Эта страница есть и на русском сайте: открыть по-русски.

James MartineauДжеймс Мартино

7 passagesотрывков: 7

Each date opens its day beside the list, with these passages marked.Каждая дата открывает свой день рядом со списком, где отрывки этого автора отмечены.

  1. 2. Чем жизнь наша становится духовнее, тем более мы верим в бессмертие. По мере того, как природа наша удаляется от животной грубости, уничтожаются и ее сомнения. Покрывало снимается с будущего, мрак рассеивается, и мы здесь уже чувствуем свое бессмертие.

    По Мартино.

    2. The more spiritual our life becomes, the more we believe in immortality. As our nature draws away from animal coarseness, its doubts too are destroyed. The veil is lifted from the future, the darkness scatters, and here already we feel our immortality.

    After Martineau.

    From Great Hopes for Great Souls, a sermon on 1 Corinthians 15:48, in Endeavours after the Ch… · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “In proportion as our nature rises in its nobleness” becomes “The more spiritual our life becomes,” realizing immortality becomes believing in it, and the spirit that “walks in dignity within the paradise of God’s Eternity” becomes “here already we feel our immortality.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · James Martineau: Passages from his Writings, selected by C. G. Howland, in Unity Church-…
    In proportion as our nature rises in its nobleness, does it realize its immortality.
    … the veil is lifted up from the future, the darkness breaks away, and the spirit walks in dignity within the paradise of God’s eternity.
    Source text: archive.org
    After Martineau’s own words
    … in proportion as our nature rises in its nobleness, does it realize its immortality.
    As it retires from animal grossness, from selfish meanness, from pitiable ignorance or sordid neglect, — as it opens forth into its true intellectual and moral glory, — do its doubts disperse, its affections aspire : the veil is uplifted from the future, the darkness breaks away, and the spirit walks in dignity within the paradise of God's Eternity.
    Source text: archive.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · На каждый день
    Чем жизнь наша становится духовнее, тем более мы верим в бессмертие.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Great Hopes for Great Souls, a sermon on 1 Corinthians 15:48, in Endeavours after the Christian Life (1843–47), Near the end of the sermon; new edition (Boston: James Munroe, 1858), p. 335.

    Signed 'after Martineau': two sentences retold. 'in proportion as our nature rises in its nobleness, does it realize its immortality' becomes 'The more spiritual our life becomes, the more we believe in immortality': nobleness becomes spirituality, and realizing immortality believing in it. Of 'As it retires from animal grossness, from selfish meanness, from pitiable ignorance or sordid neglect, … do its doubts disperse, its affections aspire' Tolstoy keeps the animal grossness and the doubts. 'the veil is uplifted from the future, the darkness breaks away' is kept; 'and the spirit walks in dignity within the paradise of God's Eternity' becomes 'and we already here feel our immortality' (и мы здесь уже чувствуем свое бессмертие). Unity's Church-Door Pulpit printed the passage in its Martineau number (1886), with 'the veil is lifted up', which is nearer Tolstoy's 'The veil is taken off' (Покрывало снимается) than the sermon's 'uplifted'; the same series printed the Parker passages of 4-17.1 and 4-17.2, and its masthead is the title on the Jubilee list ('Freedom, Fellowship and Character in Religion'), so this number was probably Tolstoy's route. Tolstoy reprinted the Circle's text word for word in «На каждый день» (30 March). No printable.

  2. 2. Двигающая сила во всех совершенствованиях как личностей, так и народов не есть знание того, что есть, а представление того, что может быть.

    Мартино.

    2. The moving force in every perfecting, of individuals as of nations, is not knowledge of what is, but the idea of what may be.

    Martineau.

    From Factors of Spiritual Growth in Modern Society · close to the original .
    What Tolstoy read · The Message of Man: A Book of Ethical Scriptures, gathered by Stanton Coit
    The animating spring of all improvement, in individuals and in societies, is not their knowledge of the actual but their conception of the possible.
    Source text: archive.org
    Martineau’s own words
    In truth, the animating spring of all improvement, in individuals and in societies, is not their knowledge of the actual but their conception of the possible.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Factors of Spiritual Growth in Modern Society (an address, 1860), in Essays, Reviews, and Addresses, vol. IV (London, 1891), Vol. IV, p. 87.

