that richest treasure of religious life, the glad tidings of the one religion, absolute and true. What if he had said, as others, "None can be greater than Moses, none so great?" He had been a dwarf; the spirit of God had faded from his soul! But he conferred with God, not men; took counsel of his hopes, not his fears.
Working for men, with men, by men, trusting in God, and pure as truth, he was not scared at the little din of church or state, and trembled not, though Pilate and Herod were made friends only to crucify him that was a born King of the world. Methinks I hear that lofty spirit say to you or me, poor brother, fear not, nor despair. The goodness actual in me is possible for all. God is near thee now as then to me; rich as ever in truth, as able to create, as willing to inspire.
Source text: gutenberg.orgDetails
The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Relation of Jesus to his Age and the Ages, a sermon preached at the Thursday Lecture, Boston, 26 December 1844 (Speeches, Addresses, and Occasional Sermons, vol. I), Closing paragraph of the sermon.
Close, with small cuts: 'the greatest person of the ages; the proudest achievement of the human race' becomes 'a great man'; 'He was the greatest fact in the whole history of man' and the last lines ('Daily and nightly He showers down...Lo, God is here') are dropped; 'a born King of the world' is dropped; 'a dwarf' becomes 'nothing'; 'the little din of church or state' becomes 'neither church nor state'. Parker's three excerpts are continuous text.