Эта страница есть и на русском сайте: открыть по-русски.

The DesatirДэзатир

1 passageотрывков: 1

Each date opens its day beside the list, with these passages marked.Каждая дата открывает свой день рядом со списком, где отрывки этого автора отмечены.

  1. 5. Если спросят тебя, как узнать пророка, отвечай: это тот, кто дает мне знание о моем собственном сердце.

    Персидский Дэзатир.

    5. If you are asked how to recognize a prophet, answer: he is the one who gives me knowledge of my own heart.

    The Persian Desatir.

    From The Desatir, Book of the Prophet Zirtusht · shortened by Tolstoy .
    What Tolstoy read · The Sacred Anthology
    The Nurakh sages ask, ' What use is there for a prophet in this world ?
    He will ask thee, ' How can we know a prophet ? ' By his giving you information regarding your own heart.
    Source text: archive.org
    In English · Mulla Firuz bin Kaus, with Jonathan Duncan, 1818
    The Nurakh *Sages ask, What use is there for a prophet in this world ?
    By his knowing that which others do not know ; …
    And by his giving you information regarding your own heart ; …
    Source text: archive.org
    Details

    The words shown were found, word for word, in the saved source text. The Desatir, Book of the Prophet Zirtusht, vv. 44-52; Conway (1874), no. CCLXXV, The Prophet, p. 177.

    Conway's last sentence, close: 'He will ask thee, "How can we know a prophet?" By his giving you information regarding your own heart.' Tolstoy turns the answer into the speaker's own: «это тот, кто дает мне знание о моем собственном сердце» (he who gives me knowledge of my own heart). Conway had already cut the Desatir: the prophet Zirtusht answers a Greek sage that a prophet is known by three signs, by his knowing what others do not know, by his telling you about your own heart, and by his never being puzzled by a question; Conway keeps the second. The Desatir was published in 1818 from the only known manuscript, bought at Isfahan by the Parsi Mulla Kaus, in an otherwise unknown language with a Persian version. Conway calls it 'of apocryphal authorship, and date in Christian era uncertain', and the 1888 reprint prints the dispute over its genuineness (William Erskine's doubts, Anthony Troyer's defence). Its Persian text, printed in the 1818 first volume, was not available as text and was not checked.