    James Martineau, as in April and November, and not Harriet Martineau, to whom the Jubilee name index refers «Мартино» on this page (vol. 41, p. 318). A close translation of the sentence as Coit prints it, without Martineau's 'In truth': 'the animating spring of all improvement' becomes 'the moving force in all improvements' (Двигающая сила во всех совершенствованиях), 'their knowledge of the actual' 'the knowledge of what is', 'their conception of the possible' 'the idea of what may be'. One word differs: 'societies' is 'peoples' (народов). Faithful to the English: printable offered (the reviewer may weigh 'societies'). Coit's book is on the Jubilee list of Tolstoy's sources, and holds May's other Martineau (5-21.5) too.

  3. 5. Никто не может иметь понятия о добре, пока не начал творить его. И никто не может истинно любить его, пока не делал его часто и с жертвой. И никто не может найти успокоения в нем, пока не делает его всегда.

    Мартино.

    5. No one can have any notion of the good until he has begun to practice it. And no one can truly love it until he has done it often and with sacrifice. And no one can find rest in it until he does it always.

    Martineau.

    From Hand and Heart, a sermon in Endeavours after the Christian Life · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    “A true idea of right” becomes a “notion of the good,” “reverence” for it becomes love, and “any peace ineffable in it, till he does it always and with alacrity” becomes finding “rest in it until he does it always.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · The Message of Man: A Book of Ethical Scriptures, gathered by Stanton Coit
    … any genuine reverence for it until he has done it often and with cost; any peace ineffable in it, till he does it always and with alacrity.
    Source text: archive.org
    Martineau’s own words
    Indeed, no one can have a true idea of right, until he does it; …
    … any peace ineffable in it, till he does it always and with alacrity.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Hand and Heart, a sermon in Endeavours after the Christian Life (1843–47), New edition (Boston: James Munroe, 1858), pp. 204–205.

    Martineau's one sentence of three clauses, made three sentences, each changed. 'No one can have a true idea of right, until he does it' becomes 'No one can have an idea of the good until he has begun to do it' ('right' becomes 'the good', добре, and 'true' moves to the second clause); 'any genuine reverence for it, till he has done it often and with cost' becomes 'no one can truly love it until he has done it often and with sacrifice' (reverence becomes love, cost sacrifice); 'any peace ineffable in it, till he does it always and with alacrity' becomes 'no one can find rest in it until he does it always' ('ineffable' and 'with alacrity' are left out). The sentence is in Coit (1902), which holds May's other Martineau (5-11.2), and in Unity's Church-Door Pulpit of 1 March 1886, through which April's Martineau came; either may be Tolstoy's route. The saved scan of the 1858 sermon reads 'often i and with cost', so the middle clause is shown from Coit. No printable.

  4. 3. Безнадежно положение того, кто в своих невзгодах упрекает не себя, а судьбу, утверждая этим свое самодовольство.

    «Мы были бы добры и кротки, если бы нас не раздражали; мы были бы набожны, если бы не были так заняты. Я был бы терпелив, если бы был здоров; я бы удивил мир, если бы я имел известность».

    Если мы не можем сделать добрым, святым то положение, в котором мы находимся, то мы никакое положение не сделаем добрым и святым.

    Затруднения нашего положения даны нам для того, чтобы мы сгладили, уничтожили их своей добротой и твердостью; мрачность нашего положения дана нам для того, чтобы мы осветили ее божественным светом внутренней, духовной работы; горести — для того, чтобы мы терпеливо и доверчиво переносили их; опасности — для того, чтобы мы проявили наше мужество; искушения — для того, чтобы мы победили их нашей верою.

    Мартино.

    3. Hopeless is the situation of one who in his misfortunes reproaches not himself but fate, thereby affirming his own self-satisfaction.

    “We would be kind and meek if we were not provoked; we would be devout if we were not so busy. I would be patient if I were well; I would astonish the world if I had fame.”

    If we cannot make the situation in which we find ourselves good, holy, we will make no situation good and holy.

    The difficulties of our situation are given us so that we may smooth them away, do away with them, by our goodness and firmness; the gloom of our situation is given us so that we may light it up with the divine light of inner, spiritual work; sorrows — so that we may bear them patiently and trustingly; dangers — so that we may show our courage; temptations — so that we may overcome them by our faith.

    Martineau.

    From Endeavours after the Christian Life · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    The discontent “that quarrels with its tools instead of with its skill” becomes the state of one who “reproaches not himself but fate”; the obstructions to be heaved away “by the concurrent touch of a holy spirit, and labor of strenuous will” are smoothed away “by our goodness and firmness,” and the gloom to be tinted “with some celestial light” is lit “with the divine light of inner, spiritual work.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: Made plain ›

    What Tolstoy read · James Martineau: Passages from his Writings, selected by C. G. Howland, in Unity Church-…
    Wretched and barren is the discontent that quarrels with its tools instead of with its skill; and by criticising Providence manages to keep up complacency with self. How gentle should we be, if we were not provoked; how pious, if we were not busy; the sick would be patient, only he is not in health; the obscure would do great things, only he is not conspicuous !
    Of nothing may we be more sure than this; that, if we cannot sanctify our present lot, we could sanctify no other.
    Source text: archive.org
    Martineau’s own words
    Wretched and barren is the discontent that quarrels with its tools instead of with its skill; and, by criticizing Providence, manages to keep up complacency with self.
    How gentle should we be, if we were not provoked ; how pious, if we were not busy ; the sick would be patient, only he is not in health; the obscure would do great things, only he is not conspicuous !
    … if we cannot sanctify our present lot, we could sanctify no other.
    The obstructions of that lot are given for us to heave away by the concurrent touch of a holy spirit, and labor of strenuous will; its gloom, for us to tint with some celestial light ; its mysteries are for our worship; its sorrows for our trust; its perils for our courage ; its temptations for our faith.
    Source text: archive.org
    Tolstoy’s own version · Путь жизни
    Безнадежно положение того, кто в своих невзгодах упрекает не себя, а судьбу, утверждая этим свое самодовольство.
    Source text: tolstoy.ru
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Endeavours after the Christian Life (1843–47): The Kingdom of God within Us, and Lo! God is Here!, New edition (Boston: James Munroe, 1858), p. 120 (The Kingdom of God within Us) and p. 344 (Lo! God is Here!).

    Two passages from two sermons, joined as Unity's Martineau number of 1886 joins them under 'One's Lot' (What Tolstoy read; April found its Martineau there too). The first is reworded: 'Wretched and barren is the discontent that quarrels with its tools instead of with its skill; and, by criticizing Providence, manages to keep up complacency with self' becomes 'Hopeless is the position of one who in his misfortunes reproaches fate, not himself, thereby affirming his self-satisfaction': the image of the tools and the skill is gone. The four examples become a quotation in the first person: 'How gentle should we be, if we were not provoked; how pious, if we were not busy' is close ('we would be kind and meek if we were not irritated'); 'the sick would be patient, only he is not in health' becomes 'I would be patient if I were well'; 'the obscure would do great things, only he is not conspicuous' becomes 'I would astonish the world if I had fame'. 'if we cannot sanctify our present lot, we could sanctify no other' becomes 'If we cannot make good and holy the position we are in, we shall make no position good and holy' (sanctify becomes 'make good, holy'). Left out: 'Our heaven and our Almighty Father are there or nowhere' and 'its mysteries are for our worship'. 'The obstructions of that lot are given for us to heave away by the concurrent touch of a holy spirit, and labor of strenuous will' becomes 'given us that we may smooth and destroy them by our kindness and firmness'; 'its gloom, for us to tint with some celestial light' becomes 'that we may light it with the divine light of inner, spiritual work'; 'its sorrows for our trust' becomes 'that we may bear them patiently and trustingly'; 'its perils for our courage; its temptations for our faith' are close. Tileston's Daily Strength for Daily Needs prints the two passages apart (28 August and 23 December); only Unity joins them. Tolstoy reprinted the Circle's text in «На каждый день» (27 May) and in Путь жизни (Tolstoy's other version). The Jubilee name index refers «Мартино» in vol. 41 to Harriet Martineau («Мартино Гэрриэт»); the author is James, as May found. No printable.

  5. 3. Только тогда мы сумеем воспользоваться каждой минутой, когда мы будем уверены в своей вечности.

    Только когда мы внесем в нее сознание нашей духовности, самая ничтожная обязанность не будет казаться нам низкою.

    Мартино.

    3. Only when we are sure of our eternity shall we be able to make use of every minute.

    Only when we bring into it the consciousness of our spirituality will the most trifling duty not seem low to us.

    Martineau.

    From Great Principles and Small Duties, in Endeavours after the Christian Life, First Series · reworded by Tolstoy .
    What changed

    Economizing moments “when we anticipate for ourselves an eternity” becomes using every minute “when we are sure of our eternity,” and transfiguring duty “by the glory of our own spirit” becomes bringing into it “the consciousness of our spirituality.”

    Leo Tolstoy as Editor: A different point ›

    What Tolstoy read · James Martineau: Passages from his Writings, selected by C. G. Howland, in Unity Church-…
    Then only shall we wisely economize moments when we anticipate for ourselves an eternity.
    Then will even the merest drudgery of duty cease to humble us, when we transfigure it by the glory of our own spirit.
    Source text: archive.org
    Martineau’s own words
    Then only shall we wisely economize moments when we anticipate for ourselves an eternity, and lose no grain of wisdom, when we discern the glorious and immortal structure which its successive accumulations shall raise.
    Then will even the merest drudgery of duty cease to humble us, when we transfigure it by the glory of our own spirit.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Great Principles and Small Duties, in Endeavours after the Christian Life, First Series (1843), Discourse III, The discourse's last paragraph; new edition, Boston and Cambridge: James Munroe, 1858, p. 58.

    Changed in its second sentence. Unity's selection cuts Martineau's first sentence after 'an eternity', leaving out 'and lose no grain of wisdom, when we discern the glorious and immortal structure which its successive accumulations shall raise', and Tolstoy's thought has the same cut, so the selection was his source. 'Then only shall we wisely economize moments when we anticipate for ourselves an eternity' becomes 'Only then shall we be able to make use of every minute, when we are sure of our eternity' (когда мы будем уверены в своей вечности). 'Then will even the merest drudgery of duty cease to humble us, when we transfigure it by the glory of our own spirit' becomes 'Only when we bring into it the consciousness of our spirituality will the most trifling duty not seem low to us' (Только когда мы внесем в нее сознание нашей духовности, самая ничтожная обязанность не будет казаться нам низкою): Martineau's transfiguring 'glory of our own spirit' becomes the 'consciousness of our spirituality'. The Jubilee name index calls «Мартино» Harriet Martineau, as in earlier months; the author is James.

  6. 1. Я не берусь провести непроводимую черту между богом и нами. Решения воли, несомненно, наши, но в области высшей, в области свободной мысли и чувства, нельзя не признать его присутствия. Всё наиболее глубокое в нас есть только его отражение.

    Он постоянно воодушевляет нас, никогда не перестает действовать через нас, если только мы соглашаемся желать и делать то, чего он хочет. Он содействует нашим нравственным усилиям, поддерживает нас в правде, принимает наше сотрудничество в борьбе со злом и открывает нам множество вещей слишком прекрасных, чтобы их можно было выразить словами.

    Но малейшая неверность ему — и он покидает нас.

    Мартино.

    1. I do not undertake to draw a line between God and us that cannot be drawn. The decisions of the will are undoubtedly ours, but in the higher realm, the realm of free thought and feeling, we cannot fail to recognize his presence. All that is deepest in us is only his reflection.

    He constantly inspires us and never ceases to act through us, if only we consent to desire and to do what he wills. He assists our moral efforts, upholds us in the truth, accepts our cooperation in the struggle against evil, and reveals to us a multitude of things too beautiful to be put into words.

    But the least unfaithfulness to him — and he leaves us.

    Martineau.

    From Lo! God is Here!, sermon XXVII in Endeavours after the Christian Life · shortened by Tolstoy .
    What Tolstoy read · James Martineau: Passages from his Writings, selected by C. G. Howland, in Unity Church-…
    I pretend not to draw the untraceable line that separates his being from ours.
    His inspiration is perennial; and he never ceases to work within us if we consent to will and to do his good pleasure.
    But he is expelled by the least unfaithfulness.
    Source text: archive.org
    Martineau’s own words
    I pretend not to draw the untraceable line that separates his being from ours.
    The decisions of the Will, doubtless, are our own, and constitute the proper sphere of our personal agency.
    Whatever is most deep within us is the reflection of himself.
    He befriends our moral efforts; encourages us to maintain our resolute fidelity and truth; accepts our co-operation with his designs against all evil; and reveals to us many things far too fair and deep for language to express.
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Lo! God is Here!, sermon XXVII in Endeavours after the Christian Life (1843–47), New edition (Boston: James Munroe, 1858), pp. 347–48.

    Shortened, and close to the abridgment Tolstoy read. Howland's selection in Unity's Church-Door Pulpit, which earlier months found behind Tolstoy's Martineau, prints the passage under the heading 'Thou in me, and I in Thee' and runs '... far too fair and deep for language to express. But he is expelled by the least unfaithfulness', leaving out Martineau's 'while he is thus prompt to come with his Spirit to the help of seeking hearts'; Tolstoy's «Но малейшая неверность ему — и он покидает нас» (But the least unfaithfulness to him, and he leaves us) follows that shorter text. Tolstoy also leaves out 'and constitute the proper sphere of our personal agency' and the two sentences on 'our better love, and higher aspirations' and 'the sweet touch of his morning light within us'. Changed words: 'the untraceable line that separates his being from ours' becomes «непроводимую черту между богом и нами» (the line that cannot be drawn between God and us); 'the realm of spontaneous thought and emotion' becomes «в области свободной мысли и чувства» (free thought and feeling); 'there is scope enough for his abode with us' becomes «нельзя не признать его присутствия» (one cannot but acknowledge his presence); 'is expelled' becomes «покидает нас» (leaves us). The 1858 text prints 'perenial'. The same sermon gave July's 7-23.3. The vol. 42 name index refers «Мартино» to Harriet Martineau; the author is James.

  7. 2. Что такое голос долга, если не внушение бога?

    Но, может быть, это предписание вашего же воображения? Повелительное наклонение вашей беседы с самим собой?

    Или, может быть, это только отзвук человеческих мнений, покорность требованиям общественного мнения?

    Но нет: если бы это был закон, нами самими выдуманный, мы могли бы простить себе нарушение его, могли бы отменить его. Но мы чувствуем, что сила этого закона вне нашей власти и что мы не можем пренебречь им.

    Не можем допустить и того, чтобы это было влияние общественного мнения, потому что голос этот часто поднимал нас выше общественного мнения, давал нам силы бороться с несправедливостью толпы, бороться во имя добра одному и без надежды успеха. Скорее вы уверите меня, что дневной свет есть произведение моих глаз или общественного мнения, чем в том, что сознание добра не есть прямое сознание бога.

    Как ощущения учат нас тому, что вне нашего тела, так сознание бога — тому, что вне нашей духовной личности, учит нас тому, что справедливость, доброта, правда не суть произведения моей личности, а вложены в меня богом.

    Мартино.

    2. What is the voice of duty, if not the prompting of God?

    But perhaps it is a prescription of your own imagination? The imperative mood of your conversation with yourself?

    Or perhaps it is only an echo of human opinions, a submission to the demands of public opinion?

    But no: if it were a law we had invented ourselves, we could forgive ourselves for breaking it, we could repeal it. But we feel that the power of this law is beyond our control and that we cannot disregard it.

    Nor can we admit that it is the influence of public opinion, for this voice has often raised us above public opinion, has given us strength to fight the injustice of the crowd, to fight alone in the name of good and without hope of success. You will sooner convince me that the light of day is a product of my eyes or of public opinion than that the consciousness of good is not a direct consciousness of God.

    As our sensations teach us what is outside our body, so the consciousness of God teaches us what is outside our spiritual person: it teaches us that justice, goodness, and truth are not products of my person but have been placed in me by God.

    Martineau.

    From Christ, the Divine Word, sermon in Hours of Thought on Sacred Things, vol. II · close to the original .
    Martineau’s own words
    The voice of Duty, — what is it, if it be not the suggestion of God ? Is it the mandate of your own fancy, imposed upon yourself, — the mere imperative mood in the soliloquies of your own will ? Not so ; for were the law of your making, you might forgive its violation, and the thought that set it up might take it down ; yet you feel its authority above your reach, and your boast of indifference to be a sad pretence.
    Is it a mere echo of men's opinion, — a deference to their arbitrary demands ? Not so ; for how often does it lift you above that opinion, nerve your heart to withstand the injustice of a crowd, …
    As well might you persuade me that my own eyes created the daylight or that the sunshine was the gift of public opinion, as that the sense of right was anything but the direct illumination of God, …
    Not more certainly does Perception teach us what is external to our senses, than Consciousness what lies beyond our personality ; and that the authority of Justice, Purity, and Truth is no manufacture of my own, but is imposed upon me by a Divine source above me, …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. Christ, the Divine Word, sermon in Hours of Thought on Sacred Things, vol. II (London, 1880), Vol. II, pp. 199-200.

    Close, sentence by sentence, with small simplifications ('your boast of indifference to be a sad pretence' becomes 'we cannot neglect it'; 'to fight the good fight though in the forlorn hope alone' becomes 'to struggle alone and without hope of success'; the stars-and-thunder image at the end is dropped, and 'Justice, Purity, and Truth' becomes 'justice, goodness, truth').

    Translation note. Внушение is “suggestion” where Tolstoy means the hypnotic sense; here Martineau’s “prompting” of God within